Updated writeable.scroll

writeable.scroll

@@ -103,23 +103,27 @@ What is writing good for?
 
 ***
 
-Is it the author of the symbols that is most important, the symbols that are most important, or is it the user of the symbols that is most important?
+Is it the writer that is most important, the symbols, or the reader?
 
 ***
 
-Authors have clear incentive to create symbols since that very first symbol: symbols save lives.
+Writers have clear incentive to create symbols since that very first symbol: symbols save lives.
 
 Even if it's not your own life, or your child's life, even if it's a complete stranger's life, we have learned that a civilization of strangers cooperating peacefully create a better world for all.
 
+But writing goes out of date, and if the writer doesn't update their symbols, they can mislead as easily as they can lead.
+
+It can't be the writer that is most important.
+
 ***
 
-The symbols themselves, without humans, are literally meaningless. So it can't be that.
+The symbols themselves, without humans, are literally meaningless. So it can't be the symbols that are most important.
 
 ***
 
-It is clear the most important thing is that the rules around symbols should benefit the users of symbols.
+Thus it is clear the most important thing is that the rules around symbols should benefit the readers.
 
-What can we do to equip users with the best symbols possible?
+What can we do to equip readers with the best symbols possible?
 
 ***
 
@@ -159,6 +163,8 @@ And by doing that, they lead people to slaughter.
 
 ***
 
+To make symbols the best for readers, symbols must always be writeable.
+
 All symbols should be writeable.
 
 Do not trust anyone who wants to restrict your rights to write.