Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow storing the ratchet tree separately #214

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 12, 2024
Merged

Allow storing the ratchet tree separately #214

merged 4 commits into from
Nov 12, 2024

Conversation

mulmarta
Copy link
Contributor

This may be useful for applications. It will probably change / be simplified once we move to the new 1.x API. But the current way does not break backwards compatibility.

Note

TreeIndex is still stored in the state and it may get large.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 and MIT license.

@mulmarta mulmarta requested a review from a team as a code owner November 12, 2024 15:09
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.14%. Comparing base (b6d257e) to head (5706488).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #214      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.12%   90.14%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         175      175              
  Lines       31446    31495      +49     
==========================================
+ Hits        28341    28390      +49     
  Misses       3105     3105              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@tomleavy tomleavy merged commit eb221ce into main Nov 12, 2024
30 checks passed
@tomleavy tomleavy deleted the separate-tree branch November 12, 2024 16:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants