Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

KAFKA-18383: Remove reserved.broker.max.id, broker.id.generation.enable, and broker.id #18478

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: trunk
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

FrankYang0529
Copy link
Member

The ZK mode is removed in 4.0, so we can remove related configuration as well.

Committer Checklist (excluded from commit message)

  • Verify design and implementation
  • Verify test coverage and CI build status
  • Verify documentation (including upgrade notes)

@github-actions github-actions bot added core Kafka Broker performance storage Pull requests that target the storage module tiered-storage Related to the Tiered Storage feature labels Jan 10, 2025
@@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ RemoteStorageManager createRemoteStorageManager() {

private void configureRSM() {
final Map<String, Object> rsmProps = new HashMap<>(rlmConfig.remoteStorageManagerProps());
rsmProps.put(ServerConfigs.BROKER_ID_CONFIG, brokerId);
rsmProps.put(KRaftConfigs.NODE_ID_CONFIG, brokerId);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

remote storage is using broker.id rather than node.id. see

final Integer brokerIdInt = (Integer) configs.get(BROKER_ID);

maybe we should align the naming for this internal config. @showuon FYI

@FrankYang0529 FrankYang0529 force-pushed the KAFKA-18383 branch 4 times, most recently from 938b911 to 5b685dc Compare January 20, 2025 01:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core Kafka Broker performance storage Pull requests that target the storage module tiered-storage Related to the Tiered Storage feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants