Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Deepin-Kernel-SIG] [Upstream] [linux 6.6-y] wifi: rtw89: Fix TX fail with A2DP after scanning #565

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 17, 2025

Conversation

opsiff
Copy link
Member

@opsiff opsiff commented Jan 16, 2025

mainline inclusion
from mainline-v6.13-rc1
category: bugfix

There might be some racing between BT and WiFi after scan. Since
one of the TX related register will be modified by both FW and
rtw89_set_channel() in driver, which could cause Tx fail. Reorder
the calling sequence to only notify coexistence mechanism after
rtw89_set_channel() is called, so that there are no concurrent
operations.

Fixes: 5f499ce ("wifi: rtw89: pause/proceed MCC for ROC and HW scan")
Signed-off-by: Po-Hao Huang [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih [email protected]
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
(cherry picked from commit f16c40acd31901ad0ba2554b60e0e2b0c7b59cde)

@opsiff opsiff force-pushed the linux-6.6.y-2025-01-16 branch from 298d7a4 to 581fac1 Compare January 16, 2025 14:50
mainline inclusion
from mainline-v6.13-rc1
category: bugfix

There might be some racing between BT and WiFi after scan. Since
one of the TX related register will be modified by both FW and
rtw89_set_channel() in driver, which could cause Tx fail. Reorder
the calling sequence to only notify coexistence mechanism after
rtw89_set_channel() is called, so that there are no concurrent
operations.

Fixes: 5f499ce ("wifi: rtw89: pause/proceed MCC for ROC and HW scan")
Signed-off-by: Po-Hao Huang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
(cherry picked from commit f16c40acd31901ad0ba2554b60e0e2b0c7b59cde)
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from opsiff. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

2 similar comments
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from opsiff. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from opsiff. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@opsiff opsiff merged commit 44e61a7 into linux-6.6.y Jan 17, 2025
8 of 10 checks passed
@opsiff opsiff deleted the linux-6.6.y-2025-01-16 branch January 19, 2025 17:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants