Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: fix typo #23417

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

chore: fix typo #23417

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

chloefeal
Copy link
Contributor

@chloefeal chloefeal commented Jan 16, 2025

Only found one typo to fix, maybe the last one ^.^ I hope my correction will help you. Thank you for your work.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes for Cosmos SDK v0.52 Upgrade

  • Breaking Changes

    • Removed x/params and x/crisis modules
    • Introduced new x/validate and x/accounts modules
    • Updated module initialization and genesis methods
    • Simplified module interface structures
  • New Features

    • Added support for unordered transactions
    • Introduced more flexible module parameter management
    • Enhanced protocol pool functionality
  • Migration Recommendations

    • Update module imports to use cosmossdk.io/x/...
    • Migrate to new context and interface handling
    • Implement custom inflation logic in mint module

Developers should carefully review the comprehensive upgrade guide and test their implementations thoroughly.

Signed-off-by: chloefeal <[email protected]>
@chloefeal chloefeal requested a review from a team as a code owner January 16, 2025 14:34
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 16, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The document provides a comprehensive guide for upgrading from Cosmos SDK v0.50 to v0.52, highlighting significant architectural and functional changes. The upgrade involves removing certain modules like x/params and x/crisis, introducing new modules such as x/validate and x/accounts, and refactoring module management. Key modifications include changes to module initialization, genesis handling, method signatures, and import structures, requiring developers to carefully migrate and adapt their existing code to the new SDK version.

Changes

File/Path Change Summary
x/{module_name}/module.go - Updated method signatures for InitGenesis and ExportGenesis
- Merged AppModuleBasic with AppModule
- Modified interface registration methods
x/gov/module.go Updated ProposalHandler to use context.Context
Module Imports Refactored to use cosmossdk.io/x/...
Protobuf Configuration - Removed cosmossdk.io/api/tendermint package
- Adjusted Any type location

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

backport/v0.52.x, T:Docs

Suggested reviewers

  • julienrbrt
  • tac0turtle
  • lucaslopezf
  • akhilkumarpilli

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
docs/build/building-apps/upgrades/0.52.md (1)

Line range hint 383-383: Fix spelling error in the protocolpool description.

The word "fot" appears to be a typo and should be "for".

-This new module allows teams and the community to create funding opportunities fot the development team and the community.
+This new module allows teams and the community to create funding opportunities for the development team and the community.
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
docs/build/building-apps/upgrades/0.52.md (2)

148-148: Improve clarity of unordered transactions introduction.

The sentence structure could be improved to better explain this important feature.

-v0.52 introduces unordered transactions, this feature allows transactions to not need sequence numbers and has its own replay protection system. 
+v0.52 introduces unordered transactions, a feature that allows transactions to be processed without sequence numbers while maintaining its own replay protection system.

Line range hint 489-516: Code example needs formatting improvement.

The diff block in the AppModule example could be better formatted for readability. Consider adding spaces between different function blocks and ensuring consistent indentation.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 85682ac and 57a498c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/build/building-apps/upgrades/0.52.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
docs/build/building-apps/upgrades/0.52.md (1)

Pattern **/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"

🪛 GitHub Actions: Spell Check
docs/build/building-apps/upgrades/0.52.md

[warning] 383-383: Spelling error: 'fot' should be one of: for, fit, dot, rot, cot, got, tot, fog

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: build (arm64)
  • GitHub Check: build (amd64)
  • GitHub Check: markdown-link-check
  • GitHub Check: Summary
🔇 Additional comments (2)
docs/build/building-apps/upgrades/0.52.md (2)

Line range hint 4-24: Documentation structure looks good!

The introduction and prerequisites sections are well-organized and provide clear context for the upgrade process.


Line range hint 26-40: Important Changes Overview section is comprehensive.

The section effectively summarizes the key changes, making it easier for developers to understand the scope of the upgrade.

@aljo242
Copy link
Collaborator

aljo242 commented Jan 16, 2025

Closing as this does not follow our CONTRIBUTING guidelines

@aljo242 aljo242 closed this Jan 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants