Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: remove uses of arrow_schema and use reexport in arrow instead #14597

Merged

Conversation

Chen-Yuan-Lai
Copy link
Contributor

Which issue does this PR close?

Rationale for this change

What changes are included in this PR?

As #14528 (comment) says, arrow_schema should be removed and be replaced with reexport in arrow as much as possible.

Are these changes tested?

Are there any user-facing changes?

@github-actions github-actions bot added sql SQL Planner physical-expr Physical Expressions optimizer Optimizer rules core Core DataFusion crate common Related to common crate proto Related to proto crate functions labels Feb 11, 2025
@Chen-Yuan-Lai Chen-Yuan-Lai force-pushed the use_reexport_in_arrow_instead_of_arrow_schema branch from be33471 to c7248fa Compare February 11, 2025 05:24
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the proto Related to proto crate label Feb 11, 2025
@Chen-Yuan-Lai
Copy link
Contributor Author

Due to some uses of record_batch! macro, I kept arrow-schema dependency in physical-plan and datafusion-examples

Copy link
Contributor

@alamb alamb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @Chen-Yuan-Lai -- this is a great PR ❤️

@alamb alamb merged commit 5cfc653 into apache:main Feb 11, 2025
26 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
common Related to common crate core Core DataFusion crate functions optimizer Optimizer rules physical-expr Physical Expressions sql SQL Planner
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Use NullBufferBuilder instead of BooleanBufferBuilder for creating Null masks
2 participants