Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

reactor: refactor the code that does not comply with license requirements #7145

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: 2.x
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

slievrly
Copy link
Member

@slievrly slievrly commented Feb 8, 2025

  • I have registered the PR changes.

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR did

refactor some code

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

https://lists.apache.org/thread/wbq6jsykj2cd9nn91ys1b8r99bfl1h2r

Ⅲ. Why don't you add test cases (unit test/integration test)?

Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 8, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 51.56%. Comparing base (117e57a) to head (86e6a68).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##                2.x    #7145   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     51.56%   51.56%           
- Complexity     6812     6813    +1     
=========================================
  Files          1169     1169           
  Lines         41482    41489    +7     
  Branches       4851     4851           
=========================================
+ Hits          21389    21395    +6     
- Misses        18072    18073    +1     
  Partials       2021     2021           
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
.../logback/ExtendedArrowThrowableProxyConverter.java 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Member

@ptyin ptyin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM


return res;
//Return the final alternative result, or all if result has not changed
return result == null || result === obj ? all : result;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it should be ${res == null || res === obj ? all : res} to convert res to string if necessary.

@slievrly slievrly added the Do Not Merge Do not merge into develop label Feb 10, 2025
@slievrly slievrly removed the Do Not Merge Do not merge into develop label Feb 11, 2025
@slievrly slievrly added this to the 2.4.0 milestone Feb 11, 2025
@slievrly slievrly changed the title reactor: refactor some code reactor: efactor the code that does not comply with license requirements Feb 11, 2025
@slievrly slievrly changed the title reactor: efactor the code that does not comply with license requirements reactor: refactor the code that does not comply with license requirements Feb 11, 2025
@slievrly slievrly requested a review from ptyin March 6, 2025 15:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Process
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants