-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 99
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Submitting the merged files again #177
Conversation
…s each (6 total). It is needed to find the error bar according to the three times of the same devices.
…clips_2_1st_repeat.gds
…clips_2_2nd_repeat.gds
…ips_2_1st_repeat.gds
…ips_1_1st_repeat.gds
…ips_1_2nd_repeat.gds
Each files of EBeam_Mehdi_paperclips_3 and EBeam_Mehdi_paperclips_4 has two more copies (..._2nd and ..._3rd). The input port names for the copied files are different to be able to differentiate the results. However, the measurements should be supposedly very similar. They only will be used to calculate the error bars.
4 More files to submit (in addition to the previous 6 files), 2 different files and only one copy of each one.
These two files are corrected. Errors: Disconnected ports.
Thanks for checking that. I actually forgot to delete the cell completely.
Thank you for your pull request! 👋 |
Thank you for your pull request! 👋 |
There are errors on RR5 and RR6. The reason is because I wanted two ring resonators (RR5 and RR6) include three and two rings in series, respectively. But closer than simply possible by connecting the defined ports. So, I was not sure how I could reduce the straight waveguide of each half-ring directional coupler to make the rings in series closer. This is the source of error. Is it still possible to fabricate them?
Thank you for your pull request! 👋 |
Thank you for your pull request! 👋 |
Thank you for your pull request! 👋 |
Thank you for your pull request! 👋 |
Thank you for your pull request! 👋 |
Thank you for your pull request! 👋 |
Thank you for your pull request! 👋 |
Thank you for your pull request! 👋 |
Thank you for your pull request! 👋 |
Thank you for your pull request! 👋 |
1 similar comment
Thank you for your pull request! 👋 |
Thank you for your pull request! 👋 |
Thank you for your pull request! 👋 |
I just synced the |
Submitting the merged files again but with two input laser ports on both of the GCs.