Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: codeql configuration #18

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 18, 2024
Merged

feat: codeql configuration #18

merged 4 commits into from
Nov 18, 2024

Conversation

XionWCFM
Copy link
Owner

@XionWCFM XionWCFM commented Nov 17, 2024

πŸ₯· 제λͺ©

κ΅¬ν˜„ν•œ λ‚΄μš©

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced automated CodeQL analysis for pull requests to enhance code quality and security.
    • Added a new configuration file to streamline the analysis process by focusing on relevant source code.
  • Documentation

    • Updated workflow documentation to reflect the new CodeQL analysis integration.

@XionWCFM XionWCFM self-assigned this Nov 17, 2024
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 17, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git β†—οΈŽ

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
xionwcfm-lib βœ… Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview πŸ’¬ Add feedback Nov 18, 2024 1:59am

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 17, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new CodeQL configuration file and a GitHub Actions workflow for automating CodeQL analysis on pull requests. The configuration file specifies which directories to include and exclude during the analysis, focusing on the packages and apps directories while ignoring test files and dependencies. The workflow automates the analysis process, triggered by pull request events, and includes steps for checking out the repository, initializing CodeQL, building the project, and performing the analysis.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/codeql.yml New configuration file added for CodeQL analysis, specifying included and ignored paths.
.github/workflows/codeql.yml New GitHub Actions workflow added to automate CodeQL analysis on pull requests, including multiple job steps.

Poem

In the burrow deep, where code does play,
A new path for analysis has found its way.
With CodeQL's help, our code shines bright,
Ignoring the tests, it takes to flight!
Hopping through branches, we check with glee,
For cleaner code is the goal, you see! πŸ‡βœ¨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❀️ Share
πŸͺ§ Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the feat label Nov 17, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 17, 2024

Coverage Report

Status Category Percentage Covered / Total
πŸ”΅ Lines 1.44% 122 / 8430
πŸ”΅ Statements 1.44% 122 / 8430
πŸ”΅ Functions 14.58% 35 / 240
πŸ”΅ Branches 19.6% 49 / 250
File CoverageNo changed files found.
Generated in workflow #12 for commit 9c2635f by the Vitest Coverage Report Action

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests βœ…

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/codeql.yml (1)

3-3: Fix YAML formatting issues.

Please address the following formatting issues:

  1. Remove trailing spaces on line 3
  2. Add a newline character at the end of the file
-on: 
+on:
 
   # ... rest of the file ...
-          category: '/language:${{matrix.language}}'
+          category: '/language:${{matrix.language}}'
+

Also applies to: 36-36

🧰 Tools
πŸͺ› yamllint

[error] 3-3: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

πŸ“œ Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c4229fd and 736ee75.

πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/codeql.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/codeql.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
πŸͺ› yamllint
.github/codeql.yml

[error] 10-10: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

.github/workflows/codeql.yml

[error] 3-3: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 36-36: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

πŸ”‡ Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/codeql.yml (3)

10-13: LGTM! Permissions follow security best practices.

The permissions are correctly configured following the principle of least privilege, with only the necessary permissions granted.


15-18: Verify if other languages need to be included in the analysis.

Currently, only TypeScript is configured for analysis. Let's verify if there are other languages in the repository that should be included.

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other programming languages in the repository

# List all file extensions excluding common non-code files
echo "File extensions in the repository:"
find . -type f -name "*.*" | grep -v "^\./\.git/" | sed 's/.*\.//' | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr

# Check for package files indicating different languages
echo -e "\nPackage files found:"
find . -maxdepth 2 -type f -name "package.json" -o -name "requirements.txt" -o -name "go.mod" -o -name "Gemfile" -o -name "composer.json"

28-28: ⚠️ Potential issue

Verify the CodeQL configuration file.

The workflow references ./.github/codeql.yml, but this file is not present in the PR. Please ensure that:

  1. The configuration file is included in the PR
  2. The path is correct
  3. The file contains the necessary path inclusions/exclusions
βœ… Verification successful

CodeQL configuration file is present and properly configured

The CodeQL configuration file .github/codeql.yml exists and contains appropriate configuration:

  • Includes relevant source paths (src and app)
  • Excludes test and story files
  • Has valid YAML syntax
  • Is correctly referenced from the workflow file
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for the existence and content of the CodeQL config file

echo "Checking for CodeQL config file:"
if [ -f ".github/codeql.yml" ]; then
    cat ".github/codeql.yml"
else
    echo "CodeQL config file not found!"
fi

Length of output: 369


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the CodeQL config file with proper error handling
echo "Checking for CodeQL config file existence and content:"
if [ -f ".github/codeql.yml" ]; then
    echo "File exists. Content:"
    cat ".github/codeql.yml" 2>&1
else 
    echo "File not found at .github/codeql.yml"
fi

# Let's also check if there might be a typo in the filename or location
echo -e "\nSearching for similar config files:"
fd -g "*codeql*.yml" .github/

Length of output: 538

.github/workflows/codeql.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/codeql.yml (3)

3-4: Fix trailing whitespace.

Remove the trailing space after on:.

-on: 
+on:
🧰 Tools
πŸͺ› yamllint

[error] 3-3: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


22-22: Consider using more specific action versions.

Using major versions (@v2, @v3) allows for automatic updates but may introduce unexpected changes. Consider using specific versions for better reproducibility.

-        uses: actions/checkout@v3
+        uses: actions/[email protected]
-        uses: github/codeql-action/init@v2
+        uses: github/codeql-action/[email protected]
-        uses: github/codeql-action/autobuild@v2
+        uses: github/codeql-action/[email protected]
-        uses: github/codeql-action/analyze@v2
+        uses: github/codeql-action/[email protected]

Also applies to: 25-25, 31-31, 34-34


36-36: Add newline at end of file.

Add a newline character at the end of the file to follow POSIX standards.

         with:
           category: '/language:${{matrix.language}}'
+
🧰 Tools
πŸͺ› yamllint

[error] 36-36: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

πŸ“œ Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 736ee75 and 443fa69.

πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/codeql.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
πŸͺ› yamllint
.github/workflows/codeql.yml

[error] 3-3: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 36-36: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

πŸ”‡ Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/codeql.yml (2)

10-13: LGTM! Well-configured permissions following security best practices.

The permissions follow the principle of least privilege, granting only the necessary access levels for each scope.


28-28: Verify the CodeQL configuration file.

The workflow references ./.github/codeql.yml, but this file isn't included in the PR.

βœ… Verification successful

CodeQL configuration file exists and appears to be properly configured

The referenced .github/codeql.yml file exists and contains valid configuration:

  • Includes relevant source paths (src, app)
  • Properly excludes test and story files
  • Has appropriate YAML structure
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the referenced CodeQL config file exists
if [ -f "./.github/codeql.yml" ]; then
    echo "CodeQL config file exists"
    cat "./.github/codeql.yml"
else
    echo "Missing CodeQL config file!"
fi

Length of output: 265

.github/workflows/codeql.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

@XionWCFM XionWCFM merged commit d21489c into main Nov 18, 2024
10 of 11 checks passed
@XionWCFM XionWCFM deleted the codeql branch November 18, 2024 02:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants