Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

allow bbox in occ sens constructor #5169

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rijobro
Copy link
Contributor

@rijobro rijobro commented Sep 16, 2022

Description

If bounding box is always the same, it makes sense to give the user the option to set it in the constructor.

If bbox given in __call__ method use that. Else use bbox given in constructor. Else use None.

Types of changes

  • Non-breaking change (fix or new feature that would not break existing functionality).

@rijobro rijobro requested review from wyli, ericspod and Nic-Ma September 16, 2022 13:19
@@ -298,6 +306,7 @@ def __call__(self, x: torch.Tensor, b_box: Optional[Sequence] = None) -> Tuple[t
* The most probable class when the corresponding part of the image is occluded (``argmax(dim=-1)``).
Both images will be cropped if a bounding box used, but voxel sizes will always match the input.
"""
bbox = bbox if bbox is not None else self.bbox
Copy link
Contributor

@wyli wyli Sep 16, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the method is currently using b_box

Suggested change
bbox = bbox if bbox is not None else self.bbox
bbox = b_box if b_box is not None else self.bbox

@@ -182,6 +189,7 @@ def __init__(
self.stride = stride
self.per_channel = per_channel
self.verbose = verbose
self.bbox = bbox
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please make the doc-string and code in consistent: "bbox" vs "b_box".
I would suggest b_box as the existing arg is b_box.

Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants