-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 848
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Figma: Refactor CSS files in src/components/AgendaCategory #3472
Figma: Refactor CSS files in src/components/AgendaCategory #3472
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request involves refactoring CSS styles for the AgendaCategory component. The changes include removing the Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)
9129-9131
: Remove unnecessary empty lines.These empty lines should be removed to maintain clean code style.
- - -🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow
[warning] Code style issues found. Run Prettier with --write to fix formatting issues.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/components/AgendaCategory/AgendaCategoryContainer.module.css
(0 hunks)src/components/AgendaCategory/AgendaCategoryContainer.tsx
(1 hunks)src/style/app.module.css
(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/components/AgendaCategory/AgendaCategoryContainer.module.css
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/components/AgendaCategory/AgendaCategoryContainer.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow
src/style/app.module.css
[warning] Code style issues found. Run Prettier with --write to fix formatting issues.
@Anushkaguptaaaa Please fix the failed tests and make sure coderabbit approves the PR |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/style/app.module.css (2)
9132-9136
: Improve modal positioning for better responsiveness.The fixed margin values may cause layout issues on smaller screens.
.createModalAgendaCategory { - margin-top: 20vh; - margin-left: 13vw; + position: fixed; + top: 50%; + left: 50%; + transform: translate(-50%, -50%); max-width: 80vw; + width: 100%; + + @media (max-width: 768px) { + max-width: 95vw; + } }
9148-9151
: Add interactive states and use relative units.The button could benefit from hover/focus states and relative units for better accessibility.
-.agendaCategoryOptionsButton { +.agenda-category-options-button { - width: 24px; - height: 24px; + width: 1.5rem; + height: 1.5rem; + cursor: pointer; + transition: transform 0.2s ease; + + &:hover { + transform: scale(1.1); + } + + &:focus-visible { + outline: 2px solid var(--light-blue); + outline-offset: 2px; + } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/style/app.module.css
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Test Application
- GitHub Check: Check Python Code Style
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)
9138-9146
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionUse consistent naming convention and CSS variables.
The class uses camelCase which is inconsistent with CSS conventions. Also, hardcoded values should be replaced with CSS variables.
-.titlemodalAgendaCategory { +.title-modal-agenda-category { - color: var(--bs-gray-600); + color: var(--grey-bg-color-dark); font-weight: 600; font-size: 20px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding-bottom: 5px; - border-bottom: 3px solid var(--bs-primary); + border-bottom: 3px solid var(--light-blue); width: 65%; + + @media (max-width: 768px) { + width: 100%; + } }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #3472 +/- ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage 1.90% 88.82% +86.92%
=====================================================
Files 316 338 +22
Lines 8249 8626 +377
Branches 1880 1922 +42
=====================================================
+ Hits 157 7662 +7505
+ Misses 8083 634 -7449
- Partials 9 330 +321 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)
9132-9142
: Add responsive styles for better mobile support.The modal's positioning and width could be improved for better mobile experience.
.createModalAgendaCategory { position: fixed; top: 50%; left: 50%; transform: translate(-50%, -50%); max-width: 80vw; @media (max-width: 768px) { max-width: 95vw; + margin: 0 auto; + padding: 1rem; } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/style/app.module.css
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Test Application
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/style/app.module.css (2)
9154-9168
: LGTM! Well-structured button styles.The button styles follow best practices with:
- Consistent naming using kebab-case
- Proper use of rem units
- Good accessibility with focus states
- Smooth transitions
9144-9152
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionUse consistent naming convention and CSS variables.
The class name uses camelCase while others use kebab-case. Also, hardcoded color values should use CSS variables.
-.titlemodalAgendaCategory { +.title-modal-agenda-category { - color: var(--bs-gray-600); + color: var(--grey-bg-color-dark); font-weight: 600; font-size: 20px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding-bottom: 5px; - border-bottom: 3px solid var(--bs-primary); + border-bottom: 3px solid var(--light-blue); width: 65%; }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/style/app.module.css (2)
9132-9142
: Use consistent kebab-case naming convention for CSS classes.The class name should follow kebab-case naming convention for consistency with other CSS classes.
-.createModalAgendaCategory { +.create-modal-agenda-category { position: fixed; top: 50%; left: 50%; transform: translate(-50%, -50%); max-width: 80vw; @media (max-width: 768px) { max-width: 95vw; } }
9144-9152
: Improve title modal class implementation.The class needs improvements for better maintainability and responsiveness:
- Use kebab-case naming convention
- Make width more responsive
- Use CSS variables for consistent spacing
-.titlemodalAgendaCategory { +.title-modal-agenda-category { color: var(--bs-gray-600); font-weight: 600; font-size: 20px; - margin-bottom: 20px; - padding-bottom: 5px; + margin-bottom: var(--spacing-lg, 20px); + padding-bottom: var(--spacing-sm, 5px); border-bottom: 3px solid var(--bs-primary); - width: 65%; + width: clamp(65%, 80%, 95%); + + @media (max-width: 768px) { + width: 100%; + } }src/components/AgendaCategory/AgendaCategoryContainer.tsx (1)
Line range hint
213-224
: Consider adding visual regression tests.Since this PR involves CSS refactoring, it's recommended to add visual regression tests to ensure the UI appearance remains unchanged after moving styles to app.module.css.
You could use tools like:
- Percy
- Chromatic
- Cypress Visual Testing
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/components/AgendaCategory/AgendaCategoryContainer.module.css
(0 hunks)src/components/AgendaCategory/AgendaCategoryContainer.tsx
(1 hunks)src/style/app.module.css
(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/components/AgendaCategory/AgendaCategoryContainer.module.css
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/style/app.module.css (1)
9154-9168
: LGTM! Well-implemented button styles with accessibility considerations.The implementation includes:
- Proper use of rem units for dimensions
- Smooth hover transition effect
- Focus-visible outline for accessibility
- Good use of CSS variables
src/components/AgendaCategory/AgendaCategoryContainer.tsx (2)
13-13
: LGTM: Import path updated correctly for style consolidation.The change aligns with the PR objective of consolidating styles into app.module.css.
Line range hint
213-213
: Verify style class naming convention.There appears to be an inconsistency between the class name used in the code (
agendaCategoryOptionsButton
) and the one mentioned in the summary (agenda-category-options-button
). Please ensure the class name in app.module.css matches the one used in the component.Also applies to: 224-224
Hello @Cioppolo14, I have fixed the code rabbit review comment, and resolved it again. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/style/app.module.css
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)
9130-9169
: LGTM! Well-structured CSS for AgendaCategory component.The CSS implementation follows best practices:
- Proper use of CSS variables for colors
- Responsive design with media queries
- Accessible focus states
- Consistent spacing and sizing
- Smooth transitions and hover effects
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/style/app.module.css (2)
219-219
: Use semantic variable names instead of color-based names.The variable name
--grey-bg-color-agenda-category
describes the color rather than its function. Use semantic names to support theming and dark mode.--- --grey-bg-color-agenda-category: #4b5563; +++ --agenda-category-title-color: #4b5563;🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow
[warning] Code style issues found. Run Prettier with --write to fix formatting issues.
9147-9186
: Fix code formatting issues.Run Prettier with --write to fix the formatting issues flagged by the pipeline.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow
[warning] Code style issues found. Run Prettier with --write to fix formatting issues.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/style/app.module.css
(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow
src/style/app.module.css
[warning] Code style issues found. Run Prettier with --write to fix formatting issues.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)
9150-9186
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionImprove class naming consistency and modal positioning.
- Use consistent kebab-case for class names
- Enhance modal positioning for better responsiveness
-.createModalAgendaCategory { +.create-modal-agenda-category { position: fixed; top: 50%; left: 50%; transform: translate(-50%, -50%); max-width: 80vw; + width: 100%; + margin: 0 auto; + padding: 1rem; + box-sizing: border-box; @media (max-width: 768px) { max-width: 95vw; } } -.titlemodalAgendaCategory { +.title-modal-agenda-category { color: var(--agenda-category-title-color); font-weight: 600; font-size: 20px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding-bottom: 5px; border-bottom: 3px solid var(--bs-primary); width: 65%; + + @media (max-width: 768px) { + width: 100%; + } }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow
[warning] Code style issues found. Run Prettier with --write to fix formatting issues.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)
9150-9161
: Improve modal positioning and responsiveness.The modal positioning can be improved for better maintainability and accessibility.
Apply this diff to enhance the implementation:
.createModalAgendaCategory { - position: fixed; - top: 50%; - left: 50%; - transform: translate(-50%, -50%); + position: fixed; + top: 0; + left: 0; + right: 0; + bottom: 0; + display: flex; + align-items: center; + justify-content: center; max-width: 80vw; + margin: auto; + z-index: 1050; @media (max-width: 768px) { max-width: 95vw; } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/style/app.module.css
(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Test Application
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)
9172-9186
: LGTM! Well-structured button styles with proper accessibility.The button implementation follows best practices:
- Uses semantic units (rem) for dimensions
- Includes hover and focus states
- Has proper transitions
- Implements focus-visible outline for accessibility
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Use variable names that describe the function of the color and not the color itself. This will help with adding a Dark Mode feature.
- For example
--search-button-bg
is much better than--light-blue
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/style/app.module.css
(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Test Application
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/style/app.module.css (3)
9150-9161
: LGTM! Well-implemented modal positioning.The modal positioning is correctly implemented with fixed positioning and transform for centering. The responsive behavior for mobile screens is properly handled with media queries.
9172-9186
: LGTM! Well-implemented button styles.The options button styles are well implemented with:
- Proper use of rem units for sizing
- Good hover and focus states
- Accessibility considerations with focus-visible
219-219
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionUse semantic variable names for colors.
The variable name should describe its function rather than the color itself, as mentioned in past review comments.
Apply this diff to improve the implementation:
--- --grey-bg-color-agenda-category: #4b5563; +++ --agenda-category-title-color: #4b5563;Likely invalid or redundant comment.
f63f181
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Refactoring
Issue Number:
#3316
Snapshots/Videos:
Summary
Aim is to consolidate style sheet in agenda category into app.module style sheet
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Checklist
CodeRabbit AI Review
Test Coverage
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit