Fix compile error.

[wangzhi-art]

Note: Please adhere to Contributing Guidelines.

Summary

fix compile error
CC: socket/listen.c chip/lpc17_40_i2c.c: In function 'lpc17_40_i2cbus_initialize': chip/lpc17_40_i2c.c:534:29: warning: 'priv' is used uninitialized [-Wuninitialized]
534 | flags = spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->spinlock);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
chip/lpc17_40_i2c.c:529:29: note: 'priv' was declared here
529 | struct lpc17_40_i2cdev_s *priv;
| ^~~~

Impact

none

Testing

CI

[nuttxpr]

[Experimental Bot, please feedback here]

No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements. While it provides a summary of the issue and indicates testing through CI, it lacks crucial information.

Here's what's missing:

• Summary: Needs more detail. Why was there a compile error? How was it fixed? What exactly changed in the code? A link to the related NuttX issue should be included.
• Impact: While stating "none" is acceptable if truly no impact, it's unlikely a compile error fix has zero impact. At minimum, the build process was previously broken and is now fixed, so "Impact on build: YES (Fixed compile error that prevented successful build)" is more appropriate.
• Testing: "CI" is insufficient. While CI testing is important, the PR should demonstrate local testing verification. This requires specifying the build host and target environment, along with providing specific "before" and "after" testing logs demonstrating the fix. Simply saying "compile error" doesn't show that the intended functionality now works correctly. Show the previous error message and the successful compilation/execution after the fix.

The submitter needs to expand on these sections to meet the NuttX PR requirements. A more complete example would be beneficial for reviewers.