-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 206
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
show_activity() functions overhaul #505
Open
OciXCrom
wants to merge
16
commits into
alliedmodders:master
Choose a base branch
from
OciXCrom:show_activity-overhaul
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
663cbef
Update lang.inc
OciXCrom 10defb9
Update lang.inc
OciXCrom ec4aa4b
Merge pull request #1 from alliedmodders/master
OciXCrom a167170
Merge pull request #2 from alliedmodders/master
OciXCrom 61b996e
Merge pull request #3 from alliedmodders/master
OciXCrom 1f57ed4
Update amxmisc.inc
OciXCrom 1156bc0
Update amxconst.inc
OciXCrom 6782da6
Update amxmisc.inc
OciXCrom f883fcc
Update amxconst.inc
OciXCrom c1cd996
Update amxmisc.inc
OciXCrom b2625ca
Update amxmisc.inc
OciXCrom 8382f19
Update amxconst.inc
OciXCrom b21df72
Changed static to new
OciXCrom d2c71a4
Added SetGlobalTransTarget to fix LANG_PLAYER
OciXCrom 61ffeee
Add ActivityTrim to prevent double whitespace in messages
OciXCrom 97fdfda
Remove extra whitespace automatically
OciXCrom File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
new
should be here.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm? It's already
new
.// Nvm, that's the outdated review.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@OciXCrom I mean inside for-loop block.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@WPMGPRoSToTeMa It's declared inside the for-loop body.
I think you're viewing the old version of the code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@OciXCrom I mean its declaration should be moved to its first assignment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You fool, never quote me! But yes, it doesn't matter much here as said KlIPPy.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rsKliPPy That's exactly what I did. I declared the variable before the ";" in the loop like I always do, so I don't see a problem. I've always been told that declaring them in the actual loop is bad.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@OciXCrom look the difference diffchecker/mergely/gist.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@OciXCrom have you looked into this assembly? Do you have any questions/thoughts?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@WPMGPRoSToTeMa I can't say that I understand much what that even means. Maybe you can explain? If it's not something extremely important, let's just keep it declared in the for() body for the sake of everyone knowing that that is the better way to do it.