Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

85 review docstrings #86

Merged
merged 21 commits into from
Dec 4, 2024
Merged

85 review docstrings #86

merged 21 commits into from
Dec 4, 2024

Conversation

atravitz
Copy link
Contributor

Some typo and grammar fixes, as well as some questions.

@atravitz atravitz linked an issue Oct 25, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.81%. Comparing base (8c62d86) to head (b66f0e1).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #86   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.81%   86.81%           
=======================================
  Files          49       49           
  Lines        1577     1577           
=======================================
  Hits         1369     1369           
  Misses        208      208           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@atravitz atravitz marked this pull request as ready for review October 28, 2024 17:57
@atravitz atravitz requested a review from RiesBen October 28, 2024 18:00
@atravitz atravitz changed the title Draft: 85 review docstrings 85 review docstrings Nov 8, 2024
Copy link
Contributor Author

@atravitz atravitz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@hannahbaumann could you take a look at these last two open conversations?

Copy link
Contributor

@hannahbaumann hannahbaumann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here my comments on the two open questions, will go through the rest later. Maybe we can also meet and discuss @atravitz , I'm also not fully sure yet.

@atravitz atravitz force-pushed the 85-review-docstrings branch from 93d133a to ae0973b Compare November 15, 2024 17:12
@hannahbaumann hannahbaumann self-assigned this Nov 20, 2024
Copy link
Member

@IAlibay IAlibay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm going to approve as "this is an improvement", but there are follow-up work items that need to be dealt with. For example there's a ton of old references to Transformation that are likely innapropriate.

@atravitz
Copy link
Contributor Author

atravitz commented Dec 3, 2024

@hannahbaumann this is ready for re-review. I moved out-of-scope items into follow-up issues. CI is failing on one test, but it's also failing on main and I have an issue open to address it.

Copy link
Contributor

@hannahbaumann hannahbaumann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @atravitz , lgtm once CI and docs build are passing!

@atravitz atravitz merged commit b9ea6e4 into main Dec 4, 2024
1 of 5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Review docstrings
4 participants