refactor: assert moduleExports

[rtritto]

No description provided.

[brillout]

It's on purpose. I really think we should focus on features instead of internal refactoring :)

[brillout]

on features

I can share you our list of current priorities if you're interested.

[rtritto]

It's on purpose. I really think we should focus on features instead of internal refactoring :)

During my analysis, I found a minimal and simple refactor. Improve the readibility and the code, should always be accepted.

I can share you our list of current priorities if you're interested.

Sure, I can take a look.

[brillout]

It's on purpose. I really think we should focus on features instead of internal refactoring :)

During my analysis, I found a minimal and simple refactor. Improve the readibility and the code, should always be accepted.

These two assert() calls often fail. When this happens I want to know which one of these two fails simply by reading the stack trace, that's why deduping them is actually a regression. As I said before: please trust us with internal stuff 🙂

I can share you our list of current priorities if you're interested.

Sure, I can take a look.

How about one of the following?

• New Vike Extensions vikejs/vike#1715
• New Bati integrations
• Polish handli#6
• Automatic UI handling of network issues #103

WDYT?

[rtritto]

These two assert() calls often fail. When this happens I want to know which one of these two fails simply by reading the stack trace, that's why deduping them is actually a regression.

Good to know 👀

As I said before: please trust us with internal stuff 🙂

Of course. Anyway I/we can't know whether the code is correct or not, so trying (eg with PRs) may lead some positive results. Any help can bring improvements or innovative thoughts; also useful to the community since we are all moving in a common direction.

How about one of the following?

* [New Vike Extensions vikejs/vike#1715](https://github.com/vikejs/vike/issues/1715)

* [New Bati integrations](https://batijs.dev/)

* [Polish handli#6](https://github.com/brillout/handli/issues/6)

* [Automatic UI handling of network issues #103](https://github.com/brillout/telefunc/issues/103)

WDYT?

For the Bati integrations, I created solid-jotai.

For the Jotai integration, a new Vike extension is needed?

The two points of Handli and Telefunc aren't on my scope at the moment.

[brillout]

For the Jotai integration, a new Vike extension is needed?

👍 Sounds good, let's give it a try. How about for React i.e. vike-react-jotai?