perlguts.pod - mention SV_THINKFIRST* macros, move blocks around #22911
+90
−48
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Leont
reviewed
Jan 14, 2025
Leont
reviewed
Jan 14, 2025
This commit: * Adds some initial description of the SV_THINKFIRST* macros to perlguts * Places that new content, along with Read-only and Copy-on-write sections closer to the sections which describe how to modify string contents. This commit is far from perfect. Reworking the the "Working with SVs" part of perlguts, such that there is a more obviously dedicated section for discussing string handling, seems like it would be definite future improvement.
richardleach
force-pushed
the
hydahy/perlguts_thinkfirst
branch
from
25b6f64 to
28db151
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This commit:
This commit is far from perfect. Reworking the the "Working with SVs" part of perlguts, such that there is a more obviously dedicated section for discussing string handling, seems like it would be definite future improvement.