-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 223
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove bower #130
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Remove bower #130
Conversation
077ea4f
to
7f4e3d9
Compare
@oncletom could I ask why bower support is being removed? |
@fiznool well, if people use bower they already have node and npm. If they do not use a build system, this is fine, the artefact will be available in the Bower is hardly maintained, and is more harmful than useful. It will happen only with the next release, What do you think? |
@oncletom I guess my concern is for more 'mature' projects build on an older toolchain set, still using bower, but still needing to add new features. I'm in that boat myself. For the most part, bower just works, and so I don't have a compelling reason (yet) to pull it out and use npm/browserify, etc. I'd rather docus on code maintenance and new features than swapping out my build tools.
Could you expand on this - I wasn't aware that Bower is considered harmful? |
Does it change many things if you pull a static file from |
I think my toolchain is a bit more complicated than that, since in dev mode the files are served directly, and so need to be in a place where express can see them - but conceptually it could be something similar. I guess this is ultimately my point though - I don't really want to faff around unless I have to! 😄 |
No description provided.