Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[res] Introduce TransposeConv_002 #12440

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2024
Merged

[res] Introduce TransposeConv_002 #12440

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2024

Conversation

mhs4670go
Copy link
Contributor

This commit introduces TransposeConv_002 recipe for checking if non-constant out_shape can be inferred by the shape inference.

Related: #12429 (comment)
Draft: #12434
ONE-DCO-1.0-Signed-off-by: seongwoo [email protected]

This commit introduces TransposeConv_002 recipe for checking if non-constant out_shape can be inferred by the shape inference.

ONE-DCO-1.0-Signed-off-by: seongwoo <[email protected]>
@mhs4670go mhs4670go added the PR/ready for review It is ready to review. Please review it. label Jan 10, 2024
@mhs4670go mhs4670go requested a review from seanshpark January 10, 2024 09:40
@mhs4670go
Copy link
Contributor Author

@miusic Please refer to this recipe where part of the pattern in #12046 become support with this PR.

Copy link
Contributor

@seanshpark seanshpark left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@Seunghui98 Seunghui98 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM :)

@seanshpark seanshpark merged commit 9b2a65e into Samsung:master Jan 10, 2024
3 checks passed
@mhs4670go mhs4670go deleted the tr3 branch January 24, 2024 02:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
PR/ready for review It is ready to review. Please review it.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants