Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: upgrade lighthouse-ci to v12 #3635

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

anshgoyalevil
Copy link
Member

@anshgoyalevil anshgoyalevil commented Jan 31, 2025

Description

This PR upgrades the lighthouse CI version to v12.

Related issue(s)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated GitHub Actions workflow for Lighthouse CI to a newer version of the action.
    • Modified the artifact upload setting in the Lighthouse Audit step.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 31, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the GitHub Actions workflow file for Lighthouse CI by changing the version of the lighthouse-ci-action from version 10.1 to version 12.0. This includes modifying the action's reference hash in the .github/workflows/lighthouse-ci.yml file and changing the uploadArtifacts and temporaryPublicStorage parameters from true to false. The overall structure and conditions of the workflow remain unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/lighthouse-ci.yml Updated lighthouse-ci-action from commit 03becbfc54 to 2f8dda6cf4 (version 10.1 to 12.0) and changed uploadArtifacts and temporaryPublicStorage from true to false

Poem

🐰 Lighthouse Action, version new,
Auditing paths with metrics true,
From ten-point-one to twelve we leap,
Performance insights we'll now keep!
Hop, hop, GitHub workflow bright! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5735dd9 and a7d16a9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/lighthouse-ci.yml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/lighthouse-ci.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 180000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - asyncapi-website
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - asyncapi-website
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - asyncapi-website
  • GitHub Check: Test NodeJS PR - windows-latest

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 31, 2025

Deploy Preview for asyncapi-website ready!

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit a7d16a9
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/asyncapi-website/deploys/679cd359b2c28e0008092b26
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-3635--asyncapi-website.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 31, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (bca2a91) to head (a7d16a9).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master     #3635   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           20        20           
  Lines          732       732           
=========================================
  Hits           732       732           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@anshgoyalevil
Copy link
Member Author

/dnm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants