Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow setDT(get(...)) to work as previously #6726

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jan 17, 2025
Merged

Conversation

MichaelChirico
Copy link
Member

Closes #6725

Eh, pretty hacky, I'm still not sure we've made a good solution of the breaking changes induced by #6551.

Anyway I think the change is good: running setDT(env$x) should definitely behave the same as setDT(get('x', env)).

@MichaelChirico MichaelChirico requested a review from tdhock January 16, 2025 21:56
R/data.table.R Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 16, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.62%. Comparing base (e0abdfc) to head (3fbf5ab).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #6726   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.62%   98.62%           
=======================================
  Files          79       79           
  Lines       14625    14630    +5     
=======================================
+ Hits        14424    14429    +5     
  Misses        201      201           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@tdhock
Copy link
Member

tdhock commented Jan 17, 2025

lgtm

@MichaelChirico MichaelChirico merged commit d263924 into master Jan 17, 2025
10 of 11 checks passed
@MichaelChirico MichaelChirico deleted the setDT-get branch January 17, 2025 13:03
rffontenelle pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2025
* Allow setDT(get(...)) to work as previously

* Quirks of test.data.table...

* need to eval() in the right place

* imitate the approach in other branches more closely

* maybe we just needed enclos=?

* Comment for posterity

* Actually do the test
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

setDT() on a get()-returned object no longer works as intended
2 participants