doc: emphasize two words

chabulhwi · Oct 21, 2024 · 82e9269 · 82e9269
1 parent 348f7c0
commit 82e9269
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 2 changed files with 12 additions and 2 deletions.
diff --git a/docs/en/notes/chapter03/propositions.md b/docs/en/notes/chapter03/propositions.md
@@ -73,8 +73,8 @@ mathematical statement whose truth value we don't know yet. Both responded that
 
 However, they were divided on whether (b) is a proposition. One of them told
 that (b) is also a proposition since we *can* determine its truth or falsehood.
-The other argued that, linguistically speaking ("국어적으로 해석한다면"), we can
-determine the truth or falsehood of (b), but mathematically speaking, it can't
+The other argued that, *linguistically* speaking ("국어적으로 해석한다면"), we can
+determine the truth or falsehood of (b), but *mathematically* speaking, it can't
 be a proposition.
 
 ## References

diff --git a/docs/omegat/project_save.tmx b/docs/omegat/project_save.tmx
@@ -1807,6 +1807,16 @@ definitionally equal.</seg>
         <seg>두 함수 &lt;g2&gt;f&lt;/g2&gt;와 &lt;g3&gt;g&lt;/g3&gt;가 정의상 같으면 안 된다.</seg>
       </tuv>
     </tu>
+    <tu>
+      <tuv lang="en">
+        <seg>The other argued that, &lt;g2&gt;linguistically&lt;/g2&gt; speaking ("국어적으로 해석한다면"), we can
+determine the truth or falsehood of (b), but &lt;g3&gt;mathematically&lt;/g3&gt; speaking, it can't
+be a proposition.</seg>
+      </tuv>
+      <tuv lang="ko" changeid="chabulhwi" changedate="20241021T012349Z" creationid="chabulhwi" creationdate="20241021T012349Z">
+        <seg>다른 분은 (2)를 '국어적으로' 해석한다면 그것의 참과 거짓을 판별할 수 있지만, '수학적으로' 해석한다면 진릿값을 모르는 진술은 명제가 될 수 없다고 주장하셨습니다.</seg>
+      </tuv>
+    </tu>
     <tu>
       <tuv lang="en">
         <seg>The other argued that, linguistically speaking ("국어적으로 해석한다면"), we can