Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[6.16] negative assertions for rex effective user tests #17420

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

pondrejk
Copy link
Contributor

Problem Statement

closes #17414

Solution

Related Issues

@pondrejk pondrejk added No-CherryPick PR doesnt need CherryPick to previous branches 6.16.z Introduced in or relating directly to Satellite 6.16 labels Jan 23, 2025
@pondrejk pondrejk self-assigned this Jan 23, 2025
@pondrejk pondrejk requested a review from a team as a code owner January 23, 2025 13:46
@pondrejk
Copy link
Contributor Author

trigger: test-robottelo
pytest: tests/foreman/cli/test_remoteexecution.py -k test_positive_run_job_effective_user[rhel9-ipv4]

@Satellite-QE
Copy link
Collaborator

PRT Result

Build Number: 9968
Build Status: SUCCESS
PRT Comment: pytest tests/foreman/cli/test_remoteexecution.py -k test_positive_run_job_effective_user[rhel9-ipv4] --external-logging
Test Result : ========== 1 passed, 60 deselected, 73 warnings in 1123.55s (0:18:43) ==========

@Satellite-QE Satellite-QE added the PRT-Passed Indicates that latest PRT run is passed for the PR label Jan 23, 2025
@pondrejk pondrejk changed the title negative assertions for rex effective user tests [6.16] negative assertions for rex effective user tests Jan 23, 2025
@pondrejk pondrejk merged commit a3a308a into SatelliteQE:6.16.z Jan 23, 2025
15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
6.16.z Introduced in or relating directly to Satellite 6.16 No-CherryPick PR doesnt need CherryPick to previous branches PRT-Passed Indicates that latest PRT run is passed for the PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants