Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add annotations for opentelemetry-sdk #189

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

JamieMagee
Copy link

Type of Change

  • Add RBI for a new gem
  • Modify RBI for an existing gem
  • Other:

Changes

# typed: true

module OpenTelemetry
sig { returns(OpenTelemetry::Trace::TracerProvider) }
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can see some internal usages of the SDK, I'm not familiar with OpenTelemetry but isn't it a better experience to return implementation types? For example OpenTelemetry::SDK::Trace::TracerProvider?

Example call site: OpenTelemetry.tracer_provider.shutdown

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, I can do that. Would you also like me to update all the references below to be OpenTelemetry::SDK:: instead of OpenTelemetry::?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think so. Looks like API and SDK are 2 separate gems. This annotation is for the SDK given the name so I think it's fine to type things for the SDK specifically.

Comment on lines +32 to +33
sig { params(end_timestamp: Integer).void }
def finish(end_timestamp: nil); end
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If the default value is nil, I think the end_timestamp should be T.nilable(Integer), no?

@Morriar Morriar added the rbi Change related to RBI annotations label Mar 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rbi Change related to RBI annotations
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants