Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor workflow validation to improve query efficiency and ensure s… #562

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 7, 2025

Conversation

kooomix
Copy link
Contributor

@kooomix kooomix commented Jan 6, 2025

User description

…ingle result assertion


PR Type

Bug fix, Enhancement


Description

  • Refactored validate_workflow method for improved query efficiency.

  • Added filtering and sorting in workflow queries.

  • Ensured single result assertion for workflows.

  • Improved error messages for better debugging.


Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
jira_workflows.py
Refactor `validate_workflow` for efficiency and clarity   

tests_scripts/workflows/jira_workflows.py

  • Refactored validate_workflow to use filtered and sorted queries.
  • Replaced loop-based search with direct query result validation.
  • Enhanced assertions for workflow name, provider, and GUID.
  • Improved error messages for assertion failures.
  • +15/-11 

    💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

    Copy link

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 PR contains tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Query Limit

    The hardcoded pageSize of 150 workflows may be insufficient if the system has more workflows. Consider making this configurable or handling pagination.

    "pageSize": 150, 
    "pageNum": 1, 
    Error Handling

    The workflow validation assumes the response will always contain at least one workflow. Should add error handling for empty response array.

    workflow = workflows["response"][0]

    Copy link

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    Explore these optional code suggestions:

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Possible issue
    Add validation to prevent index out of bounds error when accessing response array

    Add error handling for empty response from get_workflows() to avoid potential
    IndexError when accessing workflows["response"][0].

    tests_scripts/workflows/jira_workflows.py [294-297]

     workflows = self.backend.get_workflows(body=body)
     assert workflows["total"]["value"] == 1, f"Expected total value to be equal to 1, but got {workflows['total']['value']}"
    +assert len(workflows["response"]) > 0, "No workflows found in response"
     workflow = workflows["response"][0]
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: The suggestion adds important defensive programming by checking for empty response array before accessing index 0, which could prevent runtime errors in edge cases where the response is empty despite total value being 1.

    7
    Add validation for required nested data structure before accessing it

    Add validation for the existence of the "notifications" array before accessing its
    first element to prevent potential KeyError or IndexError.

    tests_scripts/workflows/jira_workflows.py [299]

    +assert "notifications" in workflow and workflow["notifications"], "Workflow notifications array is missing or empty"
     assert workflow["notifications"][0]["provider"] == expected_provider
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: The suggestion adds crucial validation for the existence and non-emptiness of the notifications array before accessing it, preventing potential KeyError or IndexError exceptions in case of malformed workflow data.

    7

    Copy link

    github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2025

    Failed to generate code suggestions for PR

    @kooomix kooomix merged commit 49a69eb into master Jan 7, 2025
    2 checks passed
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants