Achieved code coverage upto 100% #3465
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request focuses on enhancing the test suite for the Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/components/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.spec.tsx (2)
398-432: Add toast mock cleanup.To prevent potential interference between tests, consider clearing the toast mock in the
beforeEachblock:beforeEach(() => { vi.clearAllMocks(); mockGetItem.mockReturnValue('mockUserId'); + vi.mocked(toast.error).mockClear(); + vi.mocked(toast.success).mockClear(); });
433-483: Improve test maintainability.Consider these improvements:
- Extract mutation spy setup to a helper function for reuse
- Add more descriptive comments explaining the test scenario
+// Helper function to create mutation spy +const createCancelRequestSpy = () => vi.fn(() => ({ + data: { + cancelMembershipRequest: { success: true }, + }, +})); it('should handle membership request not found', async () => { - // Mock getItem to return a userId that exists + // Setup: Mock user ID and create spy for cancel request mutation mockGetItem.mockReturnValue('testUserId'); - - // Create mutation spy - const cancelRequestSpy = vi.fn(() => ({ - data: { - cancelMembershipRequest: { success: true }, - }, - })); + const cancelRequestSpy = createCancelRequestSpy();
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.spec.tsx(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Test Application
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.spec.tsx (2)
Line range hint
350-528: Well-structured test suite with comprehensive error handling coverage!The new tests effectively cover various error scenarios and edge cases, contributing to the PR's objective of achieving 100% code coverage. The use of spies, mocks, and proper cleanup shows good testing practices.
Line range hint
350-396: Verify translation key for error message.The test verifies the error toast but doesn't ensure the translation key 'errorOccured' exists in the i18n configuration. Consider adding an assertion to verify the translation exists:
await waitFor(() => { expect(consoleErrorSpy).toHaveBeenCalledWith( 'Failed to withdraw membership request:', expect.any(Error), ); expect(toast.error).toHaveBeenCalledWith('errorOccured'); + expect(i18n.exists('users.errorOccured')).toBe(true); });✅ Verification successful
Translation key exists but could be improved
The 'errorOccured' translation key exists in all language files (
public/locales/*/translation.json), but there are two potential improvements:
- Consider moving the error message to
errors.jsonwhere other error messages are maintained- The English translation appears to be a placeholder ("errorOccured" → "errorOccured")
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash # First, find all potential translation files echo "=== Finding translation files ===" fd -e json -e yaml -e yml -e ts -e js -p "locale|i18n|translations?" echo -e "\n=== Searching for 'errorOccured' key ===" rg -i "errorOccured" --type json --type yaml --type typescript --type javascriptLength of output: 884
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for errorOccured in all json files echo "=== Searching for 'errorOccured' in translation files ===" rg -i "errorOccured" public/locales/ # Also check the content of errors.json files specifically echo -e "\n=== Content of errors.json files ===" for f in public/locales/*/errors.json; do echo "=== $f ===" cat "$f" doneLength of output: 5595
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #3465 +/- ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage 1.90% 88.67% +86.77%
=====================================================
Files 316 338 +22
Lines 8249 8620 +371
Branches 1880 1918 +38
=====================================================
+ Hits 157 7644 +7487
+ Misses 8083 647 -7436
- Partials 9 329 +320 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/components/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.spec.tsx (3)
Line range hint
350-396: Consider using test lifecycle hooks for environment setup/cleanup.The environment setup and cleanup could be more robust using
beforeEach/afterEachhooks to ensure cleanup even if the test fails.+ const originalNodeEnv = process.env.NODE_ENV; + let consoleErrorSpy: any; + + beforeEach(() => { + process.env.NODE_ENV = 'development'; + consoleErrorSpy = vi.spyOn(console, 'error').mockImplementation(() => {}); + }); + + afterEach(() => { + process.env.NODE_ENV = originalNodeEnv; + consoleErrorSpy.mockRestore(); + }); it('should log development error and show generic error toast', async () => { - const consoleErrorSpy = vi - .spyOn(console, 'error') - .mockImplementation(() => {}); - - // Mock process.env.NODE_ENV to 'development' - const originalNodeEnv = process.env.NODE_ENV; - process.env.NODE_ENV = 'development'; // ... rest of the test ... - // Restore original environment - process.env.NODE_ENV = originalNodeEnv; - consoleErrorSpy.mockRestore(); });
398-432: Improve test clarity and reduce mock duplication.The test could be more explicit about testing the GraphQL error type, and the error mocks could be reused.
+ // Add to error mocks at the top of the file + const errorMocksWithGraphQLErrors: MockedResponse[] = [ + { + request: { + query: JOIN_PUBLIC_ORGANIZATION, + variables: { organizationId: '123' }, + }, + result: { + errors: [ + { + message: 'Already a member', + extensions: { code: 'ALREADY_MEMBER' }, + }, + ], + }, + }, + ]; - it('should handle already joined error when joining organization', async () => { + it('should handle GraphQL ALREADY_MEMBER error when joining organization', async () => { - const errorMocksWithAlreadyJoined: MockedResponse[] = [ - { - request: { - query: JOIN_PUBLIC_ORGANIZATION, - variables: { organizationId: '123' }, - }, - result: { - errors: [ - { - message: 'Already a member', - extensions: { code: 'ALREADY_MEMBER' }, - }, - ], - }, - }, - ]; render( - <TestWrapper mocks={errorMocksWithAlreadyJoined}> + <TestWrapper mocks={errorMocksWithGraphQLErrors}>
433-483: Extract common test setup to reduce duplication.The mutation spy setup is duplicated in multiple tests. Consider extracting it to a helper function.
+ // Add at the top of the describe block + const createCancelRequestSpy = () => vi.fn(() => ({ + data: { + cancelMembershipRequest: { success: true }, + }, + })); + + const createMocksWithSpy = (spy: any) => [ + ...successMocks, + { + request: { + query: CANCEL_MEMBERSHIP_REQUEST, + variables: { membershipRequestId: 'requestId' }, + }, + result: spy, + }, + ]; it('should handle membership request not found', async () => { mockGetItem.mockReturnValue('testUserId'); - const cancelRequestSpy = vi.fn(() => ({ - data: { - cancelMembershipRequest: { success: true }, - }, - })); + const cancelRequestSpy = createCancelRequestSpy(); - const mocksWithSpy = [ - ...successMocks, - { - request: { - query: CANCEL_MEMBERSHIP_REQUEST, - variables: { membershipRequestId: 'requestId' }, - }, - result: cancelRequestSpy, - }, - ]; + const mocksWithSpy = createMocksWithSpy(cancelRequestSpy);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.spec.tsx(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.spec.tsx (2)
485-528: Previous review comments are still applicable.The issues noted in the previous review still need to be addressed:
- The translation key 'UserIdNotFound' is not defined in the i18n setup
- The mutation spy setup is duplicated
Line range hint
350-528: Overall test coverage improvements look good! 👍The new tests thoroughly cover various error scenarios and edge cases, contributing to the goal of achieving 100% code coverage. The tests are well-structured and verify both the error handling and user feedback through toasts.
gautam-divyanshu
merged commit aa57499
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Achieved 100% Code Coverage for OrganizationCard Component
Issue Number: #3459
Snapshots/Videos:
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No, this PR does not introduce a breaking chan
Checklist
CodeRabbit AI Review
Test Coverage
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
OrganizationCardcomponent.