Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Achieved 100% Code Coverage for OrganizationCard Component #3464

Conversation

gkbishnoi07
Copy link

@gkbishnoi07 gkbishnoi07 commented Jan 27, 2025

What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Achieved 100% Code Coverage for OrganizationCard Component

Issue Number: 3459

Snapshots/Videos:

Screenshot 2025-01-27 181520

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No, this PR does not introduce a breaking chan

Checklist

CodeRabbit AI Review

  • I have reviewed and addressed all critical issues flagged by CodeRabbit AI
  • I have implemented or provided justification for each non-critical suggestion
  • I have documented my reasoning in the PR comments where CodeRabbit AI suggestions were not implemented

Test Coverage

  • I have written tests for all new changes/features
  • I have verified that test coverage meets or exceeds 95%
  • I have run the test suite locally and all tests pass

Other information

Have you read the contributing guide?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Enhanced test coverage for the OrganizationCard component.
    • Added tests for handling membership withdrawal errors and displaying appropriate messages.
    • Improved handling of edge cases such as duplicate membership and missing user ID.
    • Strengthened error message validation for organization-related actions.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 27, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request focuses on enhancing the test suite for the OrganizationCard component by adding comprehensive test cases for various error scenarios. The modifications include tests for handling membership withdrawal errors, scenarios where a user is already a member of an organization, cases with unmatched membership requests, and situations where no user ID is available during membership withdrawal.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/components/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.spec.tsx Added multiple test cases for error handling:
- Membership withdrawal error logging and toast display
- Handling attempts to join an organization when already a member
- Handling membership requests with unmatched user IDs
- Testing scenarios with no user ID during membership withdrawal

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • palisadoes

Poem

🐰 In the realm of code, where tests dance and play,
A rabbit hops through errors, keeping bugs at bay.
OrganizationCard's tests, now sharp and bright,
Catching edge cases with algorithmic might.
Test coverage leaps, with coverage so clean! 🧪✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/components/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.spec.tsx (3)

351-395: Improve test name to be more descriptive.

The current test name "should log development error and show generic error toast" could be more specific about the scenario being tested.

-  it('should log development error and show generic error toast', async () => {
+  it('should log error in development and show toast when membership withdrawal fails', async () => {

Also, fix the formatting issues to resolve the Prettier warnings:

    expect(consoleErrorSpy).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
-     'Failed to withdraw membership request:', 
+     'Failed to withdraw membership request:',
      expect.any(Error)
    );
🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint

[error] 352-352: Replace .spyOn(console,·'error') with ⏎······.spyOn(console,·'error')⏎······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 353-353: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 357-357: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 364-364: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 374-374: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 378-378: Insert ,

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 380-380: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 383-383: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 386-386: Delete ·

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 387-387: Insert ,

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 391-391: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)

🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[warning] Code style issues found. File needs to be formatted using Prettier.


397-431: Consider moving error mock to common error mocks section.

The errorMocksWithAlreadyJoined could be moved to the common error mocks section at the top of the file for better organization and reusability.

Also, fix the formatting issues to resolve the Prettier warnings:

      <TestWrapper mocks={errorMocksWithAlreadyJoined}>
-       <OrganizationCard 
-         {...defaultProps} 
-         userRegistrationRequired={false} 
-         isJoined={false} 
-       />
+       <OrganizationCard
+         {...defaultProps}
+         userRegistrationRequired={false}
+         isJoined={false}
+       />
      </TestWrapper>
🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint

[error] 414-414: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 417-417: Delete ·

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 418-418: Delete ·

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 419-419: Delete ·

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 420-420: Delete ·

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 422-422: Insert ,

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 424-424: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 427-427: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)

🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[warning] Code style issues found. File needs to be formatted using Prettier.


Line range hint 269-502: Overall good test coverage with some improvements needed.

The new tests effectively cover various error scenarios, which helps achieve the PR's objective of 100% code coverage. However, there are some consistent issues that should be addressed:

  1. Run Prettier to fix formatting issues throughout the file
  2. Fix incorrect assertion syntax (not.toHaveBeenCallednot.toHaveBeenCalled())
  3. Verify that all error messages are defined in translations
  4. Consider organizing error mocks in the common section

Despite these issues, the tests are well-structured and provide good coverage of error scenarios.

🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint

[error] 352-352: Replace .spyOn(console,·'error') with ⏎······.spyOn(console,·'error')⏎······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 353-353: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 357-357: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 364-364: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 374-374: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 378-378: Insert ,

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 380-380: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 383-383: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 386-386: Delete ·

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 387-387: Insert ,

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 391-391: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 396-396: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 414-414: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 417-417: Delete ·

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 418-418: Delete ·

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 419-419: Delete ·

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 420-420: Delete ·

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 422-422: Insert ,

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 424-424: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 427-427: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 432-432: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 433-433: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 434-434: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 435-435: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 436-436: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 437-437: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 438-438: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 439-439: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 440-440: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 441-441: Replace ··{· with {

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 442-442: Replace ············_id:·'requestId',· with ··········_id:·'requestId',

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 443-443: Replace ··user:·{· with user:·{

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 444-444: Replace ··············_id:·'differentUserId'· with ············_id:·'differentUserId',

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 445-445: Replace ··}· with },

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 446-446: Replace ··········} with ········},

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 447-447: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 448-448: Replace ······ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 449-449: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 450-450: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 451-451: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 452-452: Replace ·········· with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 453-453: Replace ··</TestWrapper> with </TestWrapper>,

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 454-454: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 455-455: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 456-456: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 457-457: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 458-458: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 459-459: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 460-460: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 461-461: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 462-462: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 463-463: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 464-464: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 465-465: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 466-466: Replace ······ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 467-467: Replace ········mock·=>·mock.request.query·===·CANCEL_MEMBERSHIP_REQUEST with ······(mock)·=>·mock.request.query·===·CANCEL_MEMBERSHIP_REQUEST,

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 468-468: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 469-469: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 469-469: Expected an assignment or function call and instead saw an expression.

(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-expressions)


[error] 469-469: Matchers must be called to assert

(jest/valid-expect)


[error] 470-472: Replace ··});⏎⏎·· with });

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 477-477: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 483-483: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 487-487: Insert ,

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 489-489: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 492-492: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 496-496: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 498-502: Expected an assignment or function call and instead saw an expression.

(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-expressions)


[error] 500-500: Replace mock·=>·mock.request.query·===·CANCEL_MEMBERSHIP_REQUEST with (mock)·=>·mock.request.query·===·CANCEL_MEMBERSHIP_REQUEST,

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 501-501: Insert ,

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 502-502: Matchers must be called to assert

(jest/valid-expect)

🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[warning] Code style issues found. File needs to be formatted using Prettier.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 73cf8cd and ee0c1aa.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/components/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.spec.tsx (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 ESLint
src/components/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.spec.tsx

[error] 269-270: Delete ⏎··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 352-352: Replace .spyOn(console,·'error') with ⏎······.spyOn(console,·'error')⏎······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 353-353: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 357-357: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 364-364: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 374-374: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 378-378: Insert ,

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 380-380: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 383-383: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 386-386: Delete ·

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 387-387: Insert ,

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 391-391: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 396-396: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 414-414: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 417-417: Delete ·

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 418-418: Delete ·

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 419-419: Delete ·

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 420-420: Delete ·

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 422-422: Insert ,

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 424-424: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 427-427: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 432-432: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 433-433: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 434-434: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 435-435: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 436-436: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 437-437: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 438-438: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 439-439: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 440-440: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 441-441: Replace ··{· with {

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 442-442: Replace ············_id:·'requestId',· with ··········_id:·'requestId',

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 443-443: Replace ··user:·{· with user:·{

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 444-444: Replace ··············_id:·'differentUserId'· with ············_id:·'differentUserId',

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 445-445: Replace ··}· with },

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 446-446: Replace ··········} with ········},

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 447-447: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 448-448: Replace ······ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 449-449: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 450-450: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 451-451: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 452-452: Replace ·········· with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 453-453: Replace ··</TestWrapper> with </TestWrapper>,

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 454-454: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 455-455: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 456-456: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 457-457: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 458-458: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 459-459: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 460-460: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 461-461: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 462-462: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 463-463: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 464-464: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 465-465: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 466-466: Replace ······ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 467-467: Replace ········mock·=>·mock.request.query·===·CANCEL_MEMBERSHIP_REQUEST with ······(mock)·=>·mock.request.query·===·CANCEL_MEMBERSHIP_REQUEST,

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 468-468: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 469-469: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 469-469: Expected an assignment or function call and instead saw an expression.

(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-expressions)


[error] 469-469: Matchers must be called to assert

(jest/valid-expect)


[error] 470-472: Replace ··});⏎⏎·· with });

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 477-477: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 483-483: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 487-487: Insert ,

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 489-489: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 492-492: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 496-496: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 498-502: Expected an assignment or function call and instead saw an expression.

(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-expressions)


[error] 500-500: Replace mock·=>·mock.request.query·===·CANCEL_MEMBERSHIP_REQUEST with (mock)·=>·mock.request.query·===·CANCEL_MEMBERSHIP_REQUEST,

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 501-501: Insert ,

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 502-502: Matchers must be called to assert

(jest/valid-expect)

🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow
src/components/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.spec.tsx

[warning] Code style issues found. File needs to be formatted using Prettier.

Comment on lines 432 to 470
it('should handle membership request not found', async () => {
// Mock getItem to return a userId that exists
mockGetItem.mockReturnValue('testUserId');

const props = {
...defaultProps,
membershipRequestStatus: 'pending',
// Create a membership requests array with a different user ID
membershipRequests: [
{
_id: 'requestId',
user: {
_id: 'differentUserId' // Different from the mocked userId
}
}
],
};

render(
<TestWrapper mocks={successMocks}>
<OrganizationCard {...props} isJoined={false} />
</TestWrapper>
);

// Find and click the withdraw button
const withdrawButton = screen.getByTestId('withdrawBtn');
await fireEvent.click(withdrawButton);

// Verify that the error toast is shown
await waitFor(() => {
expect(toast.error).toHaveBeenCalledWith('MembershipRequestNotFound');
});

// Verify the mutation was not called
const cancelMutation = successMocks.find(
mock => mock.request.query === CANCEL_MEMBERSHIP_REQUEST
);
expect(cancelMutation?.result).not.toHaveBeenCalled;
});
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix incorrect assertion syntax and formatting issues.

The test has an incorrect assertion syntax and multiple formatting issues that need to be addressed.

      const cancelMutation = successMocks.find(
-       mock => mock.request.query === CANCEL_MEMBERSHIP_REQUEST
+       (mock) => mock.request.query === CANCEL_MEMBERSHIP_REQUEST,
      );
-     expect(cancelMutation?.result).not.toHaveBeenCalled;
+     expect(cancelMutation?.result).not.toHaveBeenCalled();

Also, fix the formatting issues in the membership requests array:

        membershipRequests: [
-         { 
-           _id: 'requestId', 
-           user: { 
-             _id: 'differentUserId'  // Different from the mocked userId
-           } 
-         }
+         {
+           _id: 'requestId',
+           user: {
+             _id: 'differentUserId',
+           },
+         },
        ],
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
it('should handle membership request not found', async () => {
// Mock getItem to return a userId that exists
mockGetItem.mockReturnValue('testUserId');
const props = {
...defaultProps,
membershipRequestStatus: 'pending',
// Create a membership requests array with a different user ID
membershipRequests: [
{
_id: 'requestId',
user: {
_id: 'differentUserId' // Different from the mocked userId
}
}
],
};
render(
<TestWrapper mocks={successMocks}>
<OrganizationCard {...props} isJoined={false} />
</TestWrapper>
);
// Find and click the withdraw button
const withdrawButton = screen.getByTestId('withdrawBtn');
await fireEvent.click(withdrawButton);
// Verify that the error toast is shown
await waitFor(() => {
expect(toast.error).toHaveBeenCalledWith('MembershipRequestNotFound');
});
// Verify the mutation was not called
const cancelMutation = successMocks.find(
mock => mock.request.query === CANCEL_MEMBERSHIP_REQUEST
);
expect(cancelMutation?.result).not.toHaveBeenCalled;
});
it('should handle membership request not found', async () => {
// Mock getItem to return a userId that exists
mockGetItem.mockReturnValue('testUserId');
const props = {
...defaultProps,
membershipRequestStatus: 'pending',
// Create a membership requests array with a different user ID
membershipRequests: [
{
_id: 'requestId',
user: {
_id: 'differentUserId',
},
},
],
};
render(
<TestWrapper mocks={successMocks}>
<OrganizationCard {...props} isJoined={false} />
</TestWrapper>
);
// Find and click the withdraw button
const withdrawButton = screen.getByTestId('withdrawBtn');
await fireEvent.click(withdrawButton);
// Verify that the error toast is shown
await waitFor(() => {
expect(toast.error).toHaveBeenCalledWith('MembershipRequestNotFound');
});
// Verify the mutation was not called
const cancelMutation = successMocks.find(
(mock) => mock.request.query === CANCEL_MEMBERSHIP_REQUEST,
);
expect(cancelMutation?.result).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint

[error] 432-432: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 433-433: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 434-434: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 435-435: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 436-436: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 437-437: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 438-438: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 439-439: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 440-440: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 441-441: Replace ··{· with {

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 442-442: Replace ············_id:·'requestId',· with ··········_id:·'requestId',

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 443-443: Replace ··user:·{· with user:·{

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 444-444: Replace ··············_id:·'differentUserId'· with ············_id:·'differentUserId',

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 445-445: Replace ··}· with },

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 446-446: Replace ··········} with ········},

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 447-447: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 448-448: Replace ······ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 449-449: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 450-450: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 451-451: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 452-452: Replace ·········· with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 453-453: Replace ··</TestWrapper> with </TestWrapper>,

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 454-454: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 455-455: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 456-456: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 457-457: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 458-458: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 459-459: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 460-460: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 461-461: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 462-462: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 463-463: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 464-464: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 465-465: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 466-466: Replace ······ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 467-467: Replace ········mock·=>·mock.request.query·===·CANCEL_MEMBERSHIP_REQUEST with ······(mock)·=>·mock.request.query·===·CANCEL_MEMBERSHIP_REQUEST,

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 468-468: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 469-469: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 469-469: Expected an assignment or function call and instead saw an expression.

(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-expressions)


[error] 469-469: Matchers must be called to assert

(jest/valid-expect)

🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[warning] Code style issues found. File needs to be formatted using Prettier.

Comment on lines 474 to 502
it('should handle withdrawal attempt with no userId', async () => {
// Mock getItem to return null to simulate no userId
mockGetItem.mockReturnValue(null);

const props = {
...defaultProps,
membershipRequestStatus: 'pending',
membershipRequests: [{ _id: 'requestId', user: { _id: 'mockUserId' } }],
};

render(
<TestWrapper mocks={successMocks}>
<OrganizationCard {...props} isJoined={false} />
</TestWrapper>
);

const withdrawButton = screen.getByTestId('withdrawBtn');
await fireEvent.click(withdrawButton);

await waitFor(() => {
expect(toast.error).toHaveBeenCalledWith('MembershipRequestNotFound');
expect(toast.error).toHaveBeenCalledWith('UserIdNotFound');
});

// Verify that the cancelMembershipRequest mutation was not called
expect(
successMocks.find(
mock => mock.request.query === CANCEL_MEMBERSHIP_REQUEST
)?.result
).not.toHaveBeenCalled;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix assertion syntax and use proper translation key for error message

The test has two issues that need to be addressed:

  1. Incorrect assertion syntax (missing parentheses)
  2. Using non-existent translation key 'UserIdNotFound'
      expect(
        successMocks.find(
          (mock) => mock.request.query === CANCEL_MEMBERSHIP_REQUEST
        )?.result
-     ).not.toHaveBeenCalled;
+     ).not.toHaveBeenCalled();

     await waitFor(() => {
-      expect(toast.error).toHaveBeenCalledWith('UserIdNotFound');
+      expect(toast.error).toHaveBeenCalledWith('notFound');
     });

Consider using an existing translation key like 'notFound' or add a new specific translation key for this error case in the translation files.

🔗 Analysis chain

Fix assertion syntax and verify error message translation.

The test has multiple issues that need to be addressed:

  1. Incorrect assertion syntax
  2. The error message 'UserIdNotFound' might not be defined in the translations
      expect(
        successMocks.find(
-         mock => mock.request.query === CANCEL_MEMBERSHIP_REQUEST
+         (mock) => mock.request.query === CANCEL_MEMBERSHIP_REQUEST,
        )?.result
-     ).not.toHaveBeenCalled;
+     ).not.toHaveBeenCalled();

Let's verify if the error message is defined in the translations:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for 'UserIdNotFound' in translation files
rg -l "UserIdNotFound" --type json

Length of output: 34


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# First, let's find all potential translation/locale files
echo "=== Searching for translation files ==="
fd -e json -e yaml -e yml . | grep -iE 'translation|locale|i18n|lang'

echo -e "\n=== Searching for similar message patterns ==="
# Search for various forms of the message
rg -i "userid.*not.*found|user.*id.*not.*found|user_id_not_found" --type json --type ts --type tsx

echo -e "\n=== Looking for message constants ==="
# Search for message definitions in TypeScript/JavaScript files
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = $$$"UserIdNotFound"$$$'

Length of output: 1021


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check content of error translation files
echo "=== Content of English error translations ==="
cat public/locales/en/errors.json

echo -e "\n=== Searching for any user-related error messages ==="
rg -i "user" public/locales/en/errors.json

Length of output: 1245

🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint

[error] 477-477: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 483-483: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 487-487: Insert ,

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 489-489: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 492-492: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 496-496: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 498-502: Expected an assignment or function call and instead saw an expression.

(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-expressions)


[error] 500-500: Replace mock·=>·mock.request.query·===·CANCEL_MEMBERSHIP_REQUEST with (mock)·=>·mock.request.query·===·CANCEL_MEMBERSHIP_REQUEST,

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 501-501: Insert ,

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 502-502: Matchers must be called to assert

(jest/valid-expect)

🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[warning] Code style issues found. File needs to be formatted using Prettier.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/components/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.spec.tsx (3)

366-374: Consider using errorPolicy in error mock for better Apollo Client integration.

The current error mock might not accurately represent how Apollo Client handles errors. Consider using the result field with errors array instead:

 const errorMocks: MockedResponse[] = [
   {
     request: {
       query: CANCEL_MEMBERSHIP_REQUEST,
       variables: { membershipRequestId: 'requestId' },
     },
-    error: new Error('Withdrawal failed'),
+    result: {
+      errors: [
+        {
+          message: 'Withdrawal failed',
+          extensions: { code: 'WITHDRAWAL_FAILED' },
+        },
+      ],
+    },
   },
 ];

399-414: Simplify error mock setup using a helper function.

Consider extracting the error mock setup to a helper function for better reusability and readability:

+const createGraphQLErrorMock = (query: any, variables: any, message: string, code: string) => ({
+  request: { query, variables },
+  result: {
+    errors: [
+      {
+        message,
+        extensions: { code },
+      },
+    ],
+  },
+});

-const errorMocksWithAlreadyJoined: MockedResponse[] = [
-  {
-    request: {
-      query: JOIN_PUBLIC_ORGANIZATION,
-      variables: { organizationId: '123' },
-    },
-    result: {
-      errors: [
-        {
-          message: 'Already a member',
-          extensions: { code: 'ALREADY_MEMBER' },
-        },
-      ],
-    },
-  },
-];
+const errorMocksWithAlreadyJoined: MockedResponse[] = [
+  createGraphQLErrorMock(
+    JOIN_PUBLIC_ORGANIZATION,
+    { organizationId: '123' },
+    'Already a member',
+    'ALREADY_MEMBER'
+  ),
+];

Line range hint 350-502: Consider restructuring error handling tests for better organization.

The error handling tests could be better organized under a dedicated describe block:

+  describe('Error Handling', () => {
+    describe('Membership Withdrawal', () => {
       it('should log development error and show generic error toast', async () => {
         // ... existing test
       });
       
       it('should handle withdrawal attempt with no userId', async () => {
         // ... existing test
       });
     });
     
+    describe('Organization Joining', () => {
       it('should handle already joined error when joining organization', async () => {
         // ... existing test
       });
       
       it('should handle membership request not found', async () => {
         // ... existing test
       });
     });
   });

This structure:

  1. Groups related error scenarios together
  2. Makes it easier to find and maintain error-related tests
  3. Provides better context for each test case
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ee0c1aa and ea35945.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/components/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.spec.tsx (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.spec.tsx (2)

433-471: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix formatting issues and assertion syntax.

The test has several issues that need to be addressed:

  1. Fix the formatting issues:
       membershipRequestStatus: 'pending',
-      // Create a membership requests array with a different user ID
       membershipRequests: [
         {
           _id: 'requestId',
           user: {
-            _id: 'differentUserId', // Different from the mocked userId
+            _id: 'differentUserId',
           },
         },
       ],
  1. Fix the assertion syntax:
     const cancelMutation = successMocks.find(
       (mock) => mock.request.query === CANCEL_MEMBERSHIP_REQUEST,
     );
-    expect(cancelMutation?.result).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    expect(cancelMutation?.result).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
  1. Remove unnecessary comments that don't add value to the test's readability.

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


473-502: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix error message key and assertion syntax.

The test has several issues that need to be addressed:

  1. Use an existing translation key for the error message:
     await waitFor(() => {
-      expect(toast.error).toHaveBeenCalledWith('UserIdNotFound');
+      expect(toast.error).toHaveBeenCalledWith('notFound');
     });
  1. Fix the assertion syntax:
     expect(
       successMocks.find(
         (mock) => mock.request.query === CANCEL_MEMBERSHIP_REQUEST,
-      )?.result,
-    ).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      )?.result
+    ).not.toHaveBeenCalled();

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

@gkbishnoi07 gkbishnoi07 closed this by deleting the head repository Jan 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant