Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug](rollup) fallback and disable tulpe when rollup select failed on… #29482

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 4, 2024

Conversation

BiteTheDDDDt
Copy link
Contributor

… old planner (#29226)

  • fallback and disable tulpe when rollup select failed on old planner

  • add case

Proposed changes

pick from #29226

Further comments

If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion at [email protected] by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...

… old planner (apache#29226)

* fallback and disable tulpe when rollup select failed on old planner

* add case
@BiteTheDDDDt
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@github-actions github-actions bot added area/planner Issues or PRs related to the query planner kind/test labels Jan 3, 2024
@doris-robot
Copy link

(From new machine)TeamCity pipeline, clickbench performance test result:
the sum of best hot time: 48.69 seconds
stream load tsv: 565 seconds loaded 74807831229 Bytes, about 126 MB/s
stream load json: 20 seconds loaded 2358488459 Bytes, about 112 MB/s
stream load orc: 65 seconds loaded 1101869774 Bytes, about 16 MB/s
stream load parquet: 32 seconds loaded 861443392 Bytes, about 25 MB/s
insert into select: 29.7 seconds inserted 10000000 Rows, about 336K ops/s
storage size: 17163238537 Bytes

@xiaokang xiaokang merged commit 79f6d36 into apache:branch-2.0 Jan 4, 2024
25 of 27 checks passed
@BiteTheDDDDt BiteTheDDDDt deleted the cp_0103 branch January 20, 2025 06:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/planner Issues or PRs related to the query planner kind/test
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants