chore: added git resource map consumption #38470
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces enhancements to the Git-related functionality across multiple server-side Java classes. The primary changes focus on improving Git resource map construction, JSON migration processes, and standardizing method signatures related to artifact and Git operations. The modifications aim to provide more flexible and consistent handling of Git references and artifact transformations. Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant GitController
participant GitService
participant FileUtils
Client->>GitController: Request Git Resource Map
GitController->>GitService: Construct Resource Map
GitService->>FileUtils: Fetch Git Resources
FileUtils-->>GitService: Return Resource Map
GitService-->>GitController: Return Constructed Map
GitController-->>Client: Respond with Git Resource Map
Possibly related PRs
Suggested Labels
Suggested Reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
github-actions
bot
added
the
skip-changelog
...server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/applications/git/ApplicationGitFileUtilsCEImpl.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/git/fs/GitFSServiceCEImpl.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
...r/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/applications/imports/ApplicationImportServiceCEImpl.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...h-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/solutions/ce/CreateDBTablePageSolutionCEImpl.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
1 similar comment
Failed server tests
|
Failed server tests
|
sondermanish
requested review from
sharat87,
abhvsn,
AnaghHegde and
a team
as code owners
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (17)
app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/git/autocommit/AutoCommitEventHandlerImplTest.java (1)
518-519: Enhance test coverage for multiple RefType values.
Only a generic matcher (any(RefType.class)) is used here. Consider introducing additional tests or parameterized testing to confirm behavior for each distinct RefType (e.g., BRANCH, TAG, COMMIT).app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/git/ops/GitCommitTests.java (1)
139-139: Use meaningful path strings in tests
A placeholder string"path"may limit test clarity and could be replaced with a more context-aware value for better maintainability.app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/git/fs/GitFSServiceCEImpl.java (3)
212-213: Consider unifying JSON construction methods for consistency.
You're callingconstructArtifactExchangeJsonFromGitRepositoryWithAnalyticshere, while line 617 callsconstructArtifactExchangeJsonFromGitRepository. If consistent instrumentation is desired for all reconstructions, consider streamlining to a single approach.
366-366: Use a more descriptive name thansaveArtifactToLocalRepoNew.
The suffix "New" might become confusing over time. A more specific name can better convey purpose or differences from the old method.
375-375: Validate error leakage or adjust logging strategy.
Returninge.getMessage()may reveal internal details. Consider either adding contextual info or logging the error while returning a more general message to the client.app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/migrations/JsonSchemaMigrationTest.java (1)
58-58: Confirm the new parameter usage logic.
Similar to the previous comment, please validate that passingnullfor the additional parameters won't cause issues. If these parameters are truly optional, consider a more explicit default or optional pattern to make the intent clearer.app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/applications/imports/ApplicationImportServiceCEImpl.java (1)
653-653: Avoid uninitialized refType
Explicitly initializingrefTypeto null can obscure actual usage. Consider providing a helpful default.app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/applications/git/ApplicationGitFileUtilsCEImpl.java (1)
476-485: Clean separation of migration logic
performJsonMigrationneatly delegates JSON upgrades. Consider logging potential errors for better observability.} catch (SomeException e) { + log.error("Json migration failed for {}", artifactExchangeJson, e); return Mono.error(e); }app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/helpers/ce/CommonGitFileUtilsCE.java (2)
163-175: Better error handling
Catching and returning aMono.error()is good. Consider capturing more context before throwing.
560-593: Analytics wrapper
Using analytics aroundconstructArtifactExchangeJsonFromGitRepositoryprovides insight. Watch for performance overhead.app/server/appsmith-interfaces/src/main/java/com/appsmith/external/git/FileInterface.java (1)
53-54: Consider adding robust documentation and error path handling.
The newly introducedconstructGitResourceMapFromGitRepomethod is a valuable addition. Please consider adding comprehensive Javadoc to clarify usage expectations and error conditions. This will help future maintainers understand the contract more easily.app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/git/central/CentralGitServiceCEImpl.java (6)
478-478: Revisit error handling.For
checkoutRemoteReference, ensure that any error leading to an invalidbaseArtifactorrefDTOis properly caught and handled to avoid partial checkouts.
733-733: Validate the baseArtifactId parameter.In
deleteGitReference, ensure the parameterbaseArtifactIdhas a valid format before proceeding. Consider adding unit tests to confirm correct handling of invalid IDs.
1477-1478: Enhance naming consistency.
getStatusAfterComparingWithRemoteandgetStatusshare similar responsibilities. Clarify method names or add docstrings to highlight differences, if any.
1491-1491: Guard isFileLock usage carefully.Take extra care with the
isFileLockflag to avoid locking issues under heavy concurrency. Possibly add a fallback or lock acquisition timeout check.
1873-1873: Watch out for partial references.When passing
RefType refType, ensure consistency with all usage references. Mismatched ref types can lead to incomplete fetch or checkout operations.
1878-1878: Revise exception messages.In
fetchRemoteChanges, refine error messages to be more descriptive. This might ease future debugging, especially if multiple steps can fail during the fetch process.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (24)
app/server/appsmith-git/src/main/java/com/appsmith/git/files/FileUtilsCEImpl.java(1 hunks)app/server/appsmith-interfaces/src/main/java/com/appsmith/external/git/FileInterface.java(1 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/applications/git/ApplicationGitFileUtilsCEImpl.java(3 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/applications/imports/ApplicationImportServiceCEImpl.java(2 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/git/central/CentralGitServiceCE.java(2 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/git/central/CentralGitServiceCEImpl.java(14 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/git/controllers/GitApplicationControllerCE.java(9 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/git/fs/GitFSServiceCEImpl.java(4 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/helpers/ce/ArtifactGitFileUtilsCE.java(2 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/helpers/ce/CommonGitFileUtilsCE.java(3 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/migrations/JsonSchemaMigration.java(3 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/solutions/ce/CreateDBTablePageSolutionCEImpl.java(2 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/git/CommonGitServiceCETest.java(1 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/git/autocommit/AutoCommitEventHandlerImplTest.java(3 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/git/autocommit/AutoCommitServiceTest.java(4 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/git/ops/GitCommitTests.java(4 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/git/ops/GitConnectTests.java(10 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/git/ops/GitDiscardTests.java(5 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/git/resourcemap/ExchangeJsonConversionTests.java(1 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/helpers/GitFileUtilsTest.java(1 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/imports/internal/ImportServiceTests.java(2 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/migrations/JsonSchemaMigrationTest.java(2 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/transactions/ImportApplicationTransactionServiceTest.java(1 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/utils/com/appsmith/server/git/ArtifactBuilderExtension.java(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (77)
app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/git/autocommit/AutoCommitEventHandlerImplTest.java (2)
6-6: New import for RefType introduced.
Looks good. This import is essential for referencing the new parameter in the migration method.
439-439: Consider verifying the RefType parameter’s value.
Currently, the test usesany(RefType.class). It might be beneficial to use a more specific matcher or an argument captor to ensure the actual RefType is passed correctly. This helps validate logic under different reference types.app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/transactions/ImportApplicationTransactionServiceTest.java (1)
133-134: Consider verifying the new parameter usage in tests
Including the new parameter withnullmight hide logic or scenarios that rely on a non-nullRefType. Ensure you either document or test the use ofnullto confirm no unintended side effects occur.app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/git/ops/GitCommitTests.java (3)
90-90: Ensure valid test data for local repo path
Returning an empty path might mask issues in actual scenarios. Consider confirming that this is intentional and needed for testing.
170-170: Validate the new parameter usage
The added"baseUrl"parameter should be verified downstream. Confirm it’s used or tested to ensure correctness.
228-228: Good coverage of repository not found scenario
This mock ensures the error path is tested thoroughly; great job.app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/imports/internal/ImportServiceTests.java (2)
364-365: Validate null usage for new method parameters
Consider verifying if null placeholders for the additional parameters can cause unintended behavior when migrating schemas.
2727-2728: Confirm partial copying and migration logic
Ensure that the partial copying of properties and subsequent migration both handle nested attributes safely.app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/git/fs/GitFSServiceCEImpl.java (1)
617-617: Check alignment with analytics usage in line 212.
Here,constructArtifactExchangeJsonFromGitRepositoryis invoked without “withAnalytics.” Verify that you don’t need additional logging or instrumentation as in line 212.app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/git/resourcemap/ExchangeJsonConversionTests.java (1)
107-107: Consider verifying the correctness of passing all-null parameters.Since the new method signature now accepts four parameters, and here all of them are null, please ensure the migration logic handles null values gracefully. This could prevent unforeseen NullPointerExceptions or other exceptions.
You can run this script to identify other usage sites of
migrateArtifactExchangeJsonToLatestSchemaand confirm whether null parameters are universally handled:✅ Verification successful
Let me check the implementation of the method to understand how null parameters are handled.
Let me check the implementation of migrateApplicationJsonToLatestSchema to ensure null parameters are handled properly.
Let me try a different approach to find the method implementation.
Passing null parameters appears to be safe in this context
From the evidence gathered:
- The method is used in multiple test files with null parameters consistently
- The implementation in
JsonSchemaMigration.javashows that it only usesartifactExchangeJsonfor type checking, whilebaseArtifactId,refName, andrefTypeare optional parameters passed through- The production usage in
ApplicationGitFileUtilsCEImpl.javashows proper parameter passing when needed🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Searching usage of the method across the codebase to check parameter usage rg -A 5 "migrateArtifactExchangeJsonToLatestSchema"Length of output: 9930
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find the implementation of migrateArtifactExchangeJsonToLatestSchema ast-grep --pattern 'public Mono<? extends ArtifactExchangeJson> migrateArtifactExchangeJsonToLatestSchema($$$) { $$$ }'Length of output: 1650
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find the implementation of migrateApplicationJsonToLatestSchema ast-grep --pattern 'private Mono<ApplicationJson> migrateApplicationJsonToLatestSchema($$$) { $$$ }'Length of output: 104
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for migrateApplicationJsonToLatestSchema implementation rg -A 10 "migrateApplicationJsonToLatestSchema.*\{"Length of output: 53
app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/utils/com/appsmith/server/git/ArtifactBuilderExtension.java (1)
115-115: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConsider providing non-null parameters or clarifying intent.
Currently, all additional parameters are passed asnull, which may lead to potential NullPointerExceptions or missed migrations if the method relies on them. If this is intentional, consider documenting why nulls are acceptable; otherwise, pass meaningful references or overload the function to match usage scenarios.To verify correctness and potential usage of these parameters elsewhere, run:
app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/migrations/JsonSchemaMigrationTest.java (1)
42-42: Check passing null parameters.
You are passingnullarguments for newly introduced parameters here. Confirm that your migration logic safely handles these null values, or consider introducing a default reference or fallback enum value rather than relying on null.app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/applications/imports/ApplicationImportServiceCEImpl.java (4)
3-3: Import statement usage
It's great to seeRefTypebeing imported. Ensure it's leveraged effectively to avoid null references.
657-657: Nice retrieval of refType
AccessinggetRefType()from the metadata is a good approach.
660-661: Validate fallback logic
EnsurerefNameandrefTypeare handled gracefully when absent to prevent migration errors.
647-647:⚠️ Potential issueNull refType might cause unexpected migrations
CallingmigrateApplicationJsonToLatestSchemawith nullrefTypecould break certain Git flows.- return jsonSchemaMigration.migrateApplicationJsonToLatestSchema(applicationJson, null, null, null); + return jsonSchemaMigration.migrateApplicationJsonToLatestSchema(applicationJson, null, null, RefType.branch /* or a valid fallback */);Likely invalid or redundant comment.
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/applications/git/ApplicationGitFileUtilsCEImpl.java (2)
33-33: Import statement
IncludingArtifactJsonTransformationDTOis consistent with the new JSON migration flow.
472-472: Explicitly using RefType.branch
PassingRefType.branchhelps clarify the reference context in JSON migrations.app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/helpers/ce/CommonGitFileUtilsCE.java (4)
33-33: New import for ArtifactJsonTransformationDTO
This aligns with the updated migration architecture.
595-620: Step-by-step reconstruction
constructArtifactExchangeJsonFromGitRepositoryis well-structured. Validate all fields ingitResourceMapto steer clear of partial data.
627-641: Metadata copy
copyMetadataToArtifactExchangeJsonhelps keep versioning consistent. Great job ensuring schema versions are stored.
643-649: Validation logic
isJsonTransformationDTOValidis straightforward. If adding more fields, keep them consistent here too.app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/helpers/ce/ArtifactGitFileUtilsCE.java (1)
33-34: New migration method
performJsonMigrationin this interface standardizes JSON transformation across implementations.app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/git/central/CentralGitServiceCE.java (9)
28-28: Reordered parameters
ArtifactType artifactTypenow appears early in the signature. Assure all caller methods are updated.
39-39: Consistent branching
Listing branches for an artifact with reordered parameters is more intuitive.
44-44: File-lock param usage
IncludingisFileLockensures clarity when fetching remote changes. Good improvement.
51-51: Refined method signature
getStatusclarifies whether remote comparison is desired.
57-57: checkoutReference
Rearranging the artifact type parameter is consistent with the broader signature structure.
63-63: createReference
Note that artifact type is placed earlier for uniformity across Git methods.
66-66: deleteGitReference
Make sure the new parameter order is tested thoroughly, including edge cases.
69-69: updateProtectedBranches
HousingartifactTypeearlier fosters consistent method signatures.
76-76: getAutoCommitProgress
The newly placed artifact type parameter clarifies which artifact's commit progress is retrieved.app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/migrations/JsonSchemaMigration.java (6)
3-3: Import forRefTypelooks good.
The import aligns well with the new reference-based approach. No concerns here.
45-47: Javadoc improvements confirm clarity.
The new Javadoc annotations forrefNameandrefTypeare clear and descriptive. Good work on clarifying parameter usage.
50-50: Updated method signature.
IncludingrefNameandRefTypein the signature enhances flexibility. Please ensure that the new parameters are thoroughly tested with various reference types to confirm correctness.
54-54: Type safety on casting.
CastingartifactExchangeJsontoApplicationJsonis valid if guaranteed at runtime. If there's any risk of encountering other artifact types, consider adding checks or exceptions for clarity.
61-61: Extended parameters for migration.
AcceptingrefNameandRefTypeinmigrateApplicationJsonToLatestSchemafurther generalizes the migration logic. Looks good.
71-71: Potential oversight:refTypeusage.
AlthoughrefTypeis introduced in the parents, it isn’t propagated here. Confirm whether omitting it frommigrateServerSchemais intentional or an oversight.app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/git/controllers/GitApplicationControllerCE.java (9)
71-71: New parameter ordering looks consistent.
connectArtifactToGitcorrectly includesArtifactTypebefore the DTOs. No issues spotted.
98-98: Consistent use of new parameter ordering.
createReferencenow properly takesArtifactTypebefore thegitRefDTO. All good.
107-107: Clearer readability with new argument sequence.
checkoutReferencecontinues the pattern of placingArtifactTypeup front, which helps maintain consistency across methods.
136-136: Method parameters are comprehensible.
getStatusincludescompareRemoteandGIT_TYPEin a logical order, matching the rest of the code changes.
147-147: RefType addition for remote fetching.
Enabling different references with therefTypeparameter infetchRemoteChangesis a good enhancement for Git workflows.
157-157: Delete reference maintains standard approach.
deleteGitReferencewith the new ordering remains consistent with allied service calls.
176-176: Branch protection updates remain straightforward.
PositioningArtifactTypebefore the branch list keeps uniformity with the other methods.
202-202: Auto-commit progress parameter alignment.
getAutoCommitProgressreferencesbranchNameafterArtifactType— consistent with the new standard.
222-222: Branch listing logic tidy.
listBranchForArtifactlikewise exhibits matching ordering. Everything looks harmonized across methods.app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/git/ops/GitDiscardTests.java (5)
123-123: New save method.
Replacing older methods withsaveArtifactToLocalRepoNewis fine but consider adding coverage to ensure any differences in behavior are validated.
154-154: Updated signature forconnectArtifactToGit.
PlacingArtifactTypeandGitConnectDTOearlier in the call aligns with the rest of the codebase changes.
170-170: Passing null for new parameters.
Here,refNameandrefTypeare null. Confirm if the migration logic gracefully handles this scenario.
201-201: Additional usage ofsaveArtifactToLocalRepoNew.
Ensure that repeated calls with the same arguments are thoroughly tested for correct file path resolution.
246-246: Repeated test call.
Verify that the underlying logic remains consistent across multiple test invocations ofsaveArtifactToLocalRepoNew.app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/helpers/GitFileUtilsTest.java (1)
87-88: Consider specifying a non-null RefType
Ensure this additional parameter is intentionally set tonull. If the migration requires a known reference (e.g. branch-related context), consider providing a more explicit value likeRefType.BRANCH.app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/git/ops/GitConnectTests.java (10)
87-87: Verify parameter reordering
The method call’s parameters now appear in a different order. Please confirm that all usages ofconnectArtifactToGitacross the codebase match this updated signature.
111-111: Verify parameter reordering
154-154: Verify parameter reordering
174-174: Verify parameter reordering
254-254: Verify parameter reordering
292-292: Verify parameter reordering
328-328: Verify parameter reordering
378-378: Verify parameter reordering
424-424: Verify parameter reordering
473-473: Verify parameter reorderingapp/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/git/autocommit/AutoCommitServiceTest.java (4)
5-5: Thank you for adding the RefType import
This import is now used to support multi-parameter schema migrations.
259-259: Validate the new RefType usage
Ensure that passingany(RefType.class)or a specificRefTypealigns with the intended test scenario.
548-548: Validate the new RefType usage
622-622: Validate the new RefType usageapp/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/solutions/ce/CreateDBTablePageSolutionCEImpl.java (2)
7-7: Import for RefType
This import clarifies the reference context used in schema migrations.
254-255: RefType usage in JSON migration
Good to seeRefType.branchspecified for clarity. This addresses the missing reference type in earlier calls and ensures consistent migration behavior.app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/git/central/CentralGitServiceCEImpl.java (6)
367-367: Parameter ordering is consistent but verify usage references.Looks like the parameter order has changed for
checkoutReference. Make sure that all callers reflect this new order consistently throughout the codebase.
426-426: Double-check finalRefName usage.Setting
jsonTransformationDTO.setRefName(finalRefName)is fine, but confirm that upstream references align with this final name for all subsequent operations.
563-563: Check for null or missing fields.When creating references, confirm that
referencedArtifactIdandrefDTOare validated for null or missing required fields to prevent unexpected failures down the line.
1483-1484: Ensure remote comparison logic is correct.When
compareRemoteis true, confirm that the code properly fetches and merges changes from remote. Missing or partial checks could lead to stale data in your output.
1871-1871: Validate refArtifactId carefully.In
fetchRemoteChanges, confirm that refArtifactId is not null or empty to avoid silent no-op or cryptic errors. Consider throwing an explicit exception if it's missing.
2395-2395: Consider boundary conditions.When dealing with
updateProtectedBranches, think about edge cases like an empty list or multiple default branches. This ensures robust behavior across all scenarios.app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/git/CommonGitServiceCETest.java (1)
295-296: Validate the additional parameter.Adding another parameter to
migrateArtifactExchangeJsonToLatestSchemais fine, but ensure that all solutions using the previous signature are properly updated to avoid runtime exceptions.app/server/appsmith-git/src/main/java/com/appsmith/git/files/FileUtilsCEImpl.java (1)
677-683: Confirm the need for an explicit checkout step.
constructGitResourceMapFromGitRepofetches the Git resource map but may need to ensure the correct checkout ofrefNamefirst. Verify that upstream code has performed the necessary checkout logic.
| * @param gitType Type of the service | ||
| * @return Map of json file names which are added, modified, conflicting, removed and the working tree if this is clean | ||
| */ | ||
| private Mono<GitStatusDTO> getStatus( | ||
| String branchedArtifactId, | ||
| ArtifactType artifactType, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Look out for potential concurrency pitfalls.
Multiple calls to getBaseAndBranchedArtifacts in a short time frame might need additional synchronization to prevent race conditions in code branches that depend on artifact states.
Failed server tests
|
Description
Fixes #
Issue Numberor
Fixes
Issue URLWarning
If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid.
Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Git" it=true
🔍 Cypress test results
Tip
🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12600209771
Commit: 8877a5b
Cypress dashboard.
Tags:
@tag.GitSpec:
Fri, 03 Jan 2025 16:35:41 UTC
Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
Based on the comprehensive summary of changes, here are the release notes:
Release Notes
Git Integration Enhancements
Method Signature Updates
Backend Improvements
Testing and Validation
These changes primarily focus on backend improvements to the Git integration system, providing more robust and flexible handling of artifacts and references.