Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Bump various transitive Cargo dependencies #9279

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 27, 2025

Conversation

mcheshkov
Copy link
Member

@mcheshkov mcheshkov commented Feb 26, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 26, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.69%. Comparing base (1dfa10d) to head (35b1be8).
Report is 11 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #9279      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.65%   83.69%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         227      228       +1     
  Lines       81773    82016     +243     
==========================================
+ Hits        68409    68640     +231     
- Misses      13364    13376      +12     
Flag Coverage Δ
cubesql 83.69% <ø> (+0.03%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mcheshkov mcheshkov marked this pull request as ready for review February 27, 2025 09:38
@mcheshkov mcheshkov requested review from a team as code owners February 27, 2025 09:38
Copy link
Member

@KSDaemon KSDaemon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍🏻 Great!

@mcheshkov mcheshkov merged commit 8ebe4b9 into master Feb 27, 2025
72 checks passed
@mcheshkov mcheshkov deleted the cargo-update-2025-02-26 branch February 27, 2025 10:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants