Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Figma: Refactor CSS files in src/components/AgendaCategory #3472

Conversation

Anushkaguptaaaa
Copy link

@Anushkaguptaaaa Anushkaguptaaaa commented Jan 28, 2025

What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Refactoring

Issue Number:
#3316

Snapshots/Videos:
image

Summary
Aim is to consolidate style sheet in agenda category into app.module style sheet

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No

Checklist

CodeRabbit AI Review

  • I have reviewed and addressed all critical issues flagged by CodeRabbit AI
  • I have implemented or provided justification for each non-critical suggestion
  • I have documented my reasoning in the PR comments where CodeRabbit AI suggestions were not implemented

Test Coverage

  • I have written tests for all new changes/features
  • I have verified that test coverage meets or exceeds 95%
  • I have run the test suite locally and all tests pass
    Have you read the contributing guide?
    Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style
    • Relocated and updated CSS styles for the Agenda Category component.
    • Moved styling from component-specific module to a centralized app-level stylesheet.
    • Introduced new styles for the agenda category modal, including positioning and title styling, to enhance visual structure and usability.
    • Updated button dimensions and added hover/focus effects for agenda category options to improve user interaction.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 28, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request involves refactoring CSS styles for the AgendaCategory component. The changes include removing the AgendaCategoryContainer.module.css file and updating the import statement in AgendaCategoryContainer.tsx to use styles from the global app.module.css. New CSS classes were added to app.module.css to maintain the existing styling for the agenda category modal and its elements, consolidating the styles into a single, centralized CSS file.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/components/AgendaCategory/AgendaCategoryContainer.module.css Deleted CSS module file
src/components/AgendaCategory/AgendaCategoryContainer.tsx Updated CSS import from local module to global app.module.css
src/style/app.module.css Added new CSS classes for AgendaCategory modal styling

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • palisadoes

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's CSS Rhyme 🎨
In the land of styles so bright,
We've merged our classes, oh so tight!
No more modules scattered wide,
One CSS file, with rabbit pride!
Simplicity hops, design takes flight! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c2c9bc4 and 4d7530f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/style/app.module.css (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Test Application
  • GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/style/app.module.css (2)

9147-9186: LGTM! Well-structured CSS implementation.

The CSS implementation for the AgendaCategory component follows best practices:

  • Proper modal positioning with responsive design
  • Semantic variable usage for colors
  • Accessible focus states and hover interactions
  • Consistent use of rem units

219-219: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use a semantic variable name that describes the function.

The variable name --grey-bg-color-agenda-category describes the color rather than its function. This makes it harder to maintain themes and add dark mode support.

Apply this diff to use a semantic name:

--- --grey-bg-color-agenda-category: #4b5563;
+++ --agenda-category-title-color: #4b5563;

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

@Anushkaguptaaaa Anushkaguptaaaa changed the title Contributors/anushka gupta/issue3316 Figma: Refactor CSS files in src/components/AgendaCategory #3316 Jan 28, 2025
@Anushkaguptaaaa Anushkaguptaaaa changed the title Figma: Refactor CSS files in src/components/AgendaCategory #3316 Figma: Refactor CSS files in src/components/AgendaCategory Jan 28, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)

9129-9131: Remove unnecessary empty lines.

These empty lines should be removed to maintain clean code style.

-
-
-
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[warning] Code style issues found. Run Prettier with --write to fix formatting issues.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a7f3771 and f4dee7c.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/components/AgendaCategory/AgendaCategoryContainer.module.css (0 hunks)
  • src/components/AgendaCategory/AgendaCategoryContainer.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/style/app.module.css (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/components/AgendaCategory/AgendaCategoryContainer.module.css
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • src/components/AgendaCategory/AgendaCategoryContainer.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow
src/style/app.module.css

[warning] Code style issues found. Run Prettier with --write to fix formatting issues.

src/style/app.module.css Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Cioppolo14
Copy link
Contributor

@Anushkaguptaaaa Please fix the failed tests and make sure coderabbit approves the PR

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/style/app.module.css (2)

9132-9136: Improve modal positioning for better responsiveness.

The fixed margin values may cause layout issues on smaller screens.

.createModalAgendaCategory {
-  margin-top: 20vh;
-  margin-left: 13vw;
+  position: fixed;
+  top: 50%;
+  left: 50%;
+  transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
  max-width: 80vw;
+  width: 100%;
+  
+  @media (max-width: 768px) {
+    max-width: 95vw;
+  }
}

9148-9151: Add interactive states and use relative units.

The button could benefit from hover/focus states and relative units for better accessibility.

-.agendaCategoryOptionsButton {
+.agenda-category-options-button {
-  width: 24px;
-  height: 24px;
+  width: 1.5rem;
+  height: 1.5rem;
+  cursor: pointer;
+  transition: transform 0.2s ease;
+
+  &:hover {
+    transform: scale(1.1);
+  }
+
+  &:focus-visible {
+    outline: 2px solid var(--light-blue);
+    outline-offset: 2px;
+  }
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f4dee7c and 72ee71b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/style/app.module.css (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Test Application
  • GitHub Check: Check Python Code Style
  • GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)

9138-9146: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use consistent naming convention and CSS variables.

The class uses camelCase which is inconsistent with CSS conventions. Also, hardcoded values should be replaced with CSS variables.

-.titlemodalAgendaCategory {
+.title-modal-agenda-category {
-  color: var(--bs-gray-600);
+  color: var(--grey-bg-color-dark);
   font-weight: 600;
   font-size: 20px;
   margin-bottom: 20px;
   padding-bottom: 5px;
-  border-bottom: 3px solid var(--bs-primary);
+  border-bottom: 3px solid var(--light-blue);
   width: 65%;
+  
+  @media (max-width: 768px) {
+    width: 100%;
+  }
}

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 28, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.82%. Comparing base (73cf8cd) to head (4d7530f).
Report is 12 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #3472       +/-   ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage              1.90%   88.82%   +86.92%     
=====================================================
  Files                   316      338       +22     
  Lines                  8249     8626      +377     
  Branches               1880     1922       +42     
=====================================================
+ Hits                    157     7662     +7505     
+ Misses                 8083      634     -7449     
- Partials                  9      330      +321     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)

9132-9142: Add responsive styles for better mobile support.

The modal's positioning and width could be improved for better mobile experience.

.createModalAgendaCategory {
  position: fixed;
  top: 50%;
  left: 50%;
  transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
  max-width: 80vw;

  @media (max-width: 768px) {
    max-width: 95vw;
+   margin: 0 auto;
+   padding: 1rem;
  }
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0b7cebf and 42ebdc1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/style/app.module.css (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Test Application
  • GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/style/app.module.css (2)

9154-9168: LGTM! Well-structured button styles.

The button styles follow best practices with:

  • Consistent naming using kebab-case
  • Proper use of rem units
  • Good accessibility with focus states
  • Smooth transitions

9144-9152: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use consistent naming convention and CSS variables.

The class name uses camelCase while others use kebab-case. Also, hardcoded color values should use CSS variables.

-.titlemodalAgendaCategory {
+.title-modal-agenda-category {
-  color: var(--bs-gray-600);
+  color: var(--grey-bg-color-dark);
   font-weight: 600;
   font-size: 20px;
   margin-bottom: 20px;
   padding-bottom: 5px;
-  border-bottom: 3px solid var(--bs-primary);
+  border-bottom: 3px solid var(--light-blue);
   width: 65%;
}

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Jan 28, 2025
@Anushkaguptaaaa
Copy link
Author

@coderabbitai full review

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 28, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Full review triggered.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/style/app.module.css (2)

9132-9142: Use consistent kebab-case naming convention for CSS classes.

The class name should follow kebab-case naming convention for consistency with other CSS classes.

-.createModalAgendaCategory {
+.create-modal-agenda-category {
   position: fixed;
   top: 50%;
   left: 50%;
   transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
   max-width: 80vw;

   @media (max-width: 768px) {
     max-width: 95vw;
   }
 }

9144-9152: Improve title modal class implementation.

The class needs improvements for better maintainability and responsiveness:

  1. Use kebab-case naming convention
  2. Make width more responsive
  3. Use CSS variables for consistent spacing
-.titlemodalAgendaCategory {
+.title-modal-agenda-category {
   color: var(--bs-gray-600);
   font-weight: 600;
   font-size: 20px;
-  margin-bottom: 20px;
-  padding-bottom: 5px;
+  margin-bottom: var(--spacing-lg, 20px);
+  padding-bottom: var(--spacing-sm, 5px);
   border-bottom: 3px solid var(--bs-primary);
-  width: 65%;
+  width: clamp(65%, 80%, 95%);
+
+  @media (max-width: 768px) {
+    width: 100%;
+  }
 }
src/components/AgendaCategory/AgendaCategoryContainer.tsx (1)

Line range hint 213-224: Consider adding visual regression tests.

Since this PR involves CSS refactoring, it's recommended to add visual regression tests to ensure the UI appearance remains unchanged after moving styles to app.module.css.

You could use tools like:

  • Percy
  • Chromatic
  • Cypress Visual Testing
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a7f3771 and 42ebdc1.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/components/AgendaCategory/AgendaCategoryContainer.module.css (0 hunks)
  • src/components/AgendaCategory/AgendaCategoryContainer.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/style/app.module.css (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/components/AgendaCategory/AgendaCategoryContainer.module.css
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/style/app.module.css (1)

9154-9168: LGTM! Well-implemented button styles with accessibility considerations.

The implementation includes:

  • Proper use of rem units for dimensions
  • Smooth hover transition effect
  • Focus-visible outline for accessibility
  • Good use of CSS variables
src/components/AgendaCategory/AgendaCategoryContainer.tsx (2)

13-13: LGTM: Import path updated correctly for style consolidation.

The change aligns with the PR objective of consolidating styles into app.module.css.


Line range hint 213-213: Verify style class naming convention.

There appears to be an inconsistency between the class name used in the code (agendaCategoryOptionsButton) and the one mentioned in the summary (agenda-category-options-button). Please ensure the class name in app.module.css matches the one used in the component.

Also applies to: 224-224

@Anushkaguptaaaa
Copy link
Author

@Anushkaguptaaaa Please fix the failed tests and make sure coderabbit approves the PR

Hello @Cioppolo14, I have fixed the code rabbit review comment, and resolved it again.
Althugh codeRabbit has approved it but still, one of the test against it is still failing i tried to re trigger the pipeline too, can you please help?

src/style/app.module.css Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/style/app.module.css Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 42ebdc1 and 8456338.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/style/app.module.css (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)

9130-9169: LGTM! Well-structured CSS for AgendaCategory component.

The CSS implementation follows best practices:

  • Proper use of CSS variables for colors
  • Responsive design with media queries
  • Accessible focus states
  • Consistent spacing and sizing
  • Smooth transitions and hover effects

src/style/app.module.css Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/style/app.module.css (2)

219-219: Use semantic variable names instead of color-based names.

The variable name --grey-bg-color-agenda-category describes the color rather than its function. Use semantic names to support theming and dark mode.

--- --grey-bg-color-agenda-category: #4b5563;
+++ --agenda-category-title-color: #4b5563;
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[warning] Code style issues found. Run Prettier with --write to fix formatting issues.


9147-9186: Fix code formatting issues.

Run Prettier with --write to fix the formatting issues flagged by the pipeline.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[warning] Code style issues found. Run Prettier with --write to fix formatting issues.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8456338 and 74746f0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/style/app.module.css (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow
src/style/app.module.css

[warning] Code style issues found. Run Prettier with --write to fix formatting issues.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)

9150-9186: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve class naming consistency and modal positioning.

  1. Use consistent kebab-case for class names
  2. Enhance modal positioning for better responsiveness
-.createModalAgendaCategory {
+.create-modal-agenda-category {
   position: fixed;
   top: 50%;
   left: 50%;
   transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
   max-width: 80vw;
+  width: 100%;
+  margin: 0 auto;
+  padding: 1rem;
+  box-sizing: border-box;

   @media (max-width: 768px) {
     max-width: 95vw;
   }
 }

-.titlemodalAgendaCategory {
+.title-modal-agenda-category {
   color: var(--agenda-category-title-color);
   font-weight: 600;
   font-size: 20px;
   margin-bottom: 20px;
   padding-bottom: 5px;
   border-bottom: 3px solid var(--bs-primary);
   width: 65%;
+  
+  @media (max-width: 768px) {
+    width: 100%;
+  }
 }

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[warning] Code style issues found. Run Prettier with --write to fix formatting issues.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)

9150-9161: Improve modal positioning and responsiveness.

The modal positioning can be improved for better maintainability and accessibility.

Apply this diff to enhance the implementation:

 .createModalAgendaCategory {
-  position: fixed;
-  top: 50%;
-  left: 50%;
-  transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
+  position: fixed;
+  top: 0;
+  left: 0;
+  right: 0;
+  bottom: 0;
+  display: flex;
+  align-items: center;
+  justify-content: center;
   max-width: 80vw;
+  margin: auto;
+  z-index: 1050;

   @media (max-width: 768px) {
     max-width: 95vw;
   }
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 74746f0 and b61598f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/style/app.module.css (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Test Application
  • GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)

9172-9186: LGTM! Well-structured button styles with proper accessibility.

The button implementation follows best practices:

  • Uses semantic units (rem) for dimensions
  • Includes hover and focus states
  • Has proper transitions
  • Implements focus-visible outline for accessibility

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Jan 28, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@palisadoes palisadoes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use variable names that describe the function of the color and not the color itself. This will help with adding a Dark Mode feature.

  • For example --search-button-bg is much better than --light-blue

src/style/app.module.css Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b61598f and c2c9bc4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/style/app.module.css (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Test Application
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/style/app.module.css (3)

9150-9161: LGTM! Well-implemented modal positioning.

The modal positioning is correctly implemented with fixed positioning and transform for centering. The responsive behavior for mobile screens is properly handled with media queries.


9172-9186: LGTM! Well-implemented button styles.

The options button styles are well implemented with:

  • Proper use of rem units for sizing
  • Good hover and focus states
  • Accessibility considerations with focus-visible

219-219: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use semantic variable names for colors.

The variable name should describe its function rather than the color itself, as mentioned in past review comments.

Apply this diff to improve the implementation:

--- --grey-bg-color-agenda-category: #4b5563;
+++ --agenda-category-title-color: #4b5563;

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

src/style/app.module.css Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@palisadoes palisadoes merged commit f63f181 into PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres Jan 29, 2025
19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants