Str-727 Upgrade EL guest code to prove range of N blocks

[MdTeach]

Description

Upgrades the current EL guest code and prover manager to support proving the range of EL blocks. The current implementation is designed to prove the STF of a single EL block. This upgrade will generalize the process to handle N blocks.

Type of Change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature/Enhancement (non-breaking change which adds functionality or enhances an existing one)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• Documentation update
• Refactor
• New or updated tests
• Dependency Update

Notes to Reviewers

Checklist

• I have performed a self-review of my code.
• I have commented my code where necessary.
• I have updated the documentation if needed.
• My changes do not introduce new warnings.
• I have added tests that prove my changes are effective or that my feature works.
• New and existing tests pass with my changes.

Related Issues

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 65.95745% with 48 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 56.66%. Comparing base (5008f3d) to head (c7303fb).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
bin/prover-client/src/proving_ops/el_ops.rs	0.00%	18 Missing ⚠️
crates/proof-impl/evm-ee-stf/src/utils.rs	69.04%	13 Missing ⚠️
bin/prover-client/src/prover.rs	0.00%	7 Missing ⚠️
crates/reth/exex/src/prover_exex.rs	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️
bin/prover-client/src/proving_ops/cl_ops.rs	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
bin/prover-client/src/rpc_server.rs	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
crates/proof-impl/cl-stf/src/lib.rs	93.75%	1 Missing ⚠️
crates/proof-impl/evm-ee-stf/src/lib.rs	95.45%	1 Missing ⚠️

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #533      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   56.76%   56.66%   -0.11%     
==========================================
  Files         306      308       +2     
  Lines       31263    31316      +53     
==========================================
- Hits        17747    17745       -2     
- Misses      13516    13571      +55     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
crates/proof-impl/evm-ee-stf/src/db.rs	48.18% <100.00%> (ø)
crates/proof-impl/evm-ee-stf/src/primitives.rs	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
crates/proof-impl/evm-ee-stf/src/processor.rs	61.18% <100.00%> (ø)
crates/proof-impl/evm-ee-stf/src/prover.rs	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
crates/reth/db/src/rocksdb/db.rs	92.07% <100.00%> (+0.41%)	⬆️
crates/reth/rpc/src/lib.rs	0.00% <ø> (ø)
crates/rpc/prover-client-api/src/lib.rs	0.00% <ø> (ø)
crates/test-utils/src/evm_ee.rs	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
crates/zkvm/adapters/sp1/src/host.rs	0.00% <ø> (ø)
crates/proof-impl/cl-stf/src/lib.rs	93.67% <93.75%> (-2.21%)	⬇️
... and 7 more

... and 8 files with indirect coverage changes

[delbonis]

Overall looks good.

[prajwolrg]

Looks good overall!
While we are here let's change the names from EL -> EvmEe

[evgenyzdanovich]

Looks good!

[MdTeach]

Is it feasible to define the proof job in terms of the block IDs to avoid the possibility for the block indexes to ever get confused?

Yes, It can be done after #522 where proof_key will be used to reference proof job which will be based on block ID.
Created STR-755 to track this

[storopoli]

ACK c7303fb

Nice work!