You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
taxonRank is a recommended term for paleontological specimens. It is used to check/verify the given taxonomy for an occurrence record against taxonomic backbones by aggregators. The given taxonRank can inform how to clean taxonomy upon ingest.
In GBIF only about 35% of fossilSpecimen records have a value in taxonRank. Additionally, the values are not all valid or useful within the context of DwC. Often the rank of a given taxonomy does not have an equivalent term in DwC (e.g. Clade, Infraorder, subclass).
It would be useful to better define the best practice for this term in a paleontological context and to further contextualize the importance of this term with more detailed information about the data quality checks and the taxonomy cleanup steps that are based on it for the major aggregators.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
hollyel
added
the
Taxon
used to denote issues related to terms in the DwC taxon class
label
Nov 1, 2018
From Matt during 11/28/2018 mtg: dwc:taxonRank tells the iDigBio matching algorithm which dwc taxon level field to weight the heaviest. So if we give iDigBio a taxonRank value that is not also a dwc field (e.g. subclass) then the matching is affected negatively.
dwc:taxonRank is very useful because it says not to try to get more specific with the matching than this rank (confirmation that iDigBio follows this logic; it is one of the first checks that takes place in the cleaning algorithm )
iDigBio looks for dwc:verbatimTaxonRank first, then dwc:taxonRank
but you get strange matches when you put in a value for dwc:taxonRank that doesn't correspond to a DwC taxonomic classification field
if taxonRank is not provided then the iDigBio workflow will try to identify what the taxonRank is based on other terms provided
So what to do with specimens identified to a taxon rank that does not correspond to a DwC field? Should this be a broader community discussion? Suggesting a Darwin Core Hour webinar, see: VertNet/dwc-qa-manage#42
taxonRank is a recommended term for paleontological specimens. It is used to check/verify the given taxonomy for an occurrence record against taxonomic backbones by aggregators. The given taxonRank can inform how to clean taxonomy upon ingest.
In GBIF only about 35% of fossilSpecimen records have a value in taxonRank. Additionally, the values are not all valid or useful within the context of DwC. Often the rank of a given taxonomy does not have an equivalent term in DwC (e.g. Clade, Infraorder, subclass).
It would be useful to better define the best practice for this term in a paleontological context and to further contextualize the importance of this term with more detailed information about the data quality checks and the taxonomy cleanup steps that are based on it for the major aggregators.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: