Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add stream support #5

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 8, 2024
Merged

Add stream support #5

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 8, 2024

Conversation

apple-x-co
Copy link
Owner

@apple-x-co apple-x-co commented Dec 8, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced stream handling capabilities in the RequestDispatcher class.
    • Improved dependency injection for stream-related functionality in the DiBinder class.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Streamlined response body handling in the getResponse method.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 8, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the DiBinder and RequestDispatcher classes to enhance dependency injection and streamline stream management. In DiBinder, new imports for ResponseFactory and StreamFactory are added, and the requestDispatcher method is updated to accommodate the new ResponseFactoryInterface. In RequestDispatcher, the constructor now includes ResponseFactoryInterface and StreamFactoryInterface, and the getResponse method has been updated to utilize these interfaces for creating streams, improving the consistency of response handling.

Changes

File Change Summary
source/app/src/DiBinder.php - Added imports for ResponseFactory, StreamFactory, ResponseFactoryInterface, and StreamFactoryInterface.
- Updated requestDispatcher method to include ResponseFactoryInterface and retrieve StreamFactoryInterface.
source/app/src/RequestDispatcher.php - Updated constructor to include ResponseFactoryInterface and StreamFactoryInterface.
- Updated getResponse method to use responseFactory for creating responses and streamFactory for handling streams.

Possibly related PRs

  • Add stream support #4: The changes in the RequestDispatcher class involve the introduction of ResponseFactoryInterface and StreamFactoryInterface, which are directly related to the modifications made in the DiBinder class regarding stream management and dependency injection.

🐇 In the code, we hop and play,
Streams and factories lead the way.
With new imports, our paths align,
Handling responses, oh so fine!
A dance of data, swift and bright,
In our code, everything feels right! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
source/app/src/DiBinder.php (1)

204-204: LGTM: Clean integration of stream factory dependency

The streamFactory parameter is correctly injected using the container's lazy loading pattern. This change aligns well with PSR-7 stream handling best practices.

Consider documenting the stream handling strategy in your architectural documentation to help maintain consistency as the application grows. This could include:

  • When to use streams vs. direct string responses
  • Memory management considerations for large streams
  • Best practices for stream resource cleanup
source/app/src/RequestDispatcher.php (2)

61-61: LGTM: Well-structured StreamFactoryInterface injection

The addition of StreamFactoryInterface as a constructor dependency follows SOLID principles and maintains immutability with readonly modifier.

This change enhances the class's adherence to the Interface Segregation Principle (ISP) by depending on the specific StreamFactoryInterface rather than a broader interface.


208-208: Consider resource management for rendered content stream

The stream creation for rendered content is implemented correctly, but consider managing the stream's lifecycle.

Consider implementing a try-finally block to ensure proper resource cleanup:

-        $response = $response->withBody($this->streamFactory->createStream($renderer->render($object)));
+        try {
+            $stream = $this->streamFactory->createStream($renderer->render($object));
+            $response = $response->withBody($stream);
+        } catch (\RuntimeException $e) {
+            throw new InvalidResponseException('Failed to create response stream: ' . $e->getMessage());
+        }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 91fdb01 and e1fb383.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • source/app/src/DiBinder.php (4 hunks)
  • source/app/src/RequestDispatcher.php (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
source/app/src/DiBinder.php (2)

30-30: LGTM: Clean import additions for stream support

The new imports correctly follow PSR-7 standards by including both the interface and implementation for stream factory.

Also applies to: 52-52


191-192: Verify stream factory usage across the application

The StreamFactoryInterface binding is correctly configured using lazy initialization. However, let's verify its usage across the application to ensure consistent stream handling.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the results, I can generate the final response as we have sufficient information. The search results show that:

  1. There are no direct instantiations of StreamFactory using new StreamFactory()
  2. StreamFactoryInterface is properly used in dependency injection and type declarations
  3. The interface is consistently used in RequestDispatcher where stream factory functionality is needed

StreamFactoryInterface usage is consistent across the codebase

The verification confirms that the stream factory implementation follows best practices:

  • No direct instantiations of concrete StreamFactory class
  • Proper interface-based dependency injection in RequestDispatcher
  • Consistent usage of StreamFactoryInterface for type declarations
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent StreamFactoryInterface usage
# Look for any direct StreamFactory usage that should use the interface instead

# Check for direct StreamFactory usage
rg "new StreamFactory\(\)" --type php

# Check for StreamFactoryInterface usage
rg "StreamFactoryInterface" --type php -A 3

Length of output: 1510

source/app/src/RequestDispatcher.php (2)

36-36: LGTM: PSR-7 StreamFactoryInterface import

The addition of StreamFactoryInterface follows PSR-7 standards and is properly utilized in the code.


203-208: Verify StreamFactoryInterface implementation and registration

Let's ensure the StreamFactoryInterface is properly implemented and registered in the DI container.

✅ Verification successful

StreamFactoryInterface is properly implemented and registered

The verification shows that StreamFactoryInterface is correctly registered in the DI container:

  • It's properly bound in DiBinder.php using $di->set(StreamFactoryInterface::class, $di->lazyNew(StreamFactory::class))
  • The RequestDispatcher receives it via constructor injection as shown in the DI configuration
  • Laminas\Diactoros\StreamFactory is used as the concrete implementation
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for StreamFactoryInterface implementation and DI registration
echo "Checking for StreamFactoryInterface implementation..."
rg -l "implements\s+StreamFactoryInterface" 

echo "Checking for DI container registration..."
rg -l "StreamFactoryInterface.*bind|bind.*StreamFactoryInterface" 

Length of output: 323


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for StreamFactoryInterface usage and implementation
echo "Checking for StreamFactoryInterface usage..."
rg -l "StreamFactoryInterface"

echo "\nChecking for stream factory related files..."
fd -t f -e php ".*[Ss]tream.*[Ff]actory.*"

echo "\nChecking for PSR stream factory usage..."
rg -l "Psr\\\\Http\\\\Message\\\\StreamFactoryInterface"

Length of output: 555


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the DiBinder.php to see how StreamFactoryInterface is registered
echo "Checking DiBinder.php for StreamFactoryInterface registration..."
rg -A 5 -B 5 "StreamFactoryInterface" source/app/src/DiBinder.php

# Let's also check if there's any Laminas/Diactoros StreamFactory usage since it's a common implementation
echo "\nChecking for Laminas/Diactoros StreamFactory..."
rg -l "Laminas\\\\Diactoros\\\\StreamFactory"

Length of output: 1998

Comment on lines +203 to 204
$response = $response->withBody($this->streamFactory->createStreamFromResource($object->stream));

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add error handling for stream creation from resource

While the stream creation is correct, it should include error handling for cases where the resource is invalid or stream creation fails.

Consider wrapping the stream creation in a try-catch block:

-            $response = $response->withBody($this->streamFactory->createStreamFromResource($object->stream));
+            try {
+                $response = $response->withBody($this->streamFactory->createStreamFromResource($object->stream));
+            } catch (\RuntimeException $e) {
+                throw new InvalidResponseException('Failed to create stream from resource: ' . $e->getMessage());
+            }

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
source/app/src/RequestDispatcher.php (1)

208-208: Include Error Handling for Stream Creation

When creating a stream from rendered content, exceptions can occur. Wrap the stream creation in a try-catch block to handle potential exceptions from createStream, ensuring reliable response generation.

Consider applying this diff:

+            try {
                $response = $response->withBody($this->streamFactory->createStream($renderer->render($object)));
+            } catch (\RuntimeException $e) {
+                throw new InvalidResponseException('Failed to create stream: ' . $e->getMessage());
+            }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e1fb383 and 9272a9a.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • source/app/src/DiBinder.php (3 hunks)
  • source/app/src/RequestDispatcher.php (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
source/app/src/RequestDispatcher.php (4)

32-35: Proper Import of PSR Interfaces

Including ResponseFactoryInterface and StreamFactoryInterface from the Psr\Http\Message namespace ensures compliance with PSR-17 standards, promoting interoperability and decoupling from specific implementations.


59-61: Correct Dependency Injection of Factory Interfaces

Adding ResponseFactoryInterface and StreamFactoryInterface as dependencies in the constructor enhances flexibility and adheres to the Dependency Injection principle, improving testability and maintainability.


203-203: ⚠️ Potential issue

Add Error Handling for Stream Creation from Resource

Creating a stream from a resource may throw exceptions if the resource is invalid or stream creation fails. Implement error handling to manage potential exceptions and maintain robust response handling.

Apply this diff to include error handling:

+            try {
                $response = $response->withBody($this->streamFactory->createStreamFromResource($object->stream));
+            } catch (\RuntimeException $e) {
+                throw new InvalidResponseException('Failed to create stream from resource: ' . $e->getMessage());
+            }

197-197: Use Factory to Create Response Instances

Utilizing $this->responseFactory->createResponse() aligns with PSR-17 factory pattern standards and decouples response creation from concrete implementations. Ensure consistent use throughout the codebase.

Run the following script to identify any direct instantiations of Response:

✅ Verification successful

PSR-17 Response Factory Implementation Verified

The codebase consistently follows PSR-17 standards for response creation:

  • ResponseFactory is properly bound in DiBinder.php using dependency injection
  • No direct Response instantiations were found
  • All response-related code uses interfaces (ResponseInterface, ResponseFactoryInterface)
  • Response creation is properly handled through the factory pattern
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find occurrences of direct Response instantiation.

rg 'new\s+Response\b'

Length of output: 23


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive search for Response instantiation patterns
rg -i "new\s+(\\\\)?response|response\s*=\s*new" -g "*.php"

# Also search for Response class usage patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'use $$$Response;'

# Let's also check for any Response class definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'class Response'

Length of output: 383


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for PSR-17 ResponseFactory usage patterns
rg -i "responseFactory|ResponseFactoryInterface" -g "*.php"

# Also check for any Response-related imports
rg "use.*Response" -g "*.php"

# And look for any method signatures returning Response types
ast-grep --pattern 'function $_($_): Response'

Length of output: 2085

source/app/src/DiBinder.php (5)

30-31: Import Laminas Diactoros Factories

Adding ResponseFactory and StreamFactory from Laminas\Diactoros provides concrete implementations of PSR-17 factory interfaces, facilitating standardized response and stream creation.


52-54: Import PSR-17 Factory Interfaces

Including ResponseFactoryInterface and StreamFactoryInterface from Psr\Http\Message ensures that the code adheres to PSR-17, promoting interoperability with different HTTP message implementations.


193-194: Register StreamFactoryInterface in DI Container

The DI container correctly binds StreamFactoryInterface to the StreamFactory implementation, enabling dependency injection and adherence to the factory pattern.


200-201: Register ResponseFactoryInterface in DI Container

Binding ResponseFactoryInterface to ResponseFactory within the DI container ensures that response objects are created via the factory, promoting decoupling and compliance with PSR-17.


208-209: Inject Factory Interfaces into RequestDispatcher

Injecting ResponseFactoryInterface and StreamFactoryInterface into RequestDispatcher aligns with dependency injection best practices, enhancing modularity and allowing for easier testing and maintenance.

@apple-x-co apple-x-co merged commit 208e313 into main Dec 8, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant