Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CS61B_Graph_Traversal_Element #15

Closed
wants to merge 23 commits into from
Closed

CS61B_Graph_Traversal_Element #15

wants to merge 23 commits into from

Conversation

dahluwalia
Copy link
Contributor

Packaged interactive graph element

Copy link
Contributor

@armandofox armandofox left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i don't understand where the is_sublist questions are coming from. what do they have to do with the graph traversal element?
names like New_1 and New_1_copy2 are profoundly uninformative. please name things according to what they actually are.
why are there questions BFS_Old_1 and BFS_Old_copy1 etc? remember, this is the repo that is going to be seen by the public. ie professors and students wanting to use the element to create course content. giving names like that to example questions or example assessments makes it impossible to tell what's what without looking into every file. put yourself in the position of someone who has never seen this element before and is trying to use this repo as a way of learning how to develop questions with it. what would you yourself want to see in that case?

please do a thorough cleaning to get rid of any files in the PR that are not directly reltaed to your work; to delete files that are obsolete or not intended to be used as current examples or documentation; and to name things with names that are much more descriptive.
let me know when i should look again, but what is here now is not acceptable for public presentation.

@dahluwalia
Copy link
Contributor Author

Updated naming of files and deleted irrelevant files.

@armandofox
Copy link
Contributor

armandofox commented Dec 19, 2023 via email

Copy link
Contributor

@armandofox armandofox left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please don't delete the global README.md file

Copy link
Contributor

@armandofox armandofox left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • please don't delete the global README.md file
  • .DS_Store files are spurious and created by Mac OS, they should never be versioned
  • why is the CS169A/original_questions directory under your project's directories?
  • why did all the other projects' directories/questions now get moved under yours?

this is a mess. i think you need to start from a clean PR and add your files one at a time and with caution. i am not willing to mess up the main repo.

@dahluwalia dahluwalia closed this by deleting the head repository Dec 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants