Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Pin intake-esm under Python3.9 #338

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 7, 2024
Merged

Pin intake-esm under Python3.9 #338

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 7, 2024

Conversation

Zeitsperre
Copy link
Contributor

Pull Request Checklist:

  • This PR addresses an already opened issue (for bug fixes / features)
    • This PR fixes #xyz
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been added / updated (for bug fixes / features).
  • (If applicable) Tests have been added.
  • This PR does not seem to break the templates.
  • CHANGES.rst has been updated (with summary of main changes).
    • Link to issue (:issue:number) and pull request (:pull:number) has been added.

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Pins intake-esm to allow extended support for Python3.9

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No.

Other information:

@Zeitsperre Zeitsperre added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Feb 7, 2024
@Zeitsperre Zeitsperre self-assigned this Feb 7, 2024
@Zeitsperre Zeitsperre merged commit dcb6d82 into main Feb 7, 2024
20 checks passed
@Zeitsperre Zeitsperre deleted the pin-intake-esm branch February 7, 2024 16:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@juliettelavoie juliettelavoie juliettelavoie approved these changes

@aulemahal aulemahal Awaiting requested review from aulemahal

@RondeauG RondeauG Awaiting requested review from RondeauG

Assignees

@Zeitsperre Zeitsperre

Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@Zeitsperre @juliettelavoie