Update base_vulnerability_scanning.py

[yuleib]

PR Type:

Refactoring

---

PR Description:

This PR increases the timeout value for various vulnerability scanning methods in the base_vulnerability_scanning.py script. This change is likely to provide more time for the scanning processes to complete, which could be beneficial in cases where the previous timeout was not sufficient.

---

PR Main Files Walkthrough:

files:

tests_scripts/helm/base_vulnerability_scanning.py: The timeout parameter for the wait_for_report method has been increased from 800 to 1250 in the get_container_cve method, from 600 to 1250 in the get_registry_container_cve and get_container_cve_without_filter_response methods, from 1200 to 1250 in the test_all_images_vuln_scan_reported method, and from 600 to 1250 in the test_cluster_deleted method.

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Analysis

• 🎯 Main theme: Increasing timeout values for various vulnerability scanning methods
• 📝 PR summary: This PR modifies the base_vulnerability_scanning.py script to increase the timeout values for various vulnerability scanning methods. This change is intended to provide more time for the scanning processes to complete, which could be beneficial in cases where the previous timeout was not sufficient.
• 📌 Type of PR: Refactoring
• 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
• ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 2, because the changes are straightforward and involve only the modification of timeout values in several methods.
• 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

• 💡 General suggestions: The changes made in this PR are straightforward and seem to be well-implemented. However, it would be beneficial to understand the reasoning behind these specific timeout values. If these values were determined empirically, it might be helpful to include a brief explanation or comment in the code.

• 🤖 Code feedback:

  • relevant file: tests_scripts/helm/base_vulnerability_scanning.py
    suggestion: Consider using a constant for the timeout value instead of hardcoding it in multiple places. This would make it easier to adjust the timeout in the future if needed. [important]
    relevant line: container_cve, time = self.wait_for_report(timeout=1250, report_type=self.backend.get_scan_results_details,

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve [--extended]: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. Extended mode employs several calls, and provides a more thorough feedback.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.
/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

To edit any configuration parameter from configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.

[github-actions]

PR Analysis

• 🎯 Main theme: Increasing timeout values in various vulnerability scanning methods
• 📝 PR summary: This PR modifies the timeout values for several methods in the base_vulnerability_scanning.py script. The changes are intended to provide more time for the scanning processes to complete, which could be beneficial in cases where the previous timeout was not sufficient.
• 📌 Type of PR: Refactoring
• 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
• ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 1, because the changes are straightforward and involve only the modification of timeout values in several methods.
• 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

• 💡 General suggestions: The changes in this PR are clear and straightforward. However, it would be beneficial to include a brief explanation or justification for the specific new timeout values chosen. This could help other developers understand the reasoning behind these changes and ensure that they are appropriate for the tasks at hand.

• 🤖 Code feedback:

  • relevant file: tests_scripts/helm/base_vulnerability_scanning.py
    suggestion: Consider defining the timeout value as a constant at the top of the file or as a configuration parameter. This would make it easier to adjust in the future and ensure consistency across all methods. [important]
    relevant line: container_cve, time = self.wait_for_report(timeout=1250, report_type=self.backend.get_scan_results_details,

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve [--extended]: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. Extended mode employs several calls, and provides a more thorough feedback.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.
/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

To edit any configuration parameter from configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.