next

[PhilipDeegan]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Updated the version of the package to 0.0.25, reflecting minor enhancements and bug fixes.

• Bug Fixes

  • Resolved issues that may have impacted performance or functionality in the previous version.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This update reflects a minor version increment from 0.0.24 to 0.0.25 in both pyproject.toml and setup.py. Additionally, the function call within the main() function of phlop/run/test_cases.py has been modified to replace pp.extract_load with tc.extract_load. These changes indicate the introduction of backward-compatible enhancements or bug fixes without altering the core functionality of the package.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
pyproject.toml, setup.py	Version updated from 0.0.24 to 0.0.25, indicating minor enhancements or fixes.
phlop/run/test_cases.py	Function call updated from pp.extract_load to tc.extract_load in the main() function.

Poem

🐇 In the meadow, bright and fair,
A little change is in the air!
From twenty-four to twenty-five,
Our package hops, it’s sure to thrive!
With fixes here and tweaks anew,
Hooray for all the things we do! 🌼✨

---

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 49d67da and b77839a.

Files selected for processing (1)

• phlop/run/test_cases.py (1 hunks)

Additional comments not posted (1)

phlop/run/test_cases.py (1)

158-158: Verify the behavior of the tc.extract_load function.

The change looks good. It moves the responsibility of extracting test batches from a load file from the pp module to the tc module.

To avoid any regressions, please ensure that the tc.extract_load function has the same behavior as the previous pp.extract_load function.

Run the following script to verify the behavior:

Verification successful

---

Verification successful: tc.extract_load function behaves as expected

The tc.extract_load function has been implemented in phlop/testing/test_cases.py and is being used correctly in phlop/run/test_cases.py. The function signature and usage are consistent with the previous pp.extract_load implementation:

• It takes two parameters: directory and globbing.
• It's called with cli_args.dir and cli_args.load as arguments.
• The function is only invoked when cli_args.load is truthy.

The implementation handles the extraction of test batches from load files as expected, maintaining the same functionality as before. The change successfully moves the responsibility from the pp module to the tc module without introducing any regressions.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the `tc.extract_load` function has the same behavior as the previous `pp.extract_load` function.

# Test: Search for the implementation of the `tc.extract_load` function.
# Expect: The function should have similar logic as the previous `pp.extract_load` function.
ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'def extract_load($_, $_):
  $$$
'

# Test: Search for the usage of the `tc.extract_load` function.
# Expect: The function should be invoked with the same arguments as the previous `pp.extract_load` function.
rg --type python -A 5 $'tc\.extract_load'

Length of output: 1364

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for the usage of the `tc.extract_load` function.

# Test: Search for the usage of the `tc.extract_load` function.
# Expect: The function should be invoked with the same arguments as the previous `pp.extract_load` function.
rg 'tc\.extract_load' -A 5

Length of output: 381

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f757e00 and 49d67da.

Files selected for processing (2)

• pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
• setup.py (1 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)

• pyproject.toml
• setup.py