Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(Examples): Fixed bug in FaceId RISC-V example #806

Closed
wants to merge 0 commits into from

Conversation

vicloginov
Copy link
Contributor

Fixed bug of FaceId RISC-V example when it's executed on MAX78000 Feather board.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the MAX78000 Related to the MAX78000 (AI85) label Nov 22, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@Jake-Carter Jake-Carter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @vicloginov

One minor comment below - can we use TFT_ENABLE or ENABLE_TFT across both examples? I think it will help if we make this definition consistent

@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ endif
# Place build files specific to FTHR_RevA here.
ifeq "$(BOARD)" "FTHR_RevA"
# Only Enable if 2.4" TFT is connected to Feather
#PROJ_CFLAGS+=-DENABLE_TFT
#PROJ_CFLAGS+=-DTFT_ENABLE
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mismatch between TFT_ENABLE here

@@ -19,7 +20,7 @@ endif
# Place build files specific to FTHR_RevA here.
ifeq "$(BOARD)" "FTHR_RevA"
# Only Enable if 2.4" TFT is connected to Feather
# PROJ_CFLAGS+=-DENABLE_TFT
#PROJ_CFLAGS+=-DENABLE_TFT
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

and ENABLE_TFT here

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agree. I will rename it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
MAX78000 Related to the MAX78000 (AI85)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants