Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Submitting the merged files again #177

Merged
merged 37 commits into from
Oct 12, 2024
Merged

Submitting the merged files again #177

merged 37 commits into from
Oct 12, 2024

Conversation

mehdigithub1
Copy link
Contributor

Submitting the merged files again but with two input laser ports on both of the GCs.

mehdigithub1 and others added 23 commits October 7, 2024 18:26
…s each (6 total). It is needed to find the error bar according to the three times of the same devices.
Each files of EBeam_Mehdi_paperclips_3 and EBeam_Mehdi_paperclips_4 has two more copies (..._2nd and ..._3rd). The input port names for the copied files are different to be able to differentiate the results. However, the measurements should be supposedly very similar. They only will be used to calculate the error bars.
4 More files to submit (in addition to the previous 6 files), 2 different files and only one copy of each one.
These two files are corrected. Errors:  Disconnected ports.
Thanks for checking that. I actually forgot to delete the cell completely.
Copy link

Thank you for your pull request! 👋

Copy link

Thank you for your pull request! 👋

There are errors on RR5 and RR6. The reason is because I wanted two ring resonators (RR5 and RR6) include three and two rings in series, respectively. But closer than simply possible by connecting the defined ports. So, I was not sure how I could reduce the straight waveguide of each half-ring directional coupler to make the rings in series closer. This is the source of error. Is it still possible to fabricate them?
Copy link

Thank you for your pull request! 👋

Copy link

Thank you for your pull request! 👋

Copy link

Thank you for your pull request! 👋

Copy link

Thank you for your pull request! 👋

Copy link

Thank you for your pull request! 👋

Copy link

Thank you for your pull request! 👋

Copy link

Thank you for your pull request! 👋

Copy link

Thank you for your pull request! 👋

Copy link

Thank you for your pull request! 👋

Copy link

Thank you for your pull request! 👋

1 similar comment
Copy link

Thank you for your pull request! 👋

Copy link

Thank you for your pull request! 👋

@omidesml
Copy link
Contributor

Would you please sync your fork? I see some conflicts.
Also, there are changes requested to the yaml files
image

Copy link

Thank you for your pull request! 👋

@mehdigithub1
Copy link
Contributor Author

I just synced the

@omidesml omidesml merged commit 0c30ae6 into SiEPIC:main Oct 12, 2024
2 of 3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants