Issue 79 - Managing secrets and dealing with headers

[baubakg]

Description

Related Issue

Resolves #79

Motivation and Context

We have discovered that it is not always safe to pass secrets in the json payload.

How Has This Been Tested?

• unit tests
• integration tests
• manual tests

Types of changes

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• [x ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

• [ x] I have signed the Adobe Open Source CLA.
• [x ] My code follows the code style of this project.
• [x ] My change requires a change to the documentation.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• [x ] I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
• [ x] I have added tests to cover my changes.
• [x ] All new and existing tests passed.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.06%. Comparing base (a06cb6f) to head (5dac654).

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main     #121      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     90.36%   91.06%   +0.70%     
- Complexity      239      262      +23     
============================================
  Files            24       25       +1     
  Lines           633      683      +50     
  Branches         57       57              
============================================
+ Hits            572      622      +50     
  Misses           47       47              
  Partials         14       14              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
13 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
100.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud