Ossf/gha scorecard #7
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request include modifications to the CI/CD pipeline configurations in Changes
Possibly related PRs
Warning Rate limit exceeded@gimlichael has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 8 minutes and 40 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #7 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 84.81% 84.81%
=======================================
Files 11 11
Lines 237 237
Branches 9 9
=======================================
Hits 201 201
Misses 36 36 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/scorecard.yml (2)
1-10: Consider optimizing the schedule timing for better coverageThe workflow configuration looks good overall, with appropriate triggers for security monitoring. However, consider if the scheduled time (17:45 UTC on Tuesdays) aligns well with your team's working hours across different time zones for prompt response to any findings.
Consider adjusting the cron schedule if needed:
- - cron: '45 17 * * 2' + - cron: '0 12 * * 2' # Run at 12:00 UTC for better timezone coverage
32-38: Consider increasing the artifact retention periodA 5-day retention period for SARIF results might be too short for effective security tracking and analysis, especially for weekly scans.
Consider increasing the retention period:
- retention-days: 5 + retention-days: 30 # Keep results for a month for better tracking.github/workflows/pipelines.yml (1)
Line range hint
1-218: Consider adding SLSA provenance generationSince this workflow handles package publishing and includes security analysis, consider adding SLSA provenance generation to enhance supply chain security. This aligns well with the PR's security focus and the new scorecard workflow.
Example implementation:
deploy: if: github.event_name != 'pull_request' name: 🚀 Deploy v${{ needs.build.outputs.version }} runs-on: ubuntu-22.04 timeout-minutes: 15 needs: [build, pack, test, sonarcloud, codecov, codeql] environment: Production steps: + - name: Generate SLSA provenance + uses: slsa-framework/slsa-github-generator@v1 + with: + base64-subjects: ${{ needs.build.outputs.hashes }} - uses: codebeltnet/nuget-push@v1 with: token: ${{ secrets.NUGET_TOKEN }} configuration: ${{ inputs.configuration == '' && 'Release' || inputs.configuration }}🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: wrong new line character: expected \n
(new-lines)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/workflows/pipelines.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/scorecard.yml(1 hunks)README.md(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- README.md
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/scorecard.yml (2)
11-18: LGTM! Well-configured job permissions
The job configuration follows security best practices with properly scoped permissions and appropriate runner selection.
25-31:
Verify the scorecard-action version compatibility
The workflow specifies version 2.4.0 of ossf/scorecard-action, but this version might not exist. The latest stable version is 2.3.1.
Consider updating to the correct version:
- uses: ossf/[email protected]
+ uses: ossf/[email protected]✅ Verification successful
The scorecard-action version is correct and up-to-date
The workflow is using ossf/[email protected] which matches the latest release version (v2.4.0) from the official repository. No changes are needed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the latest release version of ossf/scorecard-action
gh api repos/ossf/scorecard-action/releases/latest --jq .tag_name
Length of output: 74
.github/workflows/pipelines.yml (2)
4-4: Verify branch protection rules for 'main'
Since the pipeline is now configured to only trigger on the 'main' branch, ensure that appropriate branch protection rules are in place to prevent direct pushes and require pull request reviews.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check branch protection rules for 'main' branch
gh api repos/:owner/:repo/branches/main/protection --jq '.required_status_checks, .required_pull_request_reviews, .enforce_admins'6-9: Review security implications of ignored paths
The .nuget/** exclusion pattern could potentially skip important package configuration changes. Consider:
- Limiting the ignore pattern to specific files (e.g.,
.nuget/packages.lock.json) - Adding required status checks for any changes to
.nuget/directory
This pull request includes several updates to GitHub workflows and documentation to improve CI/CD processes and security analysis. The most important changes include adding branch protection rules, scheduling security scans, and updating the paths to be ignored in the CI/CD pipeline.
GitHub Workflows Updates:
.github/workflows/pipelines.yml: Updated the branch specification to includemainand changed the paths-ignore pattern to be more comprehensive by including subdirectories and file extensions..github/workflows/scorecard.yml: Added a new workflow for Scorecard supply-chain security, including branch protection rules, a scheduled cron job, and steps for running analysis and uploading results.Documentation Updates:
README.md: Added a badge for OpenSSF Scorecard to the list of project badges to reflect the new security analysis workflow.Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements