You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
How can paleo collections better share taxonomic data? Paleo taxonomy is complicated by taxa where the higher classification is uncertain and by identifications which can only be made to a rank e.g. subfamily, which does not have a DwC equivalent. These complications lead to situations where paleo taxonomic data published on aggregators (iDigBio, GBIF) gets "cleaned" with results that are unpredictable and often inhibit discoverability. This webinar will look at how these complications are handled in the ADBC standard, as well as brainstorm potential solutions, including the possibility of advocating for additional classification fields in the DwC standard.
How can paleo collections better share taxonomic data? Paleo taxonomy is complicated by taxa where the higher classification is uncertain and by identifications which can only be made to a rank e.g. subfamily, which does not have a DwC equivalent. These complications lead to situations where paleo taxonomic data published on aggregators (iDigBio, GBIF) gets "cleaned" with results that are unpredictable and often inhibit discoverability. This webinar will look at how these complications are handled in the ADBC standard, as well as brainstorm potential solutions, including the possibility of advocating for additional classification fields in the DwC standard.
Relevant to...
Checklist to keep things moving for new webinars. To do items include:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: