test: coverage report

[RobPasMue]

Testing coverage reporting...

[RobPasMue]

@FedericoNegri - no clue how you are getting above 90% code coverage but pytest still says 53... we can maybe jump in a call next week

[RobPasMue]

@klmcadams for visibility

[klmcadams]

@RobPasMue My initial thought is maybe it has something to do with tox? Whenever I ran the command below locally, it showed 90 or 92% coverage. Could we replace tox with the command below in the workflow?

coverage run -m pytest -ra -s --durations=0 -p pytest_cov --cov=ansys.hps --cov-report html:.cov/html --cov-report xml:.cov/xml --cov-report term --junitxml test_results-py310-coverage.xml -vv --cov-append

[RobPasMue]

@RobPasMue My initial thought is maybe it has something to do with tox? Whenever I ran the command below locally, it showed 90 or 92% coverage. Could we replace tox with the command below in the workflow?

coverage run -m pytest -ra -s --durations=0 -p pytest_cov --cov=ansys.hps --cov-report html:.cov/html --cov-report xml:.cov/xml --cov-report term --junitxml test_results-py310-coverage.xml -vv --cov-append

Sure - as long as @FedericoNegri is fine switching the way we do testing - I'd propose running it with a normal matrix and using pytest directly. Open a new PR or modify this one directly if you want to give it a try

[klmcadams]

@RobPasMue I tried with pytest & coverage -m pytest, and it still isn't showing the 90% coverage, so I'm at a loss for the moment

[RobPasMue]

Thanks @klmcadams

@FedericoNegri It seems weird to me that after so many attempts we are always reporting 53%. Could we meet to see that 90% you report locally?

[FedericoNegri]

@RobPasMue @klmcadams I think here you're still mixing running with coverage and the pytest-cov plugin.

[RobPasMue]

Feel free to edit the PR @FedericoNegri - pytest-cov should just be a wrapper on top of coverage

[RobPasMue]

Otherwise, @klmcadams get in sync with @FedericoNegri and give it a try to the way he is running it locally to report 92%. It's the first time I see this behaviour...

[klmcadams]

Resolved in #307