Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Perpendicular Baseline Harmonization with SearchAPI #248

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 24, 2024

Conversation

SpicyGarlicAlbacoreRoll
Copy link
Contributor

Changed

  • Baseline stacking no longer excludes products with missing state vectors from final stack, like SearchAPI

Added

  • Adds warning when scenes in stack are missing state vectors, and logs baseline warnings with ASF_LOGGER

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (99a2966) 89.82% compared to head (c9cf2b2) 89.98%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #248      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.82%   89.98%   +0.15%     
==========================================
  Files          54       54              
  Lines        2035     2046      +11     
==========================================
+ Hits         1828     1841      +13     
+ Misses        207      205       -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 89.98% <100.00%> (+0.15%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
asf_search/baseline/stack.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@SpicyGarlicAlbacoreRoll SpicyGarlicAlbacoreRoll merged commit 1efbbe0 into master Jan 24, 2024
3 checks passed
@SpicyGarlicAlbacoreRoll SpicyGarlicAlbacoreRoll deleted the perpendicular-baseline-harmonization branch January 24, 2024 18:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants