Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add provenance writing for app_vertex #885

Open
wants to merge 55 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

andrewgait
Copy link
Contributor

@andrewgait andrewgait commented Oct 27, 2021

@andrewgait andrewgait added the enhancement This adds a new feature label Oct 27, 2021
@andrewgait andrewgait added this to the 7.0.0 milestone Oct 27, 2021

def test_app_vertex(self):
with ProvenanceWriter() as db:
db.insert_app_vertex("pop", "type", "description", 0.5)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The type tested here does not match the CREATE TABLE.

While it works it is not the cleanest

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oops - good spot, edited.

@Christian-B
Copy link
Member

Approved to merge when you want into whichever branch you feel best

@Christian-B
Copy link
Member

Christian-B commented May 24, 2022

Should the field and param "population" not be "label".

At the FEC level there are no Populations (minor)

You are actually saving the AbstractPopulationVertex.label. (Yes I know that is typically also the population label)

Would allow the table/ method also to be used for none Population Vertices

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Sep 12, 2023

Coverage Status

coverage: 42.3% (+0.007%) from 42.293% when pulling f35411a on weight_scale into a209c35 on master.

@dkfellows dkfellows removed this from the 7.0.0 milestone Sep 26, 2023
@dkfellows dkfellows added this to the 7.1.0 milestone Sep 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants