Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor AMR code to use new generic interface #56

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Jan 4, 2025
Merged

Conversation

cgarling
Copy link
Owner

@cgarling cgarling commented Jan 4, 2025

No description provided.

Also change struct fields to prep for generic AMR implementation.
`linear_amr_test_new.jl` covers all cases from previous `linear_amr_test.jl` and cases from `mzr_test.jl`. Since the linear AMR tests are fairly exhaustive WRT to the AMR API, we perhaps don't need as many tests for the logarithmic AMR model. Maybe just test things like calculate coeffs, make sure `fg!` runs, and so on?
During linesearch for BFGS it is possible for the algorithm to try a combination of slope and intercept that results in negative mass fractions, which causes `log10` to throw errors and interrupt the algorithm. We can avoid this scenario by returning `NaN` out of `MH_from_Z` instead of allowing `log10` to error.
Tried using chunking method but resulted in short MC chains with significant autocorrelations. Sticking to one chain per thread, even though it is slower on inhomogenous architectures. Also switched to `Iterators.partition` over my manual work assignment strategy.
@cgarling cgarling merged commit 1a0b8fb into MZR Jan 4, 2025
@cgarling cgarling deleted the AMR_refactor branch January 4, 2025 17:35
@cgarling cgarling mentioned this pull request Mar 3, 2025
cgarling referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2025
Removes the old AMR API. This version (1.0) will be the reference for the code version used in the paper.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant