-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: clarify what is available in ctx.BlockHeader() #23394
Changes from 1 commit
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -28,5 +28,6 @@ type FeegrantKeeper interface { | |
} | ||
|
||
type ConsensusKeeper interface { | ||
AppVersion(ctx context.Context) (uint64, error) | ||
julienrbrt marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
BlockParams(context.Context) (uint64, uint64, error) | ||
} | ||
Comment on lines
+31
to
33
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. 💡 Codebase verification Missing test coverage for ConsensusKeeper interface methods The ConsensusKeeper interface lacks test coverage:
Please:
🔗 Analysis chainAdd test coverage for the ConsensusKeeper interface. The pipeline indicates 0% test coverage. Please add tests to verify the behavior of implementations of this interface, particularly the new Let me help verify the current test coverage: Would you like me to help create a test suite for this interface? 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check for existing test files and their coverage
echo "Checking for existing test files..."
fd --type f "expected_keepers_test.go" .
echo "Checking test coverage for ConsensusKeeper implementations..."
rg -l "type \w+ struct.*implements.*ConsensusKeeper"
Length of output: 309 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Find all test files in auth/ante directory
echo "=== Test files in auth/ante ==="
fd -e go -e test.go . x/auth/ante/
# Search for ConsensusKeeper interface implementations
echo -e "\n=== ConsensusKeeper implementations ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ struct {
$$$
}'
# Search for ConsensusKeeper usage in test files
echo -e "\n=== ConsensusKeeper usage in tests ==="
rg "ConsensusKeeper" -A 5 -B 5 --type go --glob "*_test.go"
# Look for mock implementations
echo -e "\n=== Mock implementations ==="
rg "mock.*ConsensusKeeper" --type go
Length of output: 68209 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Search for ConsensusKeeper interface usage and mocks in test files
echo "=== ConsensusKeeper in test files ==="
rg -B 5 -A 5 "ConsensusKeeper" x/auth/ante/testutil/expected_keepers_mocks.go
# Search for AppVersion and BlockParams method usage in tests
echo -e "\n=== AppVersion and BlockParams usage in tests ==="
rg -l "AppVersion|BlockParams" x/auth/ante/**/*_test.go
# Check mock implementations
echo -e "\n=== Mock implementations content ==="
cat x/auth/ante/testutil/expected_keepers_mocks.go
Length of output: 10079 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check for actual usage of BlockParams in tests
echo "=== BlockParams usage in tests ==="
rg -B 5 -A 5 "BlockParams" x/auth/ante/unorderedtx/manager_test.go x/auth/ante/unorderedtx/snapshotter_test.go
# Check if AppVersion is used anywhere in tests
echo -e "\n=== AppVersion usage in tests ==="
rg -l "AppVersion" x/auth/ante/**/*_test.go
Length of output: 375 🧰 Tools🪛 GitHub Actions: Tests / Code Coverage[warning] No test coverage (0.0% of statements covered) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Change potentially affects state.
Call sequence: