Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

V9.0.1/package maintenance #8

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 30, 2025
Merged

V9.0.1/package maintenance #8

merged 5 commits into from
Jan 30, 2025

Conversation

gimlichael
Copy link
Member

@gimlichael gimlichael commented Jan 30, 2025

This pull request includes several updates and new additions to the project, focusing on dependency upgrades, documentation updates, and the addition of a new example project. The most important changes include updating the target framework, adding a new Web API example project, and updating various dependencies.

Dependency and Framework Updates:

  • Updated the base image in .docfx/Dockerfile.docfx from nginx:1.27.0-alpine to nginx:1.27.3-alpine.
  • Changed the TargetFramework in .docfx/docfx.json from net8.0 to net9.0.
  • Updated package versions in Directory.Packages.props to the latest versions, including Codebelt.Extensions.Asp.Versioning, Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.App, and others.

Documentation and Metadata Updates:

  • Updated the copyright year in LICENSE, Directory.Build.props, and .docfx/docfx.json to include 2025. (Ffd45efcL1, Directory.Build.propsL19-R19)
  • Added a link to the full documentation generated by DocFx in README.md.

New Web API Example Project:

  • Added a new project WebApiExample with controllers, startup configuration, and launch settings. This includes files such as WeatherForecastController.cs, Program.cs, Startup.cs, and others. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes v9.0.1

  • New Features

    • Added a new WebApiExample project with a weather forecast API endpoint
    • Introduced documentation link in README
  • Package Updates

    • Updated multiple package versions
    • Added new package dependencies
    • Upgraded to .NET 9.0 support
  • Documentation

    • Extended copyright notice to 2024-2025
    • Updated DocFX configuration
  • Infrastructure

    • Updated Docker and test environment images
    • Modified project configuration files

@gimlichael gimlichael self-assigned this Jan 30, 2025
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 30, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a comprehensive update to the project, focusing on version upgrades, package management, and the addition of a new WebApiExample project. The changes span multiple configuration files, including Dockerfile, package references, solution file, and project settings. The update primarily targets .NET 9.0, extends copyright notices, and adds a new example web API project with weather forecast functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
.docfx/Dockerfile.docfx Nginx base image updated from 1.27.0-alpine to 1.27.3-alpine
.docfx/docfx.json Updated .NET framework to net9.0, modified copyright notice
.nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/PackageReleaseNotes.txt Version updated to 9.0.1, availability clarified
CHANGELOG.md New version 9.0.1 entry added
Codebelt..Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.sln Added "tooling" and "WebApiExample" projects
Directory.Build.props Updated copyright notice, removed SourceLink package reference
Directory.Packages.props Multiple package versions updated, new packages added
LICENSE Copyright year extended to 2024-2025
README.md Added documentation link
testenvironments.json Docker image version incremented
tooling/WebApiExample/* New WebApiExample project with controllers, startup, and configuration files

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant WeatherForecastController
    participant Logger

    Client->>WeatherForecastController: GET /weatherforecast
    WeatherForecastController->>Logger: Log request
    WeatherForecastController-->>Client: Return weather forecast data
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Ode to Code Update

Hop, hop, through versions new and bright,
.NET 9.0 takes its flight!
Packages dance, controllers sing,
WebApiExample spreads its wing! 🌦️
Code evolves with rabbit's might! 🚀


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (8)
tooling/WebApiExample/WeatherForecast.cs (2)

11-11: Consider improving temperature conversion accuracy.

The current formula uses a magic number (0.5556) for Celsius to Fahrenheit conversion. Consider using a more precise constant and documenting the conversion logic.

-        public int TemperatureF => 32 + (int)(TemperatureC / 0.5556);
+        /// <summary>
+        /// Gets the temperature in Fahrenheit, calculated from Celsius.
+        /// </summary>
+        public int TemperatureF => 32 + (int)(TemperatureC * 1.8);

7-13: Add data validation attributes.

Consider adding validation attributes to ensure data integrity:

+using System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations;

 public class WeatherForecast
 {
+        [Required]
         public DateTime Date { get; set; }
 
+        [Range(-90, 60, ErrorMessage = "Temperature must be between -90°C and 60°C")]
         public int TemperatureC { get; set; }
 
         public int TemperatureF => 32 + (int)(TemperatureC * 1.8);
 
+        [Required]
+        [StringLength(100)]
         public string Summary { get; set; }
 }
tooling/WebApiExample/Controllers/WeatherForecastController.cs (2)

31-31: Use DateTime.UtcNow instead of DateTime.Now.

For consistency across different time zones and better testability, use UTC timestamps.

-                Date = DateTime.Now.AddDays(index),
+                Date = DateTime.UtcNow.AddDays(index),

25-36: Add API documentation and utilize logging.

The endpoint lacks OpenAPI documentation and doesn't utilize the injected logger.

+        /// <summary>
+        /// Retrieves a 5-day weather forecast.
+        /// </summary>
+        /// <returns>An array of weather forecasts.</returns>
+        /// <response code="200">Returns the weather forecast</response>
         [HttpGet]
+        [ProducesResponseType(typeof(IEnumerable<WeatherForecast>), StatusCodes.Status200OK)]
         public IEnumerable<WeatherForecast> Get()
         {
+            _logger.LogInformation("Generating weather forecast");
             var rng = Random.Shared;
             return Enumerable.Range(1, 5).Select(index => new WeatherForecast
             {
                 Date = DateTime.UtcNow.AddDays(index),
                 TemperatureC = rng.Next(-20, 55),
                 Summary = Summaries[rng.Next(Summaries.Length)]
             })
             .ToArray();
         }
tooling/WebApiExample/Startup.cs (1)

20-24: Consider enhancing the API configuration.

The current setup could benefit from additional configurations:

  1. API versioning support
  2. CORS policy for cross-origin requests
  3. More detailed Swagger documentation

Consider applying these enhancements:

 services.AddControllers();
+services.AddApiVersioning(options =>
+{
+    options.DefaultApiVersion = new ApiVersion(1, 0);
+    options.ReportApiVersions = true;
+    options.AssumeDefaultVersionWhenUnspecified = true;
+});
+services.AddCors(options =>
+{
+    options.AddPolicy("default", policy =>
+    {
+        policy.WithOrigins("http://localhost:3000")
+              .AllowAnyMethod()
+              .AllowAnyHeader();
+    });
+});
 services.AddSwaggerGen(c =>
 {
     c.SwaggerDoc("v1", new OpenApiInfo { 
         Title = nameof(WebApiExample), 
-        Version = "v1" 
+        Version = "v1",
+        Description = "Example API demonstrating Swashbuckle integration",
+        Contact = new OpenApiContact
+        {
+            Name = "Geekle",
+            Email = "[email protected]"
+        }
     });
 });
tooling/WebApiExample/WebApiExample.csproj (1)

4-4: Consider multi-targeting like other projects.

Other projects in the solution target both net9.0 and net8.0. Consider aligning this project's targeting strategy for consistency.

-    <TargetFrameworks>net9.0</TargetFrameworks>
+    <TargetFrameworks>net9.0;net8.0</TargetFrameworks>
.nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (1)

1-6: Consider language improvements in the release notes.

The release notes are clear and follow the established format. However, consider these minor language improvements:

  • Add "the" before "latest and greatest"
  • Consider replacing "with respect to" with "for" to be more concise

Apply this diff to improve readability:

- CHANGED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs
+ CHANGED Dependencies to the latest and greatest for TFMs
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~5-~5: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ... 8
 

ALM

  • CHANGED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs
     
    V...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)


[style] ~5-~5: ‘with respect to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...GED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs
 
Version 9.0.0
Availability: ....

(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_RESPECT_TO)

README.md (1)

9-9: Format the documentation URL using markdown syntax.

The bare URL should be formatted using markdown link syntax for better readability and to follow markdown best practices.

Apply this diff to improve the formatting:

- Full documentation (generated by [DocFx](https://github.com/dotnet/docfx)) located here: https://swashbuckle.codebelt.net/
+ Full documentation (generated by [DocFx](https://github.com/dotnet/docfx)) is available [here](https://swashbuckle.codebelt.net/).
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

9-9: Bare URL used
null

(MD034, no-bare-urls)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 499d4b4 and 2a63cb4.

📒 Files selected for processing (19)
  • .docfx/Dockerfile.docfx (1 hunks)
  • .docfx/docfx.json (2 hunks)
  • .nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (1 hunks)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • Codebelt..Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.sln (2 hunks)
  • Directory.Build.props (1 hunks)
  • Directory.Packages.props (1 hunks)
  • LICENSE (1 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • testenvironments.json (1 hunks)
  • tooling/WebApiExample/Controllers/WeatherForecastController.cs (1 hunks)
  • tooling/WebApiExample/Program.cs (1 hunks)
  • tooling/WebApiExample/Properties/launchSettings.json (1 hunks)
  • tooling/WebApiExample/Startup.cs (1 hunks)
  • tooling/WebApiExample/WeatherForecast.cs (1 hunks)
  • tooling/WebApiExample/WebApiExample.csproj (1 hunks)
  • tooling/WebApiExample/WebApiExample.http (1 hunks)
  • tooling/WebApiExample/appsettings.Development.json (1 hunks)
  • tooling/WebApiExample/appsettings.json (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (8)
  • LICENSE
  • tooling/WebApiExample/appsettings.Development.json
  • tooling/WebApiExample/appsettings.json
  • tooling/WebApiExample/WebApiExample.http
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • tooling/WebApiExample/Properties/launchSettings.json
  • testenvironments.json
  • .docfx/Dockerfile.docfx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
README.md

9-9: Bare URL used
null

(MD034, no-bare-urls)

🪛 LanguageTool
.nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/PackageReleaseNotes.txt

[uncategorized] ~5-~5: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ... 8
 

ALM

  • CHANGED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs
     
    V...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)


[style] ~5-~5: ‘with respect to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...GED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs
 
Version 9.0.0
Availability: ....

(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_RESPECT_TO)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: 🧪 Test (windows-2022, Release)
  • GitHub Check: 🧪 Test (windows-2022, Debug)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
Directory.Packages.props (2)

10-10: Verify compatibility with Microsoft.AspNetCore.OpenApi package.

The newly added Microsoft.AspNetCore.OpenApi package version 9.0.1 is in preview/beta since .NET 9 is not yet released. Ensure your CI pipeline is configured to handle preview packages.


13-13: Verify Swashbuckle.AspNetCore compatibility with .NET 9.

Version 7.2.0 might need verification for full compatibility with .NET 9 preview.

✅ Verification successful

Swashbuckle.AspNetCore 7.2.0 is compatible with .NET 9

The package targets .NET Standard 2.0, which is fully supported by .NET 9. Additionally, the package's recent release date (December 2024) indicates active maintenance.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check package compatibility information
curl -s "https://api.nuget.org/v3/registration5-semver1/swashbuckle.aspnetcore/index.json" | jq '.items[0].items[] | select(.catalogEntry.version=="7.2.0") | .catalogEntry.dependencyGroups[].targetFramework'

Length of output: 207


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Fetch package details from NuGet
curl -s "https://api.nuget.org/v3/registration5-semver1/swashbuckle.aspnetcore/7.2.0.json" | jq '.'

Length of output: 1007


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Fetch package catalog entry
curl -s "https://api.nuget.org/v3/catalog0/data/2024.12.10.17.24.44/swashbuckle.aspnetcore.7.2.0.json" | jq '.dependencyGroups[].targetFramework'

Length of output: 163

tooling/WebApiExample/Program.cs (1)

9-15: LGTM! Follows ASP.NET Core best practices.

The implementation correctly uses async/await pattern and inherits from the base WebProgram class.

Codebelt..Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.sln (1)

14-17: LGTM!

The solution changes are well-structured:

  • Proper organization with a new "tooling" folder
  • Correct project configurations for all platforms

Also applies to: 32-35, 43-43

Directory.Build.props (2)

19-19: LGTM!

Copyright year update is appropriate.


Line range hint 41-45: Verify impact of removing Microsoft.SourceLink.GitHub.

The Microsoft.SourceLink.GitHub package was removed, which might affect source link debugging capabilities.

✅ Verification successful

Source link debugging capabilities are maintained despite package removal

The removal of Microsoft.SourceLink.GitHub is safe as the codebase maintains source link functionality through:

  • Proper repository metadata configuration
  • Enabled repository URL publishing
  • Built-in source link support in the .NET SDK
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if any other files still reference Microsoft.SourceLink.GitHub
rg "Microsoft\.SourceLink\.GitHub" --type xml

Length of output: 196


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find all project and props/targets files
echo "=== Project and props files ==="
fd -e csproj -e props -e targets

# Search for SourceLink related configurations
echo -e "\n=== SourceLink configurations ==="
fd -e csproj -e props -e targets -X grep -i "sourcelink\|debugtype\|debugsymbols\|repository"

Length of output: 1009

tooling/WebApiExample/WebApiExample.csproj (1)

8-9: Specify package versions for better version control.

Package versions should be specified for better dependency management and reproducible builds.

.docfx/docfx.json (2)

48-48: LGTM! Copyright year updated.

The copyright year range has been updated to include 2025.


15-15: Verify .NET 9.0 compatibility.

The target framework has been updated to .NET 9.0, which is currently in early development. Please ensure that:

  1. All dependencies support .NET 9.0
  2. The project has been tested with .NET 9.0 preview
✅ Verification successful

The .NET 9.0 target framework is correctly configured

The project is properly set up for .NET 9.0:

  • Multi-targets both .NET 9.0 and 8.0
  • All dependencies are using .NET 9.0 compatible versions
  • Package versions are centrally managed and up-to-date
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check package dependencies for .NET 9.0 compatibility
# Look for TargetFramework declarations in project files
fd -e csproj -x cat {} \; | rg -i 'TargetFramework|TargetFrameworks'

# Check package references and their versions
fd -e props -e csproj -x cat {} \; | rg -i 'PackageReference'

Length of output: 1036


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get package versions for all dependencies
fd -e props -e csproj -x cat {} \; | rg -i 'PackageReference.*Version'

# Also check global.json for SDK version
fd global.json -x cat {} \;

Length of output: 179


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check Directory.Packages.props and Directory.Build.props
fd "Directory.(Packages|Build).props" -x cat {} \;

# Also check for any SDK version references in MSBuild files
fd -e props -e csproj -x cat {} \; | rg -i "SDK|Version"

Length of output: 6550

[HttpGet]
public IEnumerable<WeatherForecast> Get()
{
var rng = new Random();
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use thread-safe Random instance.

Creating a new Random instance per request can lead to the same seed being used in concurrent requests. Consider using Random.Shared or inject IRandomGenerator.

-            var rng = new Random();
+            // Use thread-safe shared instance
+            var rng = Random.Shared;
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
var rng = new Random();
// Use thread-safe shared instance
var rng = Random.Shared;


app.UseRouting();

app.UseAuthorization();
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Remove unnecessary authorization middleware

This appears to be a simple example API with no authentication requirements. The controller endpoints are public, and no authorization attributes or authentication packages are present. Instead of adding authentication, you should remove the unnecessary authorization middleware:

 app.UseRouting();
-app.UseAuthorization();
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify authentication configuration.

Authorization middleware is configured but there's no authentication setup.

Consider adding authentication configuration before authorization:

 app.UseRouting();
+
+app.UseAuthentication();
 app.UseAuthorization();
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Error: No shell scripts found


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for authentication-related code in Startup.cs
echo "=== Searching Startup.cs for authentication configuration ==="
rg -A 5 -B 5 "UseAuthentication|AddAuthentication|Authentication" tooling/WebApiExample/Startup.cs

echo -e "\n=== Checking for authorization attributes usage ==="
# Search for [Authorize] attributes to determine if authentication is actually needed
ast-grep --pattern '[Authorize]'

echo -e "\n=== Looking for authentication service registration ==="
# Search for authentication service registration patterns
rg "AddAuthentication|AddJwtBearer|AddCookie|IAuthenticationService" tooling/WebApiExample/

Length of output: 608


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check project file for authentication packages
echo "=== Checking project file for auth packages ==="
cat tooling/WebApiExample/*.csproj

echo -e "\n=== Checking controllers ==="
# Look for controller endpoints
fd Controller.cs tooling/WebApiExample/ --exec cat {}

echo -e "\n=== Checking README or documentation ==="
fd README.md tooling/WebApiExample/ --exec cat {}

Length of output: 2063

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 30, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.81%. Comparing base (0bb116a) to head (2a63cb4).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main       #8   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   84.81%   84.81%           
=======================================
  Files          11       11           
  Lines         237      237           
  Branches        9        9           
=======================================
  Hits          201      201           
  Misses         36       36           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@gimlichael gimlichael merged commit d943fd7 into main Jan 30, 2025
19 checks passed
@gimlichael gimlichael deleted the v9.0.1/package-maintenance branch January 30, 2025 21:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant