-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
515 helper link functionality #530
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces comprehensive changes to the helper link functionality across the backend and frontend. The modifications include adding new columns to the database migration, updating the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested Reviewers
Tip 🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
backend/migrations/0001-1.0-helperlink.js (3)
9-47
: Check your references, or you might lose yourselfHis palms are sweaty, knees weak, arms are heavy, but your table definitions look stable. Be sure your 'users' table reference matches the actual table name if your database is case-sensitive. Also, indexing 'createdBy' can help performance when querying large datasets.
49-58
: Be mindful of your 255-character limitEven if mom’s spaghetti is on the menu, sometimes URLs are longer than expected. Consider whether 255 characters is enough or if your use case might require a bigger limit to prevent future migrations.
71-80
: Clarify 'absolutePath' usageArms are heavy, but remember that an absolute path column can be confusing without a clear definition of how it's used. A quick doc comment or additional migration note outlining valid path types can prevent confusion down the road.
backend/src/models/HelperLink.js (1)
29-29
: These hardcoded colors are making my knees weak! Let's make them reusable!The default hex colors are duplicated across the codebase. Consider extracting them to a constants file.
Create a new file
constants/colors.js
:export const COLORS = { DEFAULT_BACKGROUND: '#F8F9F8', DEFAULT_FONT: '#344054', DEFAULT_ICON: '#7F56D9', };Then update the model:
- defaultValue: '#F8F9F8', + defaultValue: COLORS.DEFAULT_BACKGROUND,Also applies to: 39-39, 49-49
frontend/src/services/linksProvider.jsx (1)
37-37
: Arms are heavy! Let's validate these defaults on initialization!The default values are used directly without validation.
Add validation on initialization:
- const [helper, setHelper] = useState(DEFAULT_VALUES); + const [helper, setHelper] = useState(() => { + try { + // Validate default values + Object.entries(DEFAULT_VALUES).forEach(([key, value]) => { + if (key.includes('Color') && !value.match(/^#[0-9A-F]{6}$/i)) { + throw new Error(`Invalid color format for ${key}`); + } + if (key === 'url' && !value.match(/^(\/|https?:\/\/).+/)) { + throw new Error('Invalid URL format'); + } + }); + return DEFAULT_VALUES; + } catch (error) { + console.error('Default values validation failed:', error); + return {}; + } + });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
backend/migrations/0001-1.0-helperlink.js
(2 hunks)backend/src/models/HelperLink.js
(3 hunks)backend/src/utils/helperLink.helper.js
(1 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/hints/CreateHintPage.jsx
(0 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/links/LinkPage.module.scss
(2 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/links/LinkPageComponents/LinkAppearance.jsx
(4 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/links/LinksDefaultPage.jsx
(1 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/links/NewLinksPopup.jsx
(2 hunks)frontend/src/services/helperLinkService.js
(5 hunks)frontend/src/services/linksProvider.jsx
(2 hunks)frontend/src/utils/guideHelper.js
(1 hunks)frontend/src/utils/linkHelper.js
(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- frontend/src/scenes/hints/CreateHintPage.jsx
🔇 Additional comments (13)
backend/migrations/0001-1.0-helperlink.js (1)
60-69
: Confirmed 'active' default is setKnees might be weak, but this boolean column is sturdy. Using
allowNull: false
and defaulting totrue
is clear. Double-check if there's any scenario where you need a three-state logic before finalizing.frontend/src/utils/guideHelper.js (1)
6-6
: Handle unexpected error structures gracefullyMom’s spaghetti might be on the line, so ensure
error.response.data.errors[i].msg
is always defined. Consider a fallback ifmsg
is missing or has an unexpected format.frontend/src/utils/linkHelper.js (2)
34-37
: Validate large and varied URLsKnees weak, but this is good progress. The
validateUrl
function allows absolute or relative paths, though keep in mind your user might paste an extremely long domain. The max length of 2000 is helpful—just confirm your environment can handle that.
47-48
: Confirm expected boolean usageArms are heavy, but toggling
active
andabsolutePath
is straightforward. Ensure your forms and API calls never pass these as strings or other types.frontend/src/services/helperLinkService.js (3)
25-37
: Validation looking fresh, fam! 🔥The validation messages are clear, descriptive, and cover all required fields.
76-78
: Consistency is key, and this is looking 💯!The new fields are consistently implemented in both
createHelper
andupdateHelper
functions.
51-53
: Hold up! We're missing some validation checks!The new fields
url
,active
, andabsolutePath
are added to the payload but aren't validated in thevalidateHelper
function. Consider adding validation for these fields to maintain data integrity.frontend/src/scenes/links/NewLinksPopup.jsx (2)
12-12
: Straight fire! 🔥 Moving those default values to a central location!Good practice moving the default values to a centralized provider. This improves maintainability and consistency.
44-44
: Clean initialization with DEFAULT_VALUES! 👊Using
DEFAULT_VALUES
instead of empty objects ensures all fields are properly initialized with consistent default values.Also applies to: 74-74
frontend/src/scenes/links/LinkPageComponents/LinkAppearance.jsx (2)
25-29
: Switch handling looking clean! ✨Good implementation of the switch value handling for
active
andabsolutePath
fields.
67-90
: URL input implementation is on point! 🎯The URL input field follows the same pattern as other fields with proper validation and error handling.
frontend/src/scenes/links/LinkPage.module.scss (2)
72-75
: Flexbox game strong! 💪Clean implementation of the row layout using flexbox for the switch components.
94-96
: Error styling looking fresh! 🎨Good use of CSS variables for error styling, maintaining consistency with the design system.
frontend/src/scenes/links/LinkPageComponents/LinkAppearance.jsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
frontend/src/scenes/links/LinkPageComponents/LinkAppearance.jsx (1)
Line range hint
176-178
: Yo! PropTypes are out of sync with the component signature! 🍝The PropTypes still require
handleSaveHelper
but it's been removed from the component parameters. This mismatch could confuse other developers.Remove the PropTypes validation since the prop is no longer used:
-LinkAppearance.propTypes = { - handleSaveHelper: PropTypes.func.isRequired, -};
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
frontend/src/scenes/links/LinkPageComponents/LinkAppearance.jsx (3)
23-27
: Let's make this spaghetti code more robust! 🍝The value destructuring could be safer. Consider using default values to prevent potential undefined errors.
Here's a safer implementation:
- const { name, checked } = e.target; - let { value } = e.target; + const { name = '', checked = false, value: targetValue = '' } = e.target; + let value = targetValue; if (name === 'active' || name === 'absolutePath') { value = checked; }
Line range hint
32-37
: Validation looking heavy like mom's spaghetti! 🍝The form has both
validateOnBlur={true}
and manualvalidateField
calls inonBlur
handlers. This creates redundant validation calls.Since
validateOnBlur
is alreadytrue
, you can remove the manualvalidateField
calls from theonBlur
handlers to optimize performance.
89-103
: These switch components are looking like copy-pasta! 🍝The Switch component implementations for
absolutePath
andactive
are very similar. Consider extracting this pattern into a reusable component.Create a new component like
SwitchField
that encapsulates this pattern:const SwitchField = ({ id, name, label, value, onChange }) => ( <label htmlFor={id} className={`${styles.appearance__label} ${styles.row}`}> <span>{label}</span> <Switch id={id} name={name} onChange={onChange} value={value} /> </label> ); // Usage: <SwitchField id="absolutePath" name="absolutePath" label="Display only in absolute path?" value={values.absolutePath} onChange={(e) => { handleChange(e); handleHelperChange(e); }} />Also applies to: 152-166
backend/src/test/e2e/helperLink.test.mjs (1)
370-377
: Mom's spaghetti suggestion: Consider consolidating URL validations.Having two identical URL validation messages might confuse users. Consider consolidating them into a single message or making them more specific if they validate different URL fields.
errors: [ 'ID must be an integer', 'Header is required', - 'Invalid value for url', - 'Invalid value for url', + 'Invalid value for helper URL', + 'Invalid value for link URL', 'Invalid value for absolutePath', 'links must be an array', ],
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
backend/src/test/e2e/helperLink.test.mjs
(3 hunks)backend/src/test/mocks/helperLink.mock.js
(6 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/links/LinkPageComponents/LinkAppearance.jsx
(5 hunks)frontend/src/tests/scenes/links/NewLinksPopup.test.jsx
(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- backend/src/test/mocks/helperLink.mock.js
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: build (22.x)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
frontend/src/tests/scenes/links/NewLinksPopup.test.jsx (1)
188-188
: Straight fire change on that title input selection! 🔥Switching to
getByLabelText
is a solid improvement - it's more resilient and follows testing best practices by testing the way users interact with the form.frontend/src/scenes/links/LinkPageComponents/LinkAppearance.jsx (1)
Line range hint
11-21
: Clean context implementation! 👊Good job implementing proper context validation and error handling. The focus management with useEffect is also a nice touch for accessibility.
backend/src/test/e2e/helperLink.test.mjs (3)
217-217
: Yo, this destructuring looks clean!The simplified destructuring makes the code more readable and maintainable.
271-271
: Same clean destructuring here!Consistent with the earlier change, keeping the codebase style uniform.
370-377
: Hold up! We need to verify these validation messages.The new validation errors for
url
andabsolutePath
fields look good, but there's something sus about having two identical URL validation messages.Let's check the validation logic in the helper file:
✅ Verification successful
The duplicate URL validation messages are actually correct! 🍝
The validation chain for the URL field has two separate checks that use the same error message:
- String type validation
- Custom URL format validation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find and display the validation logic for helper links ast-grep --pattern 'function validate$_($$$) { $$$ }'Length of output: 57
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find validation-related files fd validation # Search for URL validation patterns rg -i "url.*validation" -A 5 -B 5 # Look for helper link related files fd helperLength of output: 5834
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check helper link validation logic cat backend/src/utils/helperLink.helper.js # Check helper link model for schema validation cat backend/src/models/HelperLink.js # Also check the test file itself for context cat backend/src/test/e2e/helperLink.test.mjsLength of output: 25939
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
backend/src/test/e2e/link.test.mjs
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: build (22.x)
Looks good! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
frontend/src/scenes/links/LinkPageComponents/LinkAppearance.jsx (1)
179-181
: Yo! PropTypes are out of sync with the component signature! 🍝The component no longer accepts
handleSaveHelper
prop, but PropTypes still requires it. This mismatch could cause confusion and runtime warnings.Apply this diff to fix the PropTypes:
-LinkAppearance.propTypes = { - handleSaveHelper: PropTypes.func.isRequired, -}; +LinkAppearance.propTypes = {};
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
frontend/src/scenes/links/LinkPageComponents/LinkAppearance.jsx (2)
94-106
: Mom's spaghetti alert! Let's clean up this Switch logic! 🍝The
absolutePath
switch uses inverted logic with double negation, making it harder to understand. We can simplify this by removing the value inversion.Apply this diff to simplify the logic:
<Switch id="absolutePath" name="absolutePath" onChange={(e) => { - handleChange({ - target: { ...e.target, value: !e.target.value }, - }); - handleHelperChange({ - target: { ...e.target, value: !e.target.value }, - }); + handleChange(e); + handleHelperChange(e); }} - value={!values.absolutePath} + value={values.absolutePath} />
65-88
: Let's make that URL validation message more helpful! 🍝The URL field's error message could be more descriptive to help users understand what constitutes a valid URL.
Add a helper text below the input field:
<label htmlFor="url" className={styles.appearance__label}> URL (can be relative){' '} <input type="text" id="url" className={`${styles.appearance__input} ${ errors.url && styles.error }`} name="url" value={values.url || ''} onChange={(e) => { handleChange(e); handleHelperChange(e); }} onBlur={(e) => { handleBlur(e); handleHelperChange(e); validateField('url'); }} /> + <small className={styles.appearance__helper}> + Enter a valid URL (e.g., /help or https://example.com) + </small> {errors.url && ( <span className={styles.appearance__error}>{errors.url}</span> )} </label>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
frontend/src/scenes/links/LinkPageComponents/LinkAppearance.jsx
(5 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: build (22.x)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
frontend/src/scenes/links/LinkPageComponents/LinkAppearance.jsx (1)
32-38
: Formik configuration is on point! 👌The Formik configuration with
enableReinitialize
,validateOnMount
, andvalidateOnBlur
is well thought out and follows best practices.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- Show on dependent pages switch doesn't work
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🔭 Outside diff range comments (4)
frontend/src/scenes/links/LinkPageComponents/LinkAppearance.jsx (1)
178-180
: Yo! PropTypes are out of sync with the component signature! 🍝The component no longer accepts
handleSaveHelper
prop, but PropTypes still declares it as required. This mismatch could cause confusion and runtime warnings.Remove the PropTypes declaration since the prop is no longer used:
-LinkAppearance.propTypes = { - handleSaveHelper: PropTypes.func.isRequired, -};frontend/src/components/Links/Settings/Settings.jsx (2)
54-89
: Lose yourself in the error handling, the moment you own it!The
handleClose
function needs better error handling and async/await usage:
- URL validation throws but doesn't handle the error gracefully
- State updates after validation could be more robust
const handleClose = async (e, info) => { e?.preventDefault(); + try { if (!info) { info = Array.from(settingsRef.current.querySelectorAll('input')).reduce( (acc, it) => ({ ...acc, [it.name]: it.name === 'target' ? it.value === 'true' : it.value, }), {} ); } if (!e) { e = { target: settingsRef.current }; } if (!info.title.trim() && !info.url.trim()) { toggleSettings(e); setLinkToEdit(null); return; } if (!validateUrl(info.url)) { - throw new Error('Invalid URL format'); + return; } if (linkToEdit) { setLinks((prev) => prev.map((it) => it.id === oldLink.id ? { ...info, id: oldLink.id } : it ) ); setLinkToEdit(null); toggleSettings(e); } else { setLinks((prev) => [...prev, { ...info, id: info.id }]); toggleSettings(e); } + } catch (error) { + console.error('Error in handleClose:', error); + } };🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 59-59: Avoid the use of spread (
...
) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce
) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2)
.
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
97-105
: There's vomit on his sweater already - fix this error handling!The form submission needs better error handling and user feedback:
onSubmit={async (values, { setSubmitting }) => { try { await handleClose(null, state); } catch (error) { - return; + // Show error to user + console.error('Form submission failed:', error); + // Add toast or error message component here } finally { setSubmitting(false); } }}backend/src/service/helperLink.service.js (1)
57-61
: Console.log? More like console.nope! 🍝Error logging needs to be more robust for production environment.
- console.log(e); + const errorMessage = `Failed to create helper: ${e.message}`; + console.error(errorMessage, { error: e, data, links }); await t.rollback(); - throw new Error("Error creating helper"); + throw new Error(errorMessage);
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
frontend/src/scenes/links/LinkPageComponents/LinkAppearance.jsx (4)
22-32
: Mom's spaghetti alert! Let's clean up this event handler! 🍝The logic for handling different input types could be more straightforward. The negation of
checked
forabsolutePath
is particularly confusing.Consider this cleaner implementation:
const handleHelperChange = (e) => { - const { name, checked } = e.target; - let { value } = e.target; - if (name === 'active') { - value = checked; - } - if (name === 'absolutePath') { - value = !checked; - } + const { name, checked, value: inputValue } = e.target; + const value = name === 'active' ? checked + : name === 'absolutePath' ? !checked + : inputValue; setHelper((prev) => ({ ...prev, [name]: value })); };
68-91
: URL validation could use some real-time love! 🍝The URL field only validates on blur. For better UX, consider adding real-time validation feedback.
Add validation on change:
onChange={(e) => { handleChange(e); handleHelperChange(e); + validateField('url'); }}
96-96
: These Switch labels could use more sauce! 🍝The labels "Show on dependent pages?" and "Helper link is active?" could be more descriptive to better explain their purpose.
Consider more descriptive labels:
- "Display helper on all child pages?"
- "Enable this helper link?"
Also applies to: 159-159
107-154
: Spaghetti alert! DRY up those color inputs! 🍝There's significant duplication in the ColorInput components' event handling logic.
Consider creating a wrapper component:
const ColorInputWithHelper = ({ name, value, title, className, errors }) => ( <ColorInput id={`${name}-id`} name={name} value={value} onChange={(e) => { handleChange(e); handleHelperChange(e); }} onBlur={(e) => { handleBlur(e); handleHelperChange(e); }} error={errors[name]} title={title} className={className} /> );Then use it like:
<ColorInputWithHelper name="headerBackgroundColor" value={values.headerBackgroundColor} title="Header background color" className="header" errors={errors} />frontend/src/components/Links/Settings/Settings.jsx (1)
21-22
: Yo dawg, we need to talk about this state management!Managing state in both local
useState
and Formik could lead to synchronization headaches. Consider letting Formik handle all form state to keep it clean like mom's spaghetti.- const [state, setState] = useState(linkToEdit ?? defaultState); + // Let Formik handle all form statebackend/src/service/helperLink.service.js (1)
84-92
: There's vomit on his sweater already - this Promise.all needs validation!Add validation to ensure linksToUpdate contains valid data before processing.
+ if (linksToUpdate.some(item => !item.id)) { + throw new Error('Invalid link data: missing id in update operation'); + } await Promise.all( linksToUpdate.map(async (item) => { const { id: linkId, ...link } = item; return await Link.update( { ...link, helperId: id }, { transaction: t, where: { id: linkId } } ); }) );
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
backend/migrations/0001-1.0-helperlink.js
(1 hunks)backend/migrations/0011-1.1-helperlink.js
(1 hunks)backend/src/service/helperLink.service.js
(2 hunks)frontend/src/components/Links/Settings/Settings.jsx
(6 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/links/LinkPageComponents/LinkAppearance.jsx
(5 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- backend/migrations/0001-1.0-helperlink.js
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
backend/migrations/0011-1.1-helperlink.js
[error] 1-1: Redundant use strict directive.
The entire contents of JavaScript modules are automatically in strict mode, with no statement needed to initiate it.
Safe fix: Remove the redundant use strict directive.
(lint/suspicious/noRedundantUseStrict)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: build (22.x)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
backend/migrations/0011-1.1-helperlink.js (1)
19-21
: URL length limit might be too restrictive!Consider increasing the VARCHAR length for URLs or using TEXT type to handle longer URLs.
✅ Verification successful
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there are any existing URLs in the codebase longer than 255 chars rg -l 'https?://[^\s]{255,}'Length of output: 30
I'm going to run an enhanced verification script that walks through the repository with Python and reports any URLs that are at least 255 characters long so that we can be totally sure if there's any occurrence that might require a longer column definition. This additional script will help us gather the necessary details for proper manual verification.
Once this script is run, please check the output manually to confirm whether any URLs exceeding 255 characters are being stored in the codebase. If none are found, the current limit may be acceptable in practice; however, it's wise to remain cautious if future data might exceed this threshold.
His palms are sweaty, knees weak, arms are heavy – let's make sure our URL strategy is strong and ready!
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash python - <<'EOF' import os import re url_pattern = re.compile(r'https?://\S+') found = False # Walk through all files in the repository. for root, dirs, files in os.walk("."): # Skip directories that are not relevant. if "node_modules" in dirs: dirs.remove("node_modules") if "dist" in dirs: dirs.remove("dist") if "build" in dirs: dirs.remove("build") for file in files: file_path = os.path.join(root, file) try: with open(file_path, "r", encoding="utf-8") as f: for line in f: for url in url_pattern.findall(line): if len(url) >= 255: print(f"{file_path}: {url}") found = True except Exception: continue if not found: print("No URLs of length >=255 found.") EOFLength of output: 41
URL Length Limit Verification
Based on the additional checks, no URLs with a length of 255 characters or greater were found anywhere in the repository. It appears that, at least for now, the use of
Sequelize.STRING(255)
is sufficient. His palms are sweaty, knees weak, arms are heavy – no oversized URLs were detected in our scan!backend/src/service/helperLink.service.js (1)
44-62
: This function's got the right spaghetti code - it's working well!The createHelper implementation with bulk create is clean and efficient. Good job on using transactions and proper error handling structure.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
backend/migrations/0011-1.1-helperlink.js (2)
1-1
: Yo dawg, let's drop that 'use strict' like it's hot!The 'use strict' directive is redundant in ES modules as they're automatically in strict mode.
-'use strict';
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 1-1: Redundant use strict directive.
The entire contents of JavaScript modules are automatically in strict mode, with no statement needed to initiate it.
Safe fix: Remove the redundant use strict directive.(lint/suspicious/noRedundantUseStrict)
15-24
: URL column looking fresh and clean!The URL column definition with a default value of '/' and non-null constraint is well thought out. However, consider adding a URL validation pattern to ensure only valid URLs are stored.
{ type: Sequelize.STRING(255), allowNull: false, defaultValue: '/', + validate: { + isUrl: true, + }, },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
backend/migrations/0011-1.1-helperlink.js
(1 hunks)backend/src/service/helperLink.service.js
(6 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- backend/src/service/helperLink.service.js
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
backend/migrations/0011-1.1-helperlink.js
[error] 1-1: Redundant use strict directive.
The entire contents of JavaScript modules are automatically in strict mode, with no statement needed to initiate it.
Safe fix: Remove the redundant use strict directive.
(lint/suspicious/noRedundantUseStrict)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: build (22.x)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
backend/migrations/0011-1.1-helperlink.js (3)
12-52
: Mom's spaghetti alert: Error handling needs some sauce!The catch block is swallowing errors without logging or propagating them. This could make debugging migration failures harder than finding the last M&M in the bowl.
- } catch { + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to execute helper link migration:', error); await transaction.rollback(); + throw error; }Also, props on using transactions to keep the database changes atomic! 🍝
54-64
: Same spaghetti, different plate - Fix error handling in down migration!The down migration has the same error handling issue as the up migration.
- } catch { + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to rollback helper link migration:', error); await transaction.rollback(); + throw error; }
57-61
: The rollback sequence is on point!The down migration correctly removes all columns in a transaction. Nice work keeping it clean and organized!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
backend/src/test/unit/services/helperLink.test.js (1)
139-139
: Add parameter validation for bulk creation.While the test covers the call expectations, it would be more robust to validate the parameters passed to
bulkCreate
.Add parameter validation like this:
expect(LinkMock.bulkCreate.called).to.be.true; +const bulkCreateParams = LinkMock.bulkCreate.getCall(0).args; +expect(bulkCreateParams[0]).to.deep.equal( + mocks.LinksList.map(({ id, ...link }) => link) +); +expect(bulkCreateParams[1]).to.deep.equal({ + transaction: { commit, rollback } +});Also applies to: 170-170, 178-178, 187-187, 198-198
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
backend/src/service/helperLink.service.js
(6 hunks)backend/src/test/unit/services/helperLink.test.js
(6 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- backend/src/service/helperLink.service.js
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: build (22.x)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
backend/src/test/unit/services/helperLink.test.js (2)
76-78
: LGTM! Proper transition to bulk creation.The test correctly validates the new bulk creation approach, including proper parameter validation and transaction handling.
Also applies to: 89-90
96-96
: LGTM! Proper error handling setup.The error test correctly sets up the bulk creation stub and verifies transaction rollback.
Describe your changes
Add new fields to helper link to activate/deactivate it and to choose to display in specific urls.
Issue number
#515
Please ensure all items are checked off before requesting a review: