Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create IBC.go #23575

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Create IBC.go #23575

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

josefkedwards
Copy link

@josefkedwards josefkedwards commented Feb 2, 2025

Description

Closes: #23575


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new engine that enhances transaction processing through continuous, real-time monitoring of ledger integrity, consistency, and fraud detection.
    • Improves cross-network analysis by managing transaction memory and evaluating activities across multiple blockchain systems.

@josefkedwards josefkedwards requested a review from a team as a code owner February 2, 2025 19:40
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 2, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new file, IBC.go, which defines the InterchainFiatBackedEngine struct. This engine manages both short‐term and long‐term memory while processing transactions across blockchain networks such as Cosmos, IBC, Bitcoin, and Ethereum. It establishes a constructor for initialization, implements methods to check ledger integrity, verify fiat backing consistency, detect fraud, log suspicious transactions across different ledgers, and continuously update state through a processing loop.

Changes

File Change Summary
IBC.go Added InterchainFiatBackedEngine struct and its constructor. Implemented methods for ledger integrity checks, fiat backing consistency, fraud detection, logging suspicious transactions (across Cosmos, IBC, Bitcoin, Ethereum), processing user input, memory management, transaction-specific ledger checks, continuous conversation processing, and persistent state updates.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Main
    participant Engine
    participant CosmosLedger
    participant IBCLedger
    participant BitcoinLedger
    participant EthereumLedger

    Main->>Engine: NewInterchainFiatBackedEngine()
    loop Continuous Processing Loop
        Engine->>Engine: novelinput() & manageMemory()
        Engine->>CosmosLedger: checkLedgerIntegrityForTransaction(...)
        Engine->>IBCLedger: checkLedgerIntegrityForTransaction(...)
        Engine->>BitcoinLedger: checkLedgerIntegrityForTransaction(...)
        Engine->>EthereumLedger: checkLedgerIntegrityForTransaction(...)
        Engine->>Engine: checkLedgerIntegrity() & checkFiatBackingConsistency()
        Engine->>Engine: detectFraud() & logSuspiciousTransaction()
        Engine->>Engine: updatePersistentState() & analyzeContext()
    end
    Engine->>Main: processConversation() returns updated state
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Create IBC.go file and implement InterchainFiatBackedEngine (23575)
Implement methods for transaction analysis and fraud detection (23575)
Ensure proper memory management for transaction processing (23575)
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Author

@josefkedwards josefkedwards left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here is the review of the new IBC.go file added in Pull Request #23575:

Pros:

Modular Design: The code is well-structured with a clear separation of concerns. Different functions handle specific tasks, such as checking ledger integrity, detecting fraud, and managing memory.
Interoperability: The code integrates multiple blockchain ledgers (Cosmos, IBC, Bitcoin, Ethereum), which is crucial for interchain operations.
Logging: Functions to log suspicious transactions are implemented for each ledger.
Areas for Improvement:

Placeholder Functions: The isSuspicious, isIBCSuspicious, isBitcoinSuspicious, and isEthereumSuspicious functions are placeholders and do not contain actual logic for detecting suspicious transactions. Implementing these is crucial for the engine's functionality.
Error Handling: The code lacks error handling. Functions like cosmosSdkGetFullLedger or bitcore.GetFullLedger should handle possible errors gracefully.
Documentation: Adding comments to describe the purpose and functionality of each function would improve code readability and maintainability.
Testing: Ensure comprehensive unit tests are written for all functions, especially those handling transactions and ledger integrity checks.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
IBC.go (2)

16-16: Prefer Go naming conventions for constants.
The constant CHECK_INTERVAL_SECONDS is written in all uppercase with underscores, which is less common in Go. Consider renaming it to CheckIntervalSeconds for idiomatic Go style.


181-191: Infinite loop prevents function return.
The for { ... } loop causes processConversation never to exit, making the return at line 190 unreachable. This may be intentional, but consider using a goroutine or a context-based cancellation mechanism to gracefully end the process if needed.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9a92843 and 6c0b38d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • IBC.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
IBC.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)
IBC.go

47-47: undefined: sdk.Ledger

(typecheck)


53-53: undefined: sdk.Ledger

(typecheck)


38-38: undefined: cosmosSdkGetFullLedger

(typecheck)


58-58: undefined: sdk.Ledger

(typecheck)


96-96: tx.ID undefined (type "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types".Tx has no field or method ID)

(typecheck)


145-145: undefined: cosmosSdkGetTransaction

(typecheck)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Summary

}

func (fde *InterchainFiatBackedEngine) checkLedgerIntegrity() {
cosmosLedger := cosmosSdkGetFullLedger()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Undefined function cosmosSdkGetFullLedger.
This call triggers a typecheck error. Ensure you define or import the corresponding function, or remove the reference if it's unneeded.

🧰 Tools
🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)

38-38: undefined: cosmosSdkGetFullLedger

(typecheck)

IBC.go Show resolved Hide resolved
IBC.go Show resolved Hide resolved
IBC.go Show resolved Hide resolved
Doing a placeholder function for the ledger for now
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
IBC.go (1)

36-40: ⚠️ Potential issue

Replace placeholder implementation with actual Cosmos SDK integration.

The function cosmosSdkGetFullLedger is a placeholder that returns an undefined sdk.Ledger type. The Cosmos SDK does not provide this type.

Consider using the actual types from the Cosmos SDK:

-func cosmosSdkGetFullLedger() sdk.Ledger {
-    // Placeholder implementation
-    // Replace with actual logic to retrieve the full ledger from the Cosmos SDK
-    return sdk.Ledger{}
-}
+func cosmosSdkGetFullLedger() *sdk.Context {
+    // Implement actual ledger retrieval using Cosmos SDK's Context
+    ctx := sdk.NewContext(...)
+    return ctx
+}
🧰 Tools
🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)

36-36: undefined: sdk.Ledger

(typecheck)


39-39: undefined: sdk.Ledger

(typecheck)

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
IBC.go (2)

14-17: Document the rationale for constant values.

The memory capacity and check interval values appear arbitrary. Consider adding comments explaining why these specific values were chosen and their implications.


33-33: Remove magic number for ATOMValue initialization.

The initial ATOM value of 5.89 is hardcoded without explanation. Consider making this configurable or document why this specific value is used.

-        ATOMValue:             5.89, // Starting from a hypothetical value
+        ATOMValue:             config.DefaultATOMValue, // Initial ATOM value from configuration
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6c0b38d and 878785e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • IBC.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
IBC.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)
IBC.go

36-36: undefined: sdk.Ledger

(typecheck)


51-51: undefined: sdk.Ledger

(typecheck)


57-57: undefined: sdk.Ledger

(typecheck)


39-39: undefined: sdk.Ledger

(typecheck)


62-62: undefined: sdk.Ledger

(typecheck)


100-100: tx.ID undefined (type "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types".Tx has no field or method ID)

(typecheck)


149-149: undefined: cosmosSdkGetTransaction

(typecheck)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Summary

IBC.go Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines +9 to +11
ibc "github.com/hypothetical/ibc-integration"
bitcore "github.com/hypothetical/bitcore-integration"
ethereum "github.com/hypothetical/ethereum-integration"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix dependency references in IBC.go

The shell script confirms that the packages referenced in the imports:

  • github.com/hypothetical/ibc-integration
  • github.com/hypothetical/bitcore-integration
  • github.com/hypothetical/ethereum-integration

do not exist on GitHub. These hypothetical imports should be replaced with actual, valid dependencies.

🔗 Analysis chain

Replace hypothetical imports with actual dependencies.

The imports reference non-existent packages (github.com/hypothetical/*). These need to be replaced with actual blockchain integration packages.

Let's verify if these packages exist:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the imported packages exist on GitHub
for pkg in "ibc-integration" "bitcore-integration" "ethereum-integration"; do
  gh api repos/hypothetical/$pkg 2>/dev/null || echo "Package hypothetical/$pkg does not exist"
done

Length of output: 1079

IBC.go Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines +132 to +143
func (fde *InterchainFiatBackedEngine) manageMemory(input string) {
if len(fde.shortTermMemory) >= MEMORY_CAPACITY {
fde.shortTermMemory = fde.shortTermMemory[1:]
}
fde.shortTermMemory = append(fde.shortTermMemory, input)

if count, exists := fde.longTermMemory[input]; exists {
fde.longTermMemory[input] = count + 1
} else {
fde.longTermMemory[input] = 1
}
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Implement memory cleanup mechanism.

The manageMemory method manages short-term memory size but lacks cleanup for long-term memory, which could lead to unbounded growth.

Add a cleanup mechanism:

 func (fde *InterchainFiatBackedEngine) manageMemory(input string) {
     if len(fde.shortTermMemory) >= MEMORY_CAPACITY {
         fde.shortTermMemory = fde.shortTermMemory[1:]
     }
     fde.shortTermMemory = append(fde.shortTermMemory, input)
 
     if count, exists := fde.longTermMemory[input]; exists {
         fde.longTermMemory[input] = count + 1
     } else {
         fde.longTermMemory[input] = 1
     }
+    // Cleanup old entries from long-term memory
+    if len(fde.longTermMemory) > MEMORY_CAPACITY * 10 {
+        fde.cleanupLongTermMemory()
+    }
 }
+
+func (fde *InterchainFiatBackedEngine) cleanupLongTermMemory() {
+    // Remove entries with lowest counts
+    // Implementation here
+}
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
func (fde *InterchainFiatBackedEngine) manageMemory(input string) {
if len(fde.shortTermMemory) >= MEMORY_CAPACITY {
fde.shortTermMemory = fde.shortTermMemory[1:]
}
fde.shortTermMemory = append(fde.shortTermMemory, input)
if count, exists := fde.longTermMemory[input]; exists {
fde.longTermMemory[input] = count + 1
} else {
fde.longTermMemory[input] = 1
}
}
func (fde *InterchainFiatBackedEngine) manageMemory(input string) {
if len(fde.shortTermMemory) >= MEMORY_CAPACITY {
fde.shortTermMemory = fde.shortTermMemory[1:]
}
fde.shortTermMemory = append(fde.shortTermMemory, input)
if count, exists := fde.longTermMemory[input]; exists {
fde.longTermMemory[input] = count + 1
} else {
fde.longTermMemory[input] = 1
}
// Cleanup old entries from long-term memory
if len(fde.longTermMemory) > MEMORY_CAPACITY*10 {
fde.cleanupLongTermMemory()
}
}
func (fde *InterchainFiatBackedEngine) cleanupLongTermMemory() {
// Remove entries with lowest counts
// Implementation here
}

@aljo242 aljo242 closed this Feb 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants