[pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks

for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci

paper-review-3.md

@@ -30,4 +30,4 @@ Since Gemmi provided sufficient parsing capabilities for our tasks, we have not
 
 > I feel this submission is borderline on the "Substantial scholarly effort" front, given the guidelines at https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#substantial-scholarly-effort I am not convinced by the text that the library was crucial in the three examples listed by the authors in the applications section; perhaps this could be expanded? Perhaps even the functionality from the other related packages by the author listed in the paper (SAF and CBA) could be exposed in the cifcheck namespace as (effectively) one package?
 
-Yes, cikfit and its applications are actively used by approximately 4-5 research groups. The SAF and CBA modules each have their own descriptions in respective journal publications, making it challenging to consolidate them under a broad `cifkit' umbrella. We would prefer to serve as an 'engine' that provides advanced functionality. However, features will continue to be developed on demand, primarily for experimental groups led by Prof. Oliynyk, both within his group and through his active collaborations.
+Yes, cikfit and its applications are actively used by approximately 4-5 research groups. The SAF and CBA modules each have their own descriptions in respective journal publications, making it challenging to consolidate them under a broad `cifkit' umbrella. We would prefer to serve as an 'engine' that provides advanced functionality. However, features will continue to be developed on demand, primarily for experimental groups led by Prof. Oliynyk, both within his group and through his active collaborations.