conf: Upgrade package image_cropper from 5.0.1 to 8.0.2 #2664
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@palisadoes has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 8 minutes and 50 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces changes to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
Other🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
pubspec.yaml (1)
Removing analyzer dependencies requires attention to custom lint configuration
The removal of these analyzer dependencies needs to be reconsidered because:
- The project uses custom lint rules through
talawa_lintpackage which depends onanalyzer_pluginandcustom_lint_builderanalysis_options.yamlshows active usage of custom lint configuration with rules fromtalawa_lint- While these dependencies are commented out in the main
pubspec.yaml, they are actively used intalawa_lint/pubspec.yamlRemoving these dependencies could break the project's static analysis capabilities and custom lint rules.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
15-19: Verify impact of removing analyzer dependenciesPlease confirm that removing these analyzer dependencies won't affect the project's static analysis capabilities.
Also applies to: 24-25
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if these packages are referenced elsewhere rg "_fe_analyzer|analyzer_plugin|custom_lint_builder" --type yamlLength of output: 443
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there are any analyzer configurations in the project fd -e yaml -e yml . -x cat {} \; | grep -A 5 "analyzer:" # Check for any custom lint configurations fd "analysis_options.yaml" -x cat {}Length of output: 2689
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
lib/services/image_service.dart(1 hunks)pubspec.yaml(1 hunks)test/service_tests/image_service_test.dart(0 hunks)test/service_tests/multi_media_pick_service_test.dart(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- test/service_tests/image_service_test.dart
- test/service_tests/multi_media_pick_service_test.dart
🔇 Additional comments (2)
lib/services/image_service.dart (1)
41-44: LGTM! Correctly moved aspectRatioPresets to platform-specific settings
The changes align with image_cropper 8.0.2's requirements by moving aspectRatioPresets into AndroidUiSettings and IOSUiSettings.
Let's verify if we're using all relevant new features from 8.0.2:
Also applies to: 48-51
✅ Verification successful
The image_cropper 8.0.2 integration is properly implemented
The verification shows that:
- The package is correctly upgraded to version 8.0.2 in pubspec.yaml
- The aspectRatioPresets are properly moved to platform-specific UI settings
- All required settings are implemented including:
- Android: toolbar customization, background colors, grid colors, and aspect ratio controls
- iOS: minimum aspect ratio and preset configurations
- The limited presets (square and original) appear to be an intentional design choice
- No new 8.0.2 features are missing that would benefit this implementation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any image_cropper usage examples in tests or documentation
rg -t dart "image_cropper.*8\.0\.2" || rg -t dart "CropImage.*settings"
Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the pubspec.yaml for image_cropper version and search for its usage
echo "=== Checking pubspec.yaml for image_cropper version ==="
rg "image_cropper:" -A 2
echo -e "\n=== Searching for CropImage and related settings usage ==="
rg -t dart "CropImage|AndroidUiSettings|IOSUiSettings" -A 5
echo -e "\n=== Looking for the complete ImageService class implementation ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'class ImageService {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 1954
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's look at the full ImageService implementation to understand the context better
echo "=== Checking ImageService implementation ==="
rg -t dart "class ImageService" -A 60
echo -e "\n=== Checking for any other image cropping related files ==="
fd -t f -e dart . | xargs rg "image_cropper|CropImage|ImageService" -l
Length of output: 4687
pubspec.yaml (1)
53-53: Verify breaking changes in image_cropper upgrade
The upgrade from 5.0.1 to 8.0.2 is significant. While the code changes look correct, let's verify the changelog for any other breaking changes we should address.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the code analysis, I can now generate the final response:
Breaking changes in image_cropper upgrade appear to be handled correctly
The code in lib/services/image_service.dart shows proper usage of the latest image_cropper API with CroppedFile return type and uiSettings parameter, which aligns with version 8.0.2. The implementation correctly handles the API changes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Fetch the package's changelog or release notes
gh api repos/hnvn/flutter_image_cropper/releases | jq -r '.[].body' | grep -A 5 "BREAKING CHANGE"
Length of output: 99
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for image_cropper usage in the codebase to understand the impact
rg "image_cropper" -l
# Also search for CropImage or ImageCropper class usage
rg "CropImage|ImageCropper" -A 3
Length of output: 73926
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for image_cropper usage in the code to understand the API usage
rg "cropImage|ImageCropper" -A 3 lib/services/image_service.dart
Length of output: 587
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #2664 +/- ##
====================================================
+ Coverage 95.98% 96.11% +0.13%
====================================================
Files 187 189 +2
Lines 9887 9994 +107
====================================================
+ Hits 9490 9606 +116
+ Misses 397 388 -9 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
Please fix the failing tests |
|
Fixed ✅ |
| @@ -41,10 +41,6 @@ void main() { | |||
| when( | |||
| mockImageCropper.cropImage( | |||
| sourcePath: "test", | |||
| aspectRatioPresets: [ | |||
| CropAspectRatioPreset.square, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- You have removed testing features.
- We need to codebase to be stable and this defeats the purpose
- Please make the tests valid
| @@ -65,10 +61,6 @@ void main() { | |||
| when( | |||
| mockImageCropper.cropImage( | |||
| sourcePath: "test", | |||
| aspectRatioPresets: [ | |||
| CropAspectRatioPreset.square, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- You have removed testing features.
- We need to codebase to be stable and this defeats the purpose
- Please make the tests valid
|
Please make the appropriate adjustments so that all the tests pass and that all the tests truly test all possibilities in the code base |
palisadoes
added
the
ignore-sensitive-files-pr
|
@xkaper001 Are you still working on it ? |
|
Closing inactivity |
Fixes #2554
conf
Issue Number:
Fixes #2554
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes
Summary
Upgraded the package
image_cropperfrom5.0.1to8.0.2, changing all related functions, methods, classes and tests.Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores
image_cropperdependency version in the project configuration.